You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results

2564 items matching your search terms

  1. O Ltd v U Ltd & Z Ltd [2023] NZDT 655 (5 December 2023) [PDF, 122 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased truck and trailer from First Respondent / Applicant alleged vehicle faulty in many respects / Applicant claimed $29,000 for various repairs / Held: Applicant has no legal basis to hold Respondent liable for quality or fitness purpose issues, even if proven, as this is a private sale / Applicant has legal basis for a claim in respect of defects Respondent should have identified and failed in assessment / Applicant can be awarded compensation for cost and fitting of compressor, repairs to trailer and headlight adjustment / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,865.90 / Claim allowed in part.

  2. DI v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 583 (5 December 2023) [PDF, 215 KB]

    Contract / Applicant purchased a bike from Respondent / Bike failed while been ridden and sustained frame damage / Applicant claimed bike not fit for purpose / Applicant sought a refund of purchase price / Held: bike was designed and sold for lower level advanced and intermediate trail riding / Damage sustained not consistent with normal use on lower and intermediate trails / Not established that bike was not fit for purpose / Claim dismissed.  

  3. BR & SR v LD & BD [2023] NZDT 740 (4 December 2023) [PDF, 212 KB]

    Nuisance / Fencing Act 1978 / Parties discussed boundary fence between properties / Respondents thought they reached agreement and built fence on own land inside boundary / Applicants claim fence interferes with their right to enjoy,  object to height, consider it unsightly, allege it obscures safe vehicle exit / Applicants claim for order that fence be removed and new jointly agreed fence built / Held: parties chose not to utilise Fencing Act dispute resolution process / Fencing Act cannot be applied / No nuisance created / Cannot decide claim about trespass / Outcome: claim and counterclaim dismissed

  4. LN v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 717 (4 December 2023) [PDF, 169 KB]

    Contract / Applicant paid fees to Respondent for training course / Applicant claimed she was denied attendance due to Covid mandates, sought refund of fees / Held: evidence did not support Applicant’s claim she was denied access / After mandate was lifted, Applicant had about four years to opt in to training opportunities, was encouraged by Respondent to do so / Applicant’s non-attendance most likely due to change of mind and circumstances, not any failure by Respondent / Contract also included “Force Majeure” clause that Respondent would not be liable for any failures of obligations caused by events outside its reasonable control / Claim dismissed.

  5. BC v KC [2023] NZDT 625 (4 December 2023) [PDF, 115 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant took his vehicle gearbox to the Respondent to repair because it was slipping out of gear / Applicant sought $3,778.11 from Respondent for repair cost of gear box and removal and installation of gearbox by a third party / Held: insufficient evidence Respondent failed to provide service with reasonable care and skill / Respondent’s work was fit for purpose, as the gearbox issue was fixed when it left his workshop / Applicant not entitled to compensation as there was no failure requiring remediation / Claim dismissed.

  6. KE v OT & NT [2023] NZDT 594 (4 December 2023) [PDF, 249 KB]

    Contract law / Deed of Gift / Applicant is the executor of the estate of his late father, Q / Q lived with and was for by the respondents / the arrangement was underpinned by a Deed of Gift from Q to the respondents / Applicant brings a claim ordering respondent to pay him the sum of $28,275.35 that was allegedly improperly taken from his late father by the respondents / Held: the deed of gift was not intended to be a contract therefore the Disputes Tribunal does not have the required jurisdiction to determine the application / Claim is struck out.

  7. KM v IA & KA [2023] NZDT 787 (1 December 2023) [PDF, 184 KB]

    Unjust enrichment / International money transfer / Applicant arranged to send $15,000.00 overseas via a contact person online / Applicant provided bank account details to contact person / Applicant instructed to give the money in cash it to Respondents at a restaurant / First Respondent then phoned contact person to confirm $15,000.00 had been received / First Respondent asked Applicant to wait while contact person transferred the money to designated account / Applicant’s father stated that he had not received the transfer / Applicant asked to cancel the deal and get her money back, but First Respondent advised money had already been transferred  / Applicant sought recovery of $15,000.00 / Held: First Respondent and Second Respondent received the money from Applicant / Neither First or Second Respondent had the right to retain the money or to pass it on to contact person / Likely that the First and Second Respondents knowingly played a part in a scam / At the very least, First and Seco…

  8. QL v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 752 (1 December 2023) [PDF, 182 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased two jackets from the Respondent / 1 year later, Applicant noticed damage to one of the jackets and sought a warranty claim / Warranty claim was declined as determined damage was not due to a defect / Applicant sought $1,350.00 / Held: timing and nature of damage indicated damage likely occurred during ownership and use / Goods not defective at time of purchase / Applicant not entitled to a replacement jacket / Claim dismissed.

  9. E Ltd v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 721 (1 December 2023) [PDF, 92 KB]

    Contract / Applicant purchased timber from Respondent / Respondent supplied treated timber for decks and stairs that were built in Applicant’s property development / Later during building of decks apparent that the timber shade did not match / Testing indicated timber supplied was not requested treated timber / Applicant claimed for $30,000.00 / Held: Applicant believed he was being supplied type of treated timber he had purchased / Evidence indicated Applicant was not supplied correct timber / Breach of contract established by evidence / Costs presented were reasonable for remedial work required / Respondent ordered to pay $30,000.00 / Claim allowed.

  10. TN v K Ltd [2023] NZDT 649 (1 December 2023) [PDF, 180 KB]

    Consumer law / Applicant engaged Respondent to rebuild car engine / Job cost $14,012.97 / Applicant relocated for work, stored car with friend / Friend took car for drive, car broke down / Respondent assessed engine, found it badly damaged from severe overheating / Applicant claimed engine failure connected to Respondent’s previous rebuild, sought refund / Held: evidence suggested engine failure caused by coolant loss due to punctured coolant hose / Not plausible damage was present at time of engine rebuild / Claim dismissed.

  11. BQ v ST [2023] NZDT 609 (1 December 2023) [PDF, 177 KB]

    Loan / Applicant and Respondent were friends / Applicant made multiple payments to Respondent / Applicant submitted payments were loans and Respondent promised to pay him back / Noted that Respondent loaned the Applicant his game console / Parties no longer in contact / Held: Applicant proved he made loans to Respondent of $20,760.00 / Outstanding balance of loan was $11,410.00 / No proven repayment terms so loan was repayable upon demand / Applicant likely to retain console so value can deducted from outstanding loan amount / Respondent ordered to pay $12,900.00 / Claim allowed.

  12. Q Ltd v F Ltd [2023] NZDT 659 (30 November 2023) [PDF, 126 KB]

    Contract law / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Respondent ordered louvre roof from Applicant including installation / Respondent advised Applicant measurements for custom built flashings / Applicant revised invoice to reflect agreement reached relating to flashing / Respondent has not paid revised invoice amount of $16,339.00 / Applicant claimed damages / Held: louvre roof supplied was of acceptable quality / Respondent breached terms of contract by not paying invoice despite being supplied louvre roof / Applicant cannot claim debt recovery costs / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $16,339.20 / Claim allowed in part.

  13. IM Ltd v HI [2023] NZDT 566 (30 November 2023) [PDF, 106 KB]

    Contract / Respondent engaged Applicant’s legal services / Respondent failed to pay Applicant’s $5,836.37 invoice / Applicant claimed $7,762.27 comprising invoice, $817.41 interest, and $1,108.49 for debt recovery / Held: Respondent was contractually bound to pay invoice / Contract included clause that 12% interest would be payable on overdue accounts, therefore Respondent also liable for interest / Debt recovery costs not recoverable in this instance / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $6,653.78 / Claim allowed.

  14. LQ & QQ v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 463 (30 November 2023) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant accepted quotation from Respondent for landscaping work and artificial turf installation / Applicant unhappy with shiny appearance of turf and claimed that it should have been laid in the opposite direction / Applicant claimed $6,000 damages / Held: Respondent should have consulted with Applicant regarding which way to lay turf and explained the difference if it were not raised by Applicant / Respondent failed to install turf with reasonable care and skill / Damages payable reduced by unpaid balance owing to Respondent / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,275.07 / Claim allowed.

  15. BE v IC [2023] NZDT 646 (29 November 2023) [PDF, 145 KB]

    Contract / Misrepresentation / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased vehicle from Respondent for $3,800 / Respondent represented vehicle as being in great condition with no major issues / Transmission issues arose soon after purchase, mechanic advised Applicant repairs would cost $2,000–$3,000 / Applicant decided to sell car, explained fault in advertisement, received $1,800 / Applicant claimed $2,000 for loss suffered in sale, $120 for mechanics report, $90 for filing fee / Held: Respondent misrepresented vehicle, appeared to have deliberately concealed fault / Applicant entitled to compensation for losses suffered, but circumstances not met for costs award / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $2,120 / Claim allowed.

  16. EX v HC [2023] NZDT 631 (29 November 2023) [PDF, 103 KB]

    Contract / Applicant wished to purchase car from Respondent / As that car was about to be sold, Respondent offered Applicant another car which was the same make and model / Applicant paid $1,000.00 deposit with full purchase price being payable on conditions being met, including completion of a satisfactory car service by a third party dealer / Applicant was not happy with the car service / Applicant claimed deposit refund / Held: Applicant’s agreement to purchase car was conditional / As Applicant’s condition was not met, Respondent must refund $1,000.00 deposit / Claim allowed

  17. IT Ltd v HI Ltd [2023] NZDT 572 (29 November 2023) [PDF, 93 KB]

    Contract / Respondent engaged Applicant’s recruitment services, Applicant supplied carpenter / Respondent failed to pay number of Applicant’s invoices / Respondent complained carpenter damaged a door, invoiced Applicant $845.79 for damage / Applicant deducted $467.79 from final invoice for damage, but balance of $2,257.71 remained unpaid along with older invoices / Applicant engaged debt collector, Respondent paid older invoices but not final invoice / Applicant claimed for outstanding invoice plus interest and collection costs / Held: contract stated Applicant not liable for damage caused by workers, Respondent not entitled to have any further amount waived for damaged door / Contract provided for 15% interest plus collection costs for overdue debts / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,098.74, being outstanding invoice, $141.03 interest, and $700 collection costs / Claim allowed.

  18. UV v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 618 (28 November 2023) [PDF, 181 KB]

    Montreal Convention / Damage of baggage / Applicant checked in stroller for flight / Stroller did not arrive and was later returned in a damaged state / Whether airline responsible for the baggage delay and damage / Whether Applicant entitled to sum claimed / Applicant reported damaged with the requisite period / No supporting evidence that stroller had been checked in already damaged / Evidence that sun visor had been torn off / No evidence that stroller could be easily repaired / Loss assessed at $2,000 / Claim allowed

  19. QI & UD v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 636 (28 November 2023) [PDF, 175 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicants engaged Respondent to plaster rooms for $6,694.35 / Applicants unhappy with quality of work / Applicant had work assessed by a qualified plaster, who performed remedial work / Applicants claimed $3,900.00 for partial refund and $400 for extra sealant needed for remedial work / Held: plastering work not provided with reasonable care and skill / Failure was of substantial character / Applicants entitled to a full refund / Applicants considered full refund would be punitive and only claimed partial refund of $3,500.00 / Respondent ordered to pay $3,900.00, partial refund and cost of sealant / Claim allowed.

  20. ZC v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 573 (28 November 2023) [PDF, 200 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased a second hand bus from Respondent / Applicant intended to convert bus into a house bus / Applicant encountered multiple defects and paid $7099.53 for repairs and $514 for camp ground expenses/ Applicant claimed for repayment of expenses / Held: Applicant did not purchase bus as consumer and not entitled to protection under the CGA / No warranties relating to quality or fitness for purpose implied in contract of sale / Claim dismissed.

  21. DS Ltd v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 565 (28 November 2023) [PDF, 181 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Fair Trading Act 1986 / Respondent engaged Applicant’s recruitment services / Respondent agreed to hire candidate referred by Applicant as temp worker, candidate would be employed by Applicant / Respondent failed to pay Applicant’s last five invoices / Applicant claimed $14,000.97 in outstanding invoices / Respondent counter-claimed $30,000 in damages for losses sustained due to candidate’s actions or omissions, alleged Applicant misrepresented candidate’s abilities / Held: Respondent was not induced to engage candidate by any misleading conduct from Applicant / Respondent contractually obliged to pay Applicant’s invoices regardless of issues with candidate’s work / Contract excluded liability for losses arising from candidate’s performance / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $14,000.97 / Claim allowed, counter-claim dismissed.

  22. TF v NX Ltd & TQ [2023] NZDT 760 (27 November 2023) [PDF, 104 KB]

    Consumer Law / Fair Trading Act 1986 / Applicant sought to purchase outboard motor from Respondent / Respondent advised motor was available if Applicant paid $2,000 deposit / Applicant paid deposit / After delay, Respondent advised motor was being shipped and would arrive soon / Motor never arrived / Respondent failed to respond to contact until Applicant involved Police / Applicant sought refund of deposit / Held: Respondent engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct / Respondent insolvent and not in a position to deliver contracted goods when contract was formed / Deception continued with Respondent providing false assurances to Applicant and Police / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $2000 / Claim allowed.