You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results for Filing.

121 items matching your search terms

  1. C Ltd v V Ltd & LV [2023] NZDT 658 (21 November 2023) [PDF, 262 KB]

    Contract / Parties entered into lease for commercial premises / Respondents did not wish to renew lease with increased rent / Respondents paid at old rate while looking for other premises / Applicant seeks shortfall between old rent and new rent, management fee, operational expenses, legal costs, management time and loss of rental income / Held: no rent arrears because of timing of rent increase / Management fee cannot be charged to the tenant / Operating expenses accepted by respondents / Each party must pay their own costs / No power to award costs for filing fee and photocopying / Respondents liable for outstanding operational expenses and damages for loss of opportunity to rent / Claim allowed, respondents to pay applicants $6,342.86

  2. T Ltd v C Ltd [2023] NZDT 672 (15 November 2023) [PDF, 105 KB]

    Contract / Misrepresentation / Applicant leased commercial unit to Respondent from 2017 / After a rent review the lease was terminated / Applicant initially claimed $7,166.83 in rental arrears including interest and legal costs / Applicant subsequently abandoned claim for interest and legal costs, but claimed refund of filing fee / Respondent counter-claimed $2,024.07 refund for a misrepresentation in the floor area / Held: Respondent not induced to enter into the contract due to the floor area being misrepresented / Respondent failed to provide any evidence to show loss suffered as a result / Applicant not entitled to a refund of filing fee / Respondent ordered to pay $5,852.55 / Claim allowed.

  3. BN v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 633 (2 November 2023) [PDF, 180 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased a sewing machine / Sewing machine was damaged when received by Applicant / Respondent admitted liability for damage / Respondent slow to respond but provided replacement value / Applicant claimed $532.30, $468.90 for replacement cost of sewing machine and $63.40 Tribunal filing claim and preparation cost / Held: Respondent liable for replacement value of sewing machine /  Respondent’s response was slow but by a narrow margin did not meet definition of costs for unnecessarily prolonged delays in proceedings / Claim for costs dismissed / Respondent ordered to pay $468.90 / Claim allowed in part.

  4. TT v UN [2023] NZDT 439 (21 September 2023) [PDF, 160 KB]

    Contract / Property / Applicant purchased house from Respondent / Following pre-settlement inspection Applicant sent list of issues to Respondent / Issues disputed and settlement proceeded / Applicant claimed $4,850 for attending to various items / Respondent counterclaimed for time off work responding to claim, and filing fee / Held: Any water leaking from connection points is at a very minor level / Hot water connection in laundry not in reasonable working order at settlement / Rangehood in reasonable working order / Insufficient evidence to prove there was a problem with the toilet / Respondent ordered to pay applicant $20 for breach of vendors’ warranty / Claim allowed in part / Counterclaim dismissed.

  5. NQ & OR v CN [2023] NZDT 436 (11 September 2023) [PDF, 250 KB]

    Contract / Property / Applicant sold property to Respondent / Respondent concerned whether property vacated and cleaned before settlement / Applicant and Respondent agreed Respondent to retain $5,000 from settlement until property vacated and cleaned to an acceptable standard / Applicant claimed $5,422.14 which includes retention amount, interest and penalty, and tribunal filing fee / Held: Respondent unable to claim for accommodation costs / No obligation on Applicant to clean property / Applicant not entitled to interest or penalty payment / Respondent not entitled to compensation for tribunal fee and legal fees / Respondent entitled to retain $200.05 for failure to provide possession in accordance with agreement / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $4,799.95 / Claim allowed.

  6. FN & NH v K Ltd & O Ltd [2023] NZDT 466 (25 August 2023) [PDF, 247 KB]

    Contract / Property development / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant wanted to carry out a two-lot subdivision on their property and contacted First Respondent to survey land / Second Respondent assisted with preparing and filing resource consent application / Applicant advised by different professional that up-front cost of stormwater drainage could be removed / Plan amended and resource consent varied based on amended plan / Applicant claimed $10,000 costs and losses on basis that amended plan was the correct way to do subdivision / Held: First Respondent had a duty to think about the best place to locate boundary to meet requirements and carry out subdivision in the most efficient manner / There was an option to carry out subdivision without the need for a right way easement / Respondent failed to exercise reasonable care and skill / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $5,421 / Claim allowed in part.

  7. DT v TX [2023] NZDT 291 (1 August 2023) [PDF, 149 KB]

    Contract / Applicant bought vehicle from Respondent / Contract contained clause allowing return of vehicle to Respondent and full refund to Applicant in certain circumstances / Applicant wished to return vehicle as a result of inspection / Applicant claimed $8,818 which included full refund, mechanical check fee and Disputes Tribunal filing fee / Held: Applicant entitled to full refund as vehicle was not well maintained as advertised / Applicant not entitled to mechanical check fee as it was carried out after purchase of vehicle / Applicant not entitled to Disputes Tribunal filing fee reimbursement / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $8,500 / Claim allowed in part.

  8. DT v TX [2023] NZDT 378 (1 August 2023) [PDF, 222 KB]

    Contract / Applicant purchased car from Respondent for $8500 / Contract included clause allowing car to be returned for refund if inspected by mechanic within week of purchase and found to be not as advertised, requiring repairs over $500 / Applicant had car inspected, number of issues discovered / Applicant tried to return car / Respondent unwilling to give full refund, claimed issues were minor / Applicant claimed $8818 for full purchase price, cost of mechanical check, refund of filing fee / Held: car not ‘well maintained’ as advertised / Cam belt issues alone required repairs over $500 / Respondent repudiated contract by refusing to accept return of car / Applicant entitled to return car and receive refund / Applicant not entitled to compensation for mechanical check or filing fee / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $8500 / Claim allowed.

  9. EN & ND v QI & MI [2023] NZDT 272 (21 July 2023) [PDF, 181 KB]

    Contract / Applicants purchased a house from Respondent / After settlement, Applicants discovered toilet did not work properly /  Plumber found drain was blocked by tree roots / Applicants asked Respondent to pay for repairs / Respondent did not pay / Applicants claimed toilet repair costs of $607.89 and filing fee / / Held: more likely than not that Respondent was responsible for repair cost / Pipes had tree roots interfering with them which had to be removed before pipes could be repaired / Suggested problem with the toilet was imminent and not in reasonable working order / Respondent breached their obligation by not paying for repairs / Tribunal unable to award costs for filing fee / Respondent ordered to pay Applicants $607.89 / Claim granted.

  10. JD v SL [2023] NZDT 364 (20 July 2023) [PDF, 185 KB]

    Negligence / Respondent drove into parked cars while driving Applicant’s car/ Respondent advised afterwards that he did not have a driver’s licence /Applicant’s car was not drivable and had to be towed away / Car was written off / Applicant’s car was insured for $5,000.00 / Insurance company would not accept claim as damage occurred when car was driven by an unlicensed driver / Respondent accepted liability for damage and agreed to pay for it at a sum of $85.00 per week / Respondent paid $425.00 before payments stopped / Applicant claimed $5,500.00 for loss of insured value of car, $280 for towing fee and $180 Tribunal filing fee / Held: Respondent failed to take reasonable care whilst driving / Car insured for $5,000.00 which was reasonable estimate of value of car / Towing should be deducted from amount owing as offset by amount of selling car wreck / Amount paid by Respondent should be deducted too / Filing fee cost cannot be claimed in the circumstances / Respondent ordered to pay …

  11. DT v KI [2023] NZDT 294 (19 July 2023) [PDF, 195 KB]

    Contract / Applicant provided lawn moving services to Respondent / Applicant said he was only paid for 5 out of 6 moving services provided to Respondent / Respondent disputed as to whether Applicant in fact mowed lawn / Applicant claimed $80 which included $35 unpaid lawn moving services and $45 filing fee / Held: Respondent had not proved more likely than not that his business mowed lawns of Applicant / Disputes Tribunal filing fee cannot be claimed / Claim dismissed.

  12. NQ v QC [2023] NZDT 328 (19 July 2023) [PDF, 118 KB]

    Legal fees / Applicant engaged Respondent to act on an employment matter / Respondent’s engagement letter provided fee estimate of $2,500 to $3,500 plus GST / Applicant paid 1,900.00 / Respondent issued a further invoice totalling $1,357.00 / Applicant’s employment settlement included contribution of $4,500 plus GST ($5,175.00) to Applicant’s legal fees by former employer / Applicant claimed payment covered total fee owed / Applicant claimed refund of $1,900.00 paid to Respondent and Tribunal application fee / Respondent claimed entitled to retain $1,900.00 / Respondent counterclaimed $1,456.67, for amount due plus interest / Held: amount paid by Applicant’s prior employer to Respondent exceeded fees payable / Respondent’s claim for filing fee not allowed / Respondent’s application for payment of additional fees dismissed / Respondent ordered to pay $1,900 / Claim allowed.

  13. JY v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 64 (17 July 2023) [PDF, 189 KB]

    Negligence / Applicant took vehicle to Respondent for WOF / Vehicle failed inspection / Respondent identified faults of water and oil in power steering and faulty brakes / Applicant states Respondent’s staff were unhelpful and did not supply a quote for repair costs / Applicant claims $825.13 for refund of the warrant cost and $40 Tribunal filing fee / Held: respondent was entitled to subcontract work / Applicant unable to provide evidence that work was not carried out with reasonable care and skill / Applicant not entitled to compensation because of poor customer service / Applicant not entitled to refund of Tribunal filing fee / Claim dismissed.

  14. QC v KN [2023] NZDT 426 (10 July 2023) [PDF, 217 KB]

    Contract / Tenancy / Parties entered into Tenant and Sublettee agreement / Applicant seeks repayment of bond, administration costs, filing fees for Tenancy and Disputes tribunals / Respondent disputes claim saying applicant didn’t undertake additional work around the property and damaged a wall / Held: applicant did not breach terms of agreement by not undertaking additional work and by putting two holes in the wall for a TV bracket / Respondent is a tenant not the landlord / No evidence from landlord that has made applicant liable for damaged caused to wall / No actual cost of damage caused to respondent / No breach / Outcome: claim allowed, respondent to pau applicant $800.00

  15. EO v UO & U Ltd [2023] NZDT 257 (30 June 2023) [PDF, 112 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant took campervan to Respondents for WOF / Respondents issued WOF / Applicant sold campervan for $19,800 / Purchaser took campervan for further WOF, extensive problems discovered, WOF not issued / Purchaser took action against Applicant in separate Disputes Tribunal claim, Applicant ordered to pay $17,066 in damages for repairs / Applicant now claimed $17,286 from Respondents, being reimbursement of damages order, $40 WOF fee, and $180 filing fee / Respondents acknowledged WOF should not have been issued / Held: insufficient evidence that WOF issued by Respondents directly resulted in campervan’s reduced value / Applicant’s loss not result of Respondent’s error, therefore not entitled to reimbursement of damages order / Costs award not available / Applicant entitled to reimbursement of WOF fee / Respondent ordered to pay $40 to Applicant / Claim granted in part.

  16. NS v OA Ltd [2023] NZDT 110 (26 June 2023).pdf [PDF, 180 KB]

    Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased vacuum cleaner from the Respondent with five-year warranty / Applicant returned vacuum to Respondent after it stopped turning on / Applicant claims $2,300 for the vacuum price and tribunal filing fee / Respondent claims they are not liable due to repairer report identifying liquid damage / Held: Respondent is not liable as the damage indicates the Applicant likely used vacuum in a manner inconsistent with its purpose / Disputes Tribunal application is not recoverable except in exceptional circumstances which do not apply here / Claim dismissed. 

  17. KW v NX [2023] NZDT 264 (20 June 2023) [PDF, 183 KB]

    Negligence / Respondent’s vehicle collided with Applicant, damaging his e-Scooter / Applicant claimed $430 for repairs, $240 for temporary transport costs, $955.50 for filing fee and hearing attendance costs, and $69.50 for medical costs / Held: Respondent failed to give way, was negligent / Applicant entitled to repair costs and some costs for alternate transport while waiting for repairs / Circumstances not met for costs award relating to filing fee or time spent attending hearing / Personal injury outside Tribunal’s jurisdiction, claim for medical costs struck out / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $510 / Claim allowed in part.

  18. BE v MG [2023] NZDT 262 (20 June 2023) [PDF, 186 KB]

    Contract / Respondent borrowed $29,000.00 from Applicant in loan agreement to purchase car with Respondent to make weekly repayments at unspecified amount / Respondent made several payments but $19,000.00 remaining to be paid / Applicant claimed $21,178.00, being unpaid loan principal, $550.00 default payment fee, $1,000.00 unpaid balance of previous loan, $448.00 mechanical work and $180.00 filing fee / Held: Respondent breached agreement by not paying loan by contracted date / Applicant entitled to repayment of principal / No evidence to prove other amounts claimed / Respondent to pay applicant $19,000.00 / Claim partially granted.

  19. SO v GU [2023] NZDT 326 (26 May 2023) [PDF, 156 KB]

    Contract / Applicant purchased property from Respondent / Subsequently, heat pump found to have a faulty indoor board / Part no longer available / Applicant claimed Respondent breached sale and purchase agreement / Applicant claimed $3,408.00, cost of getting new heat pump installed and filing fee costs / Respondent claimed heat pump was in reasonable working order on settlement date / Held: more likely than not the heat pump was not in reasonable working order / Applicant in breach of sale and purchase agreement / Heat pump was 15 years old  / Respondent order to pay Applicant $150 in compensation / Filing fee not awarded as not provided for in contract / Claim allowed in part.

  20. BS v MQ [2023] NZDT 269 (25 May 2023) [PDF, 171 KB]

    Contract / Applicant booked two tickets on a fishing charter run by Respondent / Tickets indicated departure time was 9am / Departure time was actually 7am / Morning of the booking, Respondent phoned Applicant to ask whether they going on charter / Applicant was unable to get to departure point promptly so did not go on trip / Respondent later provided a partial refund, retaining $60 per ticket to cover costs /  Applicant claimed $160, for ticket price and filing fee / Held: departure time on ticket was a misprint but the time formed part of terms and conditions of contract / Respondent did not provide the trip as contracted and Applicant received no part of what he paid for / Applicant entitled to a full refund / Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to award costs, including the filing fee, in these circumstances / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $120 / Claim granted.

  21. ET v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 223 (14 April 2023) [PDF, 195 KB]

    Negligence / Applicant’s trailer was damaged during delivery to Respondent / Applicant claimed damage was result of Respondent’s negligence / Applicant claimed $405 for repair, $1000 for stress and worry, $1000 for Applicant’s time, and $90 for Tribunal filing fee / Held: both parties accepted Respondent had already paid Applicant $405 for repair / Tribunal does not generally award costs for time, stress and worry / Limited circumstances for awarding costs not met / Claim dismissed.

You can try using these keywords to search the whole site.