You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results for Flatmate.

32 items matching your search terms

  1. NI & UX v EG [2025] NZDT 328 (29 September 2025) [PDF, 110 KB]

    Contract / Flatmate agreement / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Parties were co tenants in a fixed term tenancy under flatmate agreement / Respondent alleged safety concerns with other tenants so moved out before lease ended and stopped paying rent / Applicants claimed unpaid rent and costs / Respondent counterclaimed for return of bond / Held: Respondent’s concerns with other tenants did not amount to breach of contract / Respondent remained liable for rent until suitable replacement found / Applicants failed to mitigate own loss by unreasonably declining a replacement tenant / Respondent only liable for rent until suitable replacement was declined by Applicants / Respondent’s bond of $1,000 equalled the four weeks’ rent Respondent owed so Applicants could retain it / Claim allowed in part and counterclaim dismissed.

  2. OU v EH [2025] NZDT 418 (29 September 2025) [PDF, 183 KB]

    Tribunal jurisdiction / Applicant arranged to have the Respondent as their flatmate / Respondent resides overseas and is not a citizen or resident of New Zealand / Respondent paid $1,180 to Applicant for bond and one weeks rent / Respondent did not move in and stopped responding / Applicant sought $786.03 for unpaid rent, readvertisement fee, and filing fee /  Held: Claim struck out for want of jurisdiction / Rules for service outside of New Zealand at District Court would require more than email service on a Respondent / Disputes tribunal being lesser court is not able to affect a claim against an overseas Respondent in a manner that even the District Court cannot /  Claim dismissed.

  3. TI v LM [2025] NZDT 388 (04 September 2025) [PDF, 189 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant and Respondent signed a flatmate agreement / $440 bond paid that would be returned to Applicant unless there were costs incurred by Applicant / Applicant and Respondent had a disagreement about Applicant moving in washing machine / Respondent cancelled contract / Held: Having washing machine at house was not agreed in flatmate contract / Applicant was not entitled to cancel contract / Respondent to retain one weeks’ bond for compensation / Claim partially successful / Respondent to pay Applicant $220. 

  4. TP v BK [2025] NZDT 398 (14 August 2025) [PDF, 173 KB]

    Contract / Flatmate agreement / Applicant entered flatmate agreement with Respondent as head tenant / Applicant to pay $960 (one week’s rent and two weeks’ rent as bond) but only paid $700 with balance due on move-in date / No written flatmate agreement / Applicant encountered unusual and unsettling behaviour from flatmate / Applicant decided to move out and tried to contact Respondent but was unable to reach them / Applicant moved out that evening / Applicant claimed refund of $700 / Held: no evidence two-week notice period was agreed so reasonable notice period was one week / Notice period applied as contract not frustrated and no fundamental breach justifying immediate cancellation / Applicant’s interactions with flatmate not at threshold of risk to safety or property / Respondent provided no evidence that they were entitled to retain portion of bond / Respondent to pay Applicant $380 / Claim allowed in part.

  5. MA v ZD [2025] NZDT 428 (01 August 2025) [PDF, 134 KB]

    Property / Flatmate agreement / Applicant agreed to move into flat leased by Respondent / Applicant paid four weeks’ rent as bond / Before move-in date, dispute arose when Applicant requested flatmate agreement but Respondent refused to provide it / Respondent refused to allow Applicant to move in and refused to refund bond / Applicant claimed bond refund of $1,120 / Held: binding contract existed between Applicant and Respondent / Respondent breached contract by refusing to let Applicant move in and by failing to refund the bond / Payment was not a deposit to reserve the flat / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,120 / Claim allowed.

  6. DE & Ors v UX [2025] NZDT 113 (27 March 2025) [PDF, 185 KB]

    Contract / Fixed term lease / Applicants and Respondent are flatmates / Applicants said Respondent moved in for about five days before his sister took over / Respondent continued to pay for rent and stopped when his sister moved out / Applicants claimed $3,000 for rent arrears incurred when Respondent stopped paying rent / Held: there is an implied term in the agreement that Respondent would continue to pay rent if he or his sister moved out until the room was filled by someone else / Respondent breached his contract when he stopped paying rent / Respondent ordered to pay Applicants $2,340 / Claim allowed.

  7. KO v UQ [2025] NZDT 20 (30 January 2025) [PDF, 214 KB]

    Contract / Flatmate agreement / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA) / Applicant signed flatmate agreement with Respondent as head tenant and paid $1790 for bond and rent / Respondent gave notice to vacate tenancy before agreement commenced / Applicant cancelled agreement but Respondent refused to return amounts paid / Applicant claimed $1790 / Held: Respondent’s early termination breached implied essential term and Applicant would not have entered agreement if aware of imminent termination / Breach substantially reduced benefit and increased burden of contract on Applicant / Respondent’s offer to transfer lease no defence as it imposed substantially different obligations on Applicant / Tribunal held Applicant’s cancellation justified under s 36 or s 37 CCLA / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1260 as balance of amount not returned to Applicant.

  8. BG v KN [2024] NZDT 691 (4 November 2024) [PDF, 136 KB]

    Contract / Quasi contract / Property / Applicant and Respondent were flatmates / Applicant moved out of flat / Applicant refused to pay rent further than five weeks until Respondent found a new flatmate / Respondent reduced Applicant's bond / Applicant claimed rent and debt collector costs / Held: agreed in the flat that a flatmate remained liable to pay rent until a new flatmate was found / Therefore, Applicant obliged to pay all the rent until a new flatmate was found / Applicant's flatmates not liable to pay debt collection costs / Claim dismissed.

  9. HX v MT & OM [2024] NZDT 613 (26 August 2024) [PDF, 94 KB]

    Contract / Applicant moved into a flat rented by First Respondent / Applicant paid First Respondent a bond / When Applicant moved out, First Respondent retained an amount equivalent to one week’s rent from Applicant’s bond as Applicant had only given two weeks’ notice / Applicant brought claim for recovery of balance of bond / Applicant also claimed $45 additional rent he was asked to pay when another flatmate left, plus cost of filing claim / Held: notice period was not discussed when Applicant moved in / Three months later, First Respondent asked all flatmates to sign a flatmate sharing agreement containing a provision requiring four weeks’ notice to vacate / Applicant did not sign agreement / Applicant not bound by the agreement / Two weeks’ notice given by Applicant was reasonable / Applicant entitled to a refund of $215 balance of bond / Additional $45 was paid following agreement reached by all flatmates, not recoverable / Filing fee not recoverable in circumstances / First Respo…

  10. BW v BB [2024] NZDT 646 (20 August 2024) [PDF, 180 KB]

    Contract / Applicant entered agreement to be a flatmate at property where Respondent was the main tenant / Applicant said when she left the property her bond of $1,027.00 was not returned / Applicant claimed bond from Respondent / Respondent counterclaimed $11,711.86 for breach of contract and repair costs / Respondent claimed Applicant breached the agreement by moving out earlier than the agreed two-year fixed term / Respondent claimed she suffered loss as she had to make up the full rent amount and Applicant’s portion of the bills / Respondent also claimed Applicant caused damage to the walls in the room she occupied / Held: flatmate agreement was made verbally / No evidence that Applicant agreed to a fixed term / Evidence indicated the Applicant’s cat caused damage to the walls / Applicant liable for cost of repairing damage / Respondent entitled to deduct repair cost from bond, $920.00 / Applicant ordered to pay Respondent $107.00 remainder of the bond / Claim and counterclaim allo…

  11. DO v CH [2024] NZDT 576 (29 July 2024) [PDF, 189 KB]

    Property / Applicant was head tenant of a property / Respondent moved into the flatting situation and signed a fixed term agreement for three months / Within three weeks of moving in Respondent advised he wished to move out in two weeks / Applicant claimed Respondent owed him $2,700.00 because he did not stay for fixed term as agreed / Held: Respondent breached agreement by leaving flat before fixed term ended / Respondent was legally liable to pay rent until end of term / Respondent stated he wanted to leave early as the property was unsanitary, but failed to provide evidence / However, Applicant had a duty to mitigate losses by finding a new flatmate as quickly as possible / Actual loss suffered as a result of Respondent’s breach was loss of rent between when he moved out and when a new tenant moved in / Applicant did not provide enough evidence to prove he was unable to find replacement flatmate until end of fixed term agreement / Applicant failed to prove he suffered a loss and tha…

  12. LL v KN [2024] NZDT 369 (27 June 2024) [PDF, 173 KB]

    Contract / Applicant and Respondent entered into a flatmate agreement / When contract ended Respondent refused to refund Applicant’s bond due to concerns about damage to the house / Respondent submitted Applicant’s cats damaged the couch, a rug and some sheets and urinated in a leather duffel bag / Respondent also claimed Applicant dumped cat litter in the garden and removed a window stay / Applicant claimed for bond refund of $640.00 / Held: Applicant was likely responsible for some of the damage such as to the bag and window stay / Respondent not able to prove that he suffered any losses as a result of the damage / Fair that Applicant should contribute to paying to clean the bag and a replacement window stay / Applicant entitled to a bond refund minus $80 compensation to Respondent / Respondent ordered to pay $560.00 / Claim allowed in part.

  13. KT v EG [2024] NZDT 572 (28 May 2024) [PDF, 179 KB]

    Contract / Respondent, Applicant, and his partner were flatmates / Respondent was the head tenant and others entered into a flat sharing agreement with her / Applicant and his partner moved out after four weeks / Respondent returned five days rent, and after four weeks refunded most of Applicant’s bond, retaining $120.00 for cleaning and $38.00 for utilities / Applicant claimed $1,999.00 for balance of his bond, hardship, racism and harassment / Held: Tribunal cannot hear claims about racism or harassment / Under the contract Applicant and his partner were not obliged to pay anything further towards utilities / Insufficient evidence to establish who was responsible for specified spills and stains, as they were in common areas / Not proven that Applicant and his partner failed to leave the property reasonably clean / Respondent not entitled to retain $120.00 cleaning fee / Not appropriate to award damages for the failure to return the bond immediately / Respondent ordered to pay $158.00…

  14. KC & LC v BD [2024] NZDT 335 (16 May 2024) [PDF, 140 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicants and Respondent were flatmates / Respondent gave Applicants 14 days’ written notice to end arrangement per flat sharing agreement / After an incident, Applicants left property permanently / Applicants claimed $1,434.00 for rent paid in advance and storage fees / Held: insufficient evidence to support finding of actual or threatened physical violence by Respondent towards Applicants during incident which prompted them to move out / Unable to make finding that incident constituted breach of contract by Respondent entitling Applicants to end arrangement without notice / Respondent liable to pay Applicants $350 for rent paid in advance for period after expiry of Respondent’s notice period / Claim allowed in part.

  15. NH v TC [2024] NZDT 175 (7 March 2024) [PDF, 182 KB]

    Contract / Applicant and Respondent were flatmates / Respondent was the head tenant / Dispute arose over the bond paid by the Applicant / Applicant claims $540 being 3 weeks rent. One week bond was paid to the former flat mate she replaced, and she was liable for the 2 week delay in finding a replacement flat mate / Held: text message evidence proves there was some confusion around the payment to the previous flat mate but ultimately it was done on instruction from the Applicant / Dispute over the bond caused the delay in finding a replacement flat mate / Delay was not due to the respondent / Claim dismissed.

  16. IX v HO [2024] NZDT 90 (28 February 2024) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Tenancy / Parties were flatmates / Respondent was head tenant and Applicant was subtenant / Tenancy was fixed term but could be terminated early / Leaving tenant had responsibility of finding replacement tenant / Applicant asked for return of bond from Respondent / Respondent refused / Applicant claimed refund of $1,200 for bond and disruption / Held: Applicant had not breached contract and was entitled to the bond refund / Respondent breached contract by not refunding bond / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1200.00 / No evidence provided for inconvenience claim / Claim allowed in part.

  17. XQ v HM [2024] NZDT 140 (23 February 2024) [PDF, 167 KB]

    Contract / Applicant entered into flatmate agreement with Respondent / Applicant paid $500 bond / Respondent repeatedly queried Applicant’s financial circumstances prior to offering him the room / Once Respondent was satisfied with Applicant as a suitable flatmate, she sent the agreement to Applicant / Applicant signed agreement and paid $500 bond /  Parties agreed that Applicant would pay $750.00 for rent in advance / Later, Respondent further enquired about Applicant’s financial circumstances / Parties argued and Respondent cancelled contract / Respondent refunded Applicant’s $750.00 but refused to refund bond / Held: Respondent entitled to decide who may share her home with her / Unreasonable for Respondent to enter into contract with Applicant, receive payments and then cancel the contract on previously known information / Respondent ordered to pay $510.22, $500 refund and statutory interest / Claim allowed.

  18. MD v KC [2024] NZDT 41 (23 February 2024) [PDF, 227 KB]

    Contract / Parties were flatmates / Respondent as head tenant asked Applicant to leave the flat and have room professionally cleaned due to drug use / Applicant vacated property but failed to have room cleaned / Applicant claimed for return of $721 bond / Respondent counterclaimed for costs of having Applicant’s room cleaned and for security cameras purchased in response to threats allegedly made by Applicant / Held: implied agreement between parties that if Applicant used drugs inside the property, they were required to pay for professional cleaning to remove drug residue / Applicant not liable for cost of security cameras / Applicant required to pay $531.30 for cleaning, entitled to remaining $189.70 of bond / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $189.70 / Claim and counterclaim partially allowed.

  19. WD v NU & OT [2024] NZDT 38 (25 January 2024) [PDF, 129 KB]

    Contract / Applicant was a flatmate of the Respondents / Applicant paid a bond of $800 / When Applicant moved out, Respondents withheld the bond claiming the Applicant’s cat had damaged the sofa / Applicant claimed for bond refund and overpaid rent / Respondents counterclaimed for compensation for repair costs of the sofa / Held: claim that the cat caused damage to the sofa was not supported by evidence / Rent was found to be overpaid by seven days / Respondents ordered to pay Applicant $1040, bond and overpaid rent / Claim granted and counterclaim dismissed.

  20. LA v KZ [2023] NZDT 574 (14 November 2023) [PDF, 193 KB]

    Property / Applicant moved into a flat where Respondent was the head tenant / Parties signed a one year fixed contract / Applicant gave notice to move out after 2 weeks / Applicant claimed for bond refund, $1350.00 / Respondent counter-claimed for $608.00, cost of a new mattress / Held: Applicant breached agreement by giving notice weeks after signing fixed agreement / Applicant legally liable to pay rent for fixed term / Respondent had a duty to mitigate any losses suffered by finding a new flatmate / Only losses Applicant liable to pay were directly resulted from him ending the agreement early / Cost of a new mattress not Applicant’s cost to cover / Applicant allowed to retain equivalent of one week’s rent ($450.00) as compensation / Respondent ordered to pay $900, for rent compensation and part of bond / Claim allowed in part.

  21. BU & DQ v NN [2023] NZDT 281 (17 July 2023) [PDF, 105 KB]

    Contract / Tenancy / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant and Respondent lived together as flatmates and co-tenants / Respondent moved out before lease ended and stopped paying rent / Applicant claimed $15,000 for unpaid rent, expenses, damages for stress / Held: Respondent breached contract / Respondent obligated to pay until end of lease or until lease varied / Applicant made effort to minimise loss by finding new flatmate / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,256.49 / Respondent's counter-claim dismissed / Claim allowed in part.

  22. BS & OS v PB & UQ [2023] NZDT 271 (6 June 2023) [PDF, 120 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicants and Respondents were flatmates in fixed term tenancy / Respondents moved out 3 months before fixed term expired / Applicants had to cover rent until lease ended / Applicants claimed Respondents breached flatmate agreement, / Applicants sought damages for rent and end of lease costs / Applicant also claimed stress caused failure of exam, sought additional $2750 for cost of repeating course / Held: agreement existed between parties / Respondents breached agreement by not paying rent after moving out / Applicants tried to mitigate loss by seeking replacement flatmates, but were unsuccessful / Respondents required to pay for rent and end of lease costs / Applicant’s loss from failed exam was unforeseeable and too remote from breach to be claimable / Respondents ordered to pay $3263.25 and $2087, respectively / Claim allowed in part.

  23. IS v TM [2023] NZDT 270 (25 May 2023) [PDF, 186 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant moved into a flat in November 2020 / Applicant paid $760 bond to head tenant Respondent / Applicant understood flatmates were planning to remain in the property for a while / In early January 2021, Applicant was informed the landlord had given the tenants one month to vacate property due to missed rent payments / Applicant moved out and requested her bond returned, Respondent refused / Applicant claimed $7,720.00 for bond, moving costs, mental health strain, loss of personal property, and other costs / Held: Applicant entitled to full bond / Applicant would have incurred expenses of moving into one flat, but not the additional expenses of moving again so soon / Applicant entitled to cost of moving and into another flat, but not the costs of subsequent move / Tribunal cannot consider the claim for mental health strain / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,110.00, bond and moving costs / Claim granted in part.  

  24. BF v XX [2023] NZDT 245 (18 May 2023) [PDF, 197 KB]

    Contract / Applicant entered into a flat sharing agreement with Respondent / Flatmate agreement specified that the flatmates would pay 50% of the cost of expenses each week / Applicant’s puppy ate pain relief tablets in the Respondent’s room / There was an altercation between the Applicant and Respondent that resulted in a trespass ordered against Respondent / Applicant claimed compensation for expenses / Respondent is liable to pay 50% of expenses / Claim allowed / Respondent to pay Applicant $636.69.

You can try using these keywords to search the whole site.