You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results for Flatmates.

14 items matching your search terms

  1. BG v KN [2024] NZDT 691 (4 November 2024) [PDF, 136 KB]

    Contract / Quasi contract / Property / Applicant and Respondent were flatmates / Applicant moved out of flat / Applicant refused to pay rent further than five weeks until Respondent found a new flatmate / Respondent reduced Applicant's bond / Applicant claimed rent and debt collector costs / Held: agreed in the flat that a flatmate remained liable to pay rent until a new flatmate was found / Therefore, Applicant obliged to pay all the rent until a new flatmate was found / Applicant's flatmates not liable to pay debt collection costs / Claim dismissed.

  2. HX v MT & OM [2024] NZDT 613 (26 August 2024) [PDF, 94 KB]

    Contract / Applicant moved into a flat rented by First Respondent / Applicant paid First Respondent a bond / When Applicant moved out, First Respondent retained an amount equivalent to one week’s rent from Applicant’s bond as Applicant had only given two weeks’ notice / Applicant brought claim for recovery of balance of bond / Applicant also claimed $45 additional rent he was asked to pay when another flatmate left, plus cost of filing claim / Held: notice period was not discussed when Applicant moved in / Three months later, First Respondent asked all flatmates to sign a flatmate sharing agreement containing a provision requiring four weeks’ notice to vacate / Applicant did not sign agreement / Applicant not bound by the agreement / Two weeks’ notice given by Applicant was reasonable / Applicant entitled to a refund of $215 balance of bond / Additional $45 was paid following agreement reached by all flatmates, not recoverable / Filing fee not recoverable in circumstances / First Respo…

  3. KT v EG [2024] NZDT 572 (28 May 2024) [PDF, 179 KB]

    Contract / Respondent, Applicant, and his partner were flatmates / Respondent was the head tenant and others entered into a flat sharing agreement with her / Applicant and his partner moved out after four weeks / Respondent returned five days rent, and after four weeks refunded most of Applicant’s bond, retaining $120.00 for cleaning and $38.00 for utilities / Applicant claimed $1,999.00 for balance of his bond, hardship, racism and harassment / Held: Tribunal cannot hear claims about racism or harassment / Under the contract Applicant and his partner were not obliged to pay anything further towards utilities / Insufficient evidence to establish who was responsible for specified spills and stains, as they were in common areas / Not proven that Applicant and his partner failed to leave the property reasonably clean / Respondent not entitled to retain $120.00 cleaning fee / Not appropriate to award damages for the failure to return the bond immediately / Respondent ordered to pay $158.00…

  4. KC & LC v BD [2024] NZDT 335 (16 May 2024) [PDF, 140 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicants and Respondent were flatmates / Respondent gave Applicants 14 days’ written notice to end arrangement per flat sharing agreement / After an incident, Applicants left property permanently / Applicants claimed $1,434.00 for rent paid in advance and storage fees / Held: insufficient evidence to support finding of actual or threatened physical violence by Respondent towards Applicants during incident which prompted them to move out / Unable to make finding that incident constituted breach of contract by Respondent entitling Applicants to end arrangement without notice / Respondent liable to pay Applicants $350 for rent paid in advance for period after expiry of Respondent’s notice period / Claim allowed in part.

  5. NH v TC [2024] NZDT 175 (7 March 2024) [PDF, 182 KB]

    Contract / Applicant and Respondent were flatmates / Respondent was the head tenant / Dispute arose over the bond paid by the Applicant / Applicant claims $540 being 3 weeks rent. One week bond was paid to the former flat mate she replaced, and she was liable for the 2 week delay in finding a replacement flat mate / Held: text message evidence proves there was some confusion around the payment to the previous flat mate but ultimately it was done on instruction from the Applicant / Dispute over the bond caused the delay in finding a replacement flat mate / Delay was not due to the respondent / Claim dismissed.

  6. IX v HO [2024] NZDT 90 (28 February 2024) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Tenancy / Parties were flatmates / Respondent was head tenant and Applicant was subtenant / Tenancy was fixed term but could be terminated early / Leaving tenant had responsibility of finding replacement tenant / Applicant asked for return of bond from Respondent / Respondent refused / Applicant claimed refund of $1,200 for bond and disruption / Held: Applicant had not breached contract and was entitled to the bond refund / Respondent breached contract by not refunding bond / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1200.00 / No evidence provided for inconvenience claim / Claim allowed in part.

  7. MD v KC [2024] NZDT 41 (23 February 2024) [PDF, 227 KB]

    Contract / Parties were flatmates / Respondent as head tenant asked Applicant to leave the flat and have room professionally cleaned due to drug use / Applicant vacated property but failed to have room cleaned / Applicant claimed for return of $721 bond / Respondent counterclaimed for costs of having Applicant’s room cleaned and for security cameras purchased in response to threats allegedly made by Applicant / Held: implied agreement between parties that if Applicant used drugs inside the property, they were required to pay for professional cleaning to remove drug residue / Applicant not liable for cost of security cameras / Applicant required to pay $531.30 for cleaning, entitled to remaining $189.70 of bond / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $189.70 / Claim and counterclaim partially allowed.

  8. BU & DQ v NN [2023] NZDT 281 (17 July 2023) [PDF, 105 KB]

    Contract / Tenancy / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant and Respondent lived together as flatmates and co-tenants / Respondent moved out before lease ended and stopped paying rent / Applicant claimed $15,000 for unpaid rent, expenses, damages for stress / Held: Respondent breached contract / Respondent obligated to pay until end of lease or until lease varied / Applicant made effort to minimise loss by finding new flatmate / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,256.49 / Respondent's counter-claim dismissed / Claim allowed in part.

  9. BS & OS v PB & UQ [2023] NZDT 271 (6 June 2023) [PDF, 120 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicants and Respondents were flatmates in fixed term tenancy / Respondents moved out 3 months before fixed term expired / Applicants had to cover rent until lease ended / Applicants claimed Respondents breached flatmate agreement, / Applicants sought damages for rent and end of lease costs / Applicant also claimed stress caused failure of exam, sought additional $2750 for cost of repeating course / Held: agreement existed between parties / Respondents breached agreement by not paying rent after moving out / Applicants tried to mitigate loss by seeking replacement flatmates, but were unsuccessful / Respondents required to pay for rent and end of lease costs / Applicant’s loss from failed exam was unforeseeable and too remote from breach to be claimable / Respondents ordered to pay $3263.25 and $2087, respectively / Claim allowed in part.

  10. IS v TM [2023] NZDT 270 (25 May 2023) [PDF, 186 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant moved into a flat in November 2020 / Applicant paid $760 bond to head tenant Respondent / Applicant understood flatmates were planning to remain in the property for a while / In early January 2021, Applicant was informed the landlord had given the tenants one month to vacate property due to missed rent payments / Applicant moved out and requested her bond returned, Respondent refused / Applicant claimed $7,720.00 for bond, moving costs, mental health strain, loss of personal property, and other costs / Held: Applicant entitled to full bond / Applicant would have incurred expenses of moving into one flat, but not the additional expenses of moving again so soon / Applicant entitled to cost of moving and into another flat, but not the costs of subsequent move / Tribunal cannot consider the claim for mental health strain / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,110.00, bond and moving costs / Claim granted in part.  

  11. BF v XX [2023] NZDT 245 (18 May 2023) [PDF, 197 KB]

    Contract / Applicant entered into a flat sharing agreement with Respondent / Flatmate agreement specified that the flatmates would pay 50% of the cost of expenses each week / Applicant’s puppy ate pain relief tablets in the Respondent’s room / There was an altercation between the Applicant and Respondent that resulted in a trespass ordered against Respondent / Applicant claimed compensation for expenses / Respondent is liable to pay 50% of expenses / Claim allowed / Respondent to pay Applicant $636.69.

  12. CL v ND [2023] NZDT 12 (8 February 2023) [PDF, 194 KB]

    Contract / Applicant and Respondent were flatmates / They signed an agreement under which the Applicant was the head tenant / Weekly rent was $200.00 and bond was $4000.00 / Under the agreement, Respondent obliged to give 14 days’ notice if he wished to vacate the property / Applicant claimed the Respondent left without giving the required period of notice, and claimed for unpaid rent / Respondent stated that he informed the Applicant that intended to leave the flat, which he did on that day / Respondent outlined reasons he left the property including lack of cleanliness, noise concerns and flatmates having covid / Applicant said that Respondent had never complained about these issues / Applicant claimed $685.71 for unpaid rent / Held: Respondent lived at the property for six months without complaining about its condition / Flatmates who share a property may have different standards as far as cleanliness and noise are concerned, and some reasonable negotiation would be expected before …

  13. OX v ND [2022] NZDT 62 (29 June 2022) [PDF, 111 KB]

    Contract / Parties were flatmates / Respondent was head tenant / Parties signed renting agreement / Applicant had physical altercation with Respondent’s partner / Respondent was not willing to allow Applicant to return to property / Applicant obtained the intervention of the Police who obliged Respondent to return Applicant’s possessions / Applicant did not remove his possessions from his room until a month later /  To pay rent while room was unable to be let to someone else Respondent kept Applicant’s bond of $570.00 / Applicant claimed for return of bond payment subject to renting agreement / Whether either party breached contract / If so, what if any damages or compensation was payable / Held: Applicant not entitled to refund of his bond because it was used to pay for unpaid rent / If the Applicant had taken his possessions away earlier then the bond would almost certainly have been refundable / Applicant’s personal circumstances did not make any difference to his obligation to pay …

You can try using these keywords to search the whole site.