Negligence / Property / Respondent lived as a boarder in the Applicant’s house / Respondent was required to move out after damage by carpet moths was found in his room / Applicant sought recovery of costs associated with the infestation / Held: evidence indicated that the carpet moth damage was the result of the Respondent’s lack of care / Respondent failed to keep his room in a condition that prevented or limited the moths’ growth / Reasonable boarder would have noticed the carpet damage and the moths and would have brought that to the Applicant’s attention / Evidence indicated that the carpet was beyond repair / Costs cannot be awarded for printing photos for the Applicant’s claim / Respondent ordered to pay $1,597.50 for carpet damage and associated costs / Claim allowed in part.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.
Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.
4 items matching your search terms
-
TN v KM [2024] NZDT 696 (29 November 2024) [PDF, 187 KB] -
TS v XX [2024] NZDT 625 (4 September 2024) [PDF, 176 KB] Contract / Respondent entered contract agreement to board Applicant's house / Applicant claimed Respondent left before her notice period ended / Applicant claimed Respondent is liable to pay rent / Held: Respondent not bound to fixed-term contract as a boarder / Respondent bound to give Applicant no more than 3 weeks notice / In effect, no notice was given as Respondent left on the same day notice was given / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $600 / Claim allowed in part.
-
TN v KM [2024] NZDT 106 (28 February 2024) [PDF, 103 KB] Contract / Respondent occupied room in Applicant’s house as a boarder / Agreed Respondent would clean his own bedroom and bathroom / Around time Respondent was moving out, Applicant entered room and found carpet substantially destroyed by carpet moths / Applicant said carpet and walls were covered in moths, cocoons and eggs / Applicant obtained quote for replacing carpet of $1,255.00, spent $67.96 on chemicals to treat room, and engaged cleaners for $230.00 to fumigate house / Applicant claimed Respondent responsible for damage as he had neither kept room clean nor taken action when infestation appeared / Held: damage caused by Respondent’s failure to clean carpet as he was obliged to do under parties’ agreement / Applicant had no choice but to replace carpet / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,552.96 / Claim allowed.
-
ABW and ABX v ZYG [2013] NZDT 123 (17 September 2013) [PDF, 37 KB] Evidence / burden of proof / Applicants resided at Respondent’s home as boarders / when agreement came to an end, Applicants moved out and claimed return of their bond / Held: parties had no evidence to support their claims other than recollections / there were no written documents, rent records, receipts and payments were made in cash / Applicants had not met burden of proving that the bond was paid / claim dismissed.