You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results

2629 items matching your search terms

  1. BP v TD [2023] NZDT 259 (25 May 2023) [PDF, 214 KB]

    Contract / Applicant agreed to buy Respondent’s boat / Applicant paid $13,500 deposit and took possession / Applicant unable to pay rest of purchase price within agreed time / Parties agreed to end contract / Applicant returned boat / Written agreement did not specify whether deposit was refundable, or what would happen if sale was not completed / Applicant claimed refund of deposit / Respondent counterclaimed $30,000 for damage and rent, but withdrew counterclaim at hearing / Held: evidence evenly balanced, but Applicant did not successfully establish that parties agreed deposit would be refundable / Not unconscionable for Respondent to retain deposit / Claim and counterclaim dismissed.

  2. N Ltd v SH [2023] NZDT 295 (24 May 2023) [PDF, 126 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant contracted by Respondent to provide truck and two movers / Respondent failed to inform Applicant of heavy double door fridge that required more than two people to move / Applicant sent out additional crew and invoiced higher rate, which Respondent refused to pay / Applicant claimed payment of $2,033.00 invoice / Held: Respondent liable for remainder of invoice / Respondent not entitled to compensation from Applicant regarding alleged damage to property / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,670.70 / Claim allowed.

  3. O Ltd v TO [2023] NZDT 341 (24 May 2023) [PDF, 169 KB]

    Contract / Respondent was bringing claim with respect to bathroom renovations / Respondent accidentally named applicant as the party in this matter / Applicant’s director is a different person to who renovated the bathroom / Respondent accepted prior to hearing that she named wrong person / Applicants wish to pursue costs for preparation of evidence / Held: s 43 Disputes Tribunals Act 1988 bars award of costs except in limited circumstances that do not apply here / Applicant could just have let respondent know she had named wrong party / Claim dismissed.

  4. NT v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 299 (24 May 2023) [PDF, 186 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased a designer jacket for $3,601.78 / Jacket was drycleaned by Respondent / Jacket was returned damaged after drycleaning / Applicant sought cost of jacket / Held: Respondent did not follow jacket lapel instructions / Damaging jacket by washing it and not following the label instructions was foreseeable and direct loss / Respondent ordered to pay $3,686.78, jacket and drycleaning cost / Applicant entitled to jacket but did not want it due to damage / Claim allowed.

  5. LT v OT Ltd [2023] NZDT 356 (23 May 2023) [PDF, 185 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased sofa from Respondent / At delivery, sofa was unable to fit through access points to Applicant’s house / Applicant told Respondent she no longer wanted sofa / Applicant claimed $2600 refund of amounts paid for sofa and delivery / Held: Applicant repudiated contract / Respondent entitled to cancel contract and seek damages for Applicant’s repudiation / Terms of sale relevant, provided that Respondent was able to retain deposit plus cancellation fee / Respondent entitled to retain reasonable deposit, delivery fee, and cancellation fee, but not full purchase price / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $2114.10 refund / Claim allowed.

  6. K Ltd v SG [2023] NZDT 211 (23 May 2023) [PDF, 92 KB]

    Contract / Applicant owns interest in claim against Respondent / Respondent was director of a company that had contract to use telephone services / The company was removed from Companies Register / Telephone services were provided for a further three months / Applicant claims costs of services for that three month period against Respondent as they consider her to be personally liable / Held: respondent did not contract in her own name for telephone services, nor was she a guarantor / Contracting party was therefore a company / Claim dismissed.

  7. DC v KN [2023] NZDT 309 (22 May 2023) [PDF, 178 KB]

    Contract / Applicant and her then partner Respondent and another signed a fixed lease for a two bedroom property / Each agreed to pay $230.00 per week for rent / Respondent moved out without notice and stopped paying rent / Applicant and other tenant carried on covering rent in Respondent’s absence / Applicant claimed $4,600.00 for unpaid rent / Held: Respondent breached agreement by not paying rent after he moved out and the other tenants having had to cover the shortfall / Respondent obliged to pay rent to the end of the lease / Not reasonable in the circumstances for Applicant to be required to get another tenant / Respondent ordered to pay $3,220.00, factoring in miscalculation of amount owing by Applicant / Claim allowed.

  8. NJ v UF [2023] NZDT 238 (22 May 2023) [PDF, 247 KB]

    Contract / Misrepresentation / Applicant purchased horse from Respondent / Respondent represented that horse was suitable for a nervous young rider / Horse began to rear soon after delivery / Respondent did not disclose that horse had reared with previous owner / Respondent was aware of this previous behaviour / Held: horse not suitable for a nervous young rider and was not “nice and quiet” as stated in advertisement / Respondent to pay $4000 to Applicant for misrepresentation / Applicant may keep or sell horse as she sees fit  

  9. LZ v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 174 (22 May 2023) [PDF, 178 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased fishing drone from Respondent that included product care replacement option and promotional gift cards / Fishing drone did not function and could not be repaired or replaced / Applicant claimed $5,100 / Held: Applicant entitled to refund of purchase price including product care / Applicant not obligated to return value of gift cards / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $5,100 / Claim allowed.

  10. TX v V Ltd [2023] NZDT 227 (22 May 2023) [PDF, 150 KB]

    Contract / Applicant sold real estate for Respondent / Contract between parties stated Applicant would retain right to commission for listings sold within six months of terminating contract / Applicant claimed commission of $29,612 for four properties sold after terminating contract with Respondent / Respondent disputed Applicant’s entitlement to commission, claimed sales went unconditional more than six months after Applicant left company / Held: evidence Applicant relied on regarding when sales closed unreliable / More likely than not that sales went unconditional more than six months after Applicant left company / Claim dismissed.

  11. L Ltd v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 197 (19 May 2023) [PDF, 172 KB]

    Contract / Conditional contract / Applicant requested Respondent to provide quotation for house removal / Respondent's initial quotation based on assumption that concrete base around house was hollow but it was entirely concrete / Applicant did not accept new quotation / Respondent partially refunded and retained $5,000 deposit / Applicant claimed remaining deposit / Held: not appropriate for Respondent to bear entire risk as both Applicant and Respondent could have waited for property to be available before agreeing on quotation / Condition placed on quotation not met / New contract with different scope and price was not formed as Applicant did not accept quotation / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $2,493 / Claim partially allowed.

  12. NC & DC v T Ltd & HG [2023] NZDT 222 (19 May 2023) [PDF, 198 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicants owned rental property / Applicants’ property manager engaged Respondent for work on Applicants’ property / Applicants paid initial $3000 towards Respondent’s work / Property manager cancelled Respondent’s work at Applicants’ property after issues with Respondent’s work on other properties managed by property manager / Applicants claimed refund of $3000 and 14.5% interest / Held: contract was between Applicant and Respondent, not Respondent and property manager / Contract was cancelled, work was not carried out / Applicants entitled to refund / Applicants entitled to interest, but 14.5% rate unreasonable / Respondent ordered to pay Applicants $3000 plus $100.25 interest / Claim allowed.  

  13. BF v XX [2023] NZDT 245 (18 May 2023) [PDF, 197 KB]

    Contract / Applicant entered into a flat sharing agreement with Respondent / Flatmate agreement specified that the flatmates would pay 50% of the cost of expenses each week / Applicant’s puppy ate pain relief tablets in the Respondent’s room / There was an altercation between the Applicant and Respondent that resulted in a trespass ordered against Respondent / Applicant claimed compensation for expenses / Respondent is liable to pay 50% of expenses / Claim allowed / Respondent to pay Applicant $636.69.

  14. EM v JJ [2023] NZDT 254 (17 May 2023) [PDF, 89 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Motor Vehicle Sales Act 2003 / Applicant purchased second-hand vehicle from Respondent for $11,000 / Respondent claimed repairs had recently been done / Vehicle broke down on way home from purchase / Applicant discovered Respondent bought vehicle only 6 days prior for $6000, price reflected repairs needed / Applicant produced evidence Respondent was in trade / Applicant claimed refund / Held: Respondent was a motor vehicle trader, although not registered or licensed / Respondent therefore subject to consumer legislation / Vehicle not of acceptable quality / Applicant entitled to cancel sale and obtain refund / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $11,000 / Claim allowed.

  15. LL v XX [2023] NZDT 219 (17 May 2023) [PDF, 112 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant worked on Respondent’s car / Applicant claimed $7,000 payment for work remained outstanding / Respondent claimed payment had been made / Respondent counterclaimed that Applicant’s work was not of acceptable quality / Held: more likely than not that Respondent had paid Applicant for work in cash / Evidence did not establish that Applicant’s work was not of acceptable quality / Claim and counterclaim dismissed.

  16. BG v L Ltd [2023] NZDT 249 (16 May 2023) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant is professional piano teacher and brought digital piano from Respondent for business purposes / Over next 3 years, Applicant returned piano to Respondent numerous times to discuss complaints / Applicant identified 7 return trips from her home to Respondent / Applicant claimed $1,812.00 for cost of travel, as well back therapist costs as she suffered injury carrying piano  / Held: on only one occasion was there breach of guarantee as to fitness for purpose or acceptable quality / Piano was returned in functional state and remains so today / Personal injury claim is exclusively for ACC / Costs for two return trips is allowed / Respondent must pay Applicant $78.98 / Claim partially granted.

  17. N Ltd v TT [2023] NZDT 224 (16 May 2023) [PDF, 91 KB]

    Res judicata / Applicant brought action against Respondent / Matter had already come before Tribunal a year earlier / Applicant did not attend earlier hearing, matter was dismissed / Applicant had not been able to attend earlier hearing for medical reasons, therefore claimed matter had not been heard / Held: parties cannot relitigate questions that have already been judicially determined / Matter had already been heard and Applicant had not applied for re-hearing / Claim struck out.

  18. J Ltd v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 315 (15 May 2023) [PDF, 109 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant engaged Respondent to transport two consignments of planks / Respondent delivered one consignment, comprising three packets of planks, to wrong recipient / Recipient used two packets before realising error and returning third packet / Missing packets had to be replaced by Applicant for intended recipient / Applicant claimed $23,585.34 compensation / Held: contract between parties was contract of limited carrier liability / Goods went missing while Respondent responsible for them / Respondent liable for missing goods / In contracts of limited carrier liability, the legislation limited liability to $2000 per unit of goods damaged / Applicant entitled to $2000 for each packet delivered in error by Respondent / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $4000 / Claim allowed.

  19. BW v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 208 (12 May 2023) [PDF, 180 KB]

    Consumers Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant contacted Respondent regarding services they could provide regarding black mould removal / Applicant claims she did not receive a scope of work or a quote / Applicant notes Respondent did not recommend a registered building surveyor to carry out inspection services / Respondent claims that it was made clear to Applicant that she would not receive a report of scope and costings / Applicant has claimed breach of care and skill / Held: Applicant did not prove that Respondent had breached care and skill in carrying out a maintenance survey / Contract was not breached regarding house inspection / Claim and counter claim dismissed.

  20. DT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 225 (12 May 2023) [PDF, 169 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant engaged Respondent for drainage services in 2019, paid $17,720.36 for work / Services were to redo work done by previous team after Applicant noticed water seepage into home / Heavy rain in 2022 caused flooding into Applicant’s home / Applicant claimed flooding was result of Respondent’s work, sought $20,000 compensation / Held: more likely than not that Respondent’s work was not cause of flooding / Respondent’s work done with reasonable care and skill, but Respondent should have done more to check work of previous team / Applicant did not give Respondent reasonable opportunity to remedy issue / Claim dismissed.