You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results

1773 items matching your search terms

  1. KB v KP [2023] NZDT 184 (13 June 2023) [PDF, 104 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased bike from Respondent / Applicant took bike to original retailer for repairs / Retailer told Applicant bike had been stolen from them so was not covered by warranty / Applicant claimed refund from Respondent / Held: bike most likely stolen from original retailer before it was sold to Respondent / Buyers of stolen goods cannot obtain or pass on title / Implied condition of sale that seller has right to sell goods / Applicant entitled to cancel contract with Respondent and obtain refund / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $7,700 / Claim allowed.

  2. KI v CT [2023] NZDT 125 (13 June 2023) [PDF, 214 KB]

    Contract / Misrepresentation / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant brought caravan from Respondent advertised as “watertight” / Caravan was subsequently found to have serious water ingress problem / Applicant seeks damages for required repairs / Respondent disputes there was rot / Respondent claims Applicant chose not to inspect the caravan which was sold “as is” / Held: Respondents advertisement of caravan as being “watertight” was a misrepresentation / The use of words “as is” do not exclude the Respondent from liability / Wording of the advertisement was an inducement / Applicant would likely have not entered into contract if they had known of its real condition / Respondent liable to pay Applicant $4,473.50 for repairs / Claim granted.

  3. DN v C Ltd & D Ltd [2023] NZDT 283 (12 July 2023) [PDF, 207 KB]

    Contract / Applicant had vehicle repaired by Respondent / During repair Respondent loaned applicant courtesy vehicle / Terms of loan for courtesy car agreement include a $750 insurance excess and for hirer to be accountable for any panel or paint damage up to this amount / Respondent claimed Applicant damaged vehicle during hire / Respondent seeks payment of insurance excess plus collection costs / Applicant denied damaging vehicle and any liability to respondent / Held: Respondent hasn’t proven any loss under the contract / No evidence of damage / Disputed debt should not be placed in hands of debt collector / Claim allowed and counterclaim dismissed.

  4. EG v KI [2023] NZDT 247 (12 June 2023) [PDF, 109 KB]

    Tort / Trespass / Respondent trimmed trees on Applicant’s property in order to improve his view / Applicant claims work went beyond what was discussed and that Respondent damaged the trees / Applicant engaged arborist to fix damaged trees / Applicant claims $6,931.50 for arborist, removal of stumps and replacement of trees / Held: respondent could not prove he had authority to trim the trees to the extent he did / Trimming of trees beyond what was just inside boundary was trespass of Applicant's rights / Respondent to pay Applicant $1,851.50 which is sum paid to arborist / Claim partially granted.

  5. NB v U Ltd [2023] NZDT 310 (9 June 2023) [PDF, 211 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased a car from Respondent / Week after purchase car was broken in to and damaged / After break-in electric control of window no longer worked / Applicant claimed fault diagnosed as an electrical issue so not related to break-in / Applicant claimed estimated repair costs of $621 / Held: no evidence presented to indicate cause of window fault was unrelated to break-in / Claim not established on the balance of probabilities / Claim dismissed.

  6. DM v QB Ltd [2023] NZDT 124 (9 June 2023).pdf [PDF, 184 KB]

    Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant purchased and paid for installation of car stereo unit from Respondent / Car stereo subsequently stopped working / Applicant claims $995.00 in damages from Respondent / Held: Respondent failed to failure to exercise reasonable care and skill in installing car stereo / Car stereo not fit for purpose or acceptable quality / Respondent failed to remedy the fault within a reasonable time / Applicant is entitled to a refund of the full price of the unit ($565.00), the installation cost ($280.00) and value of missing hard drive ($150.00) / Applicant to pay Respondent total sum of $995.00 / Claim granted.

  7. BX & Q Ltd v QH & HB Ltd [2023] NZDT 365 (8 June 2023) [PDF, 249 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Property Law Act 2007 / Applicant leased land to Respondent on month-to-month basis / Respondent missed number of rent payments / Parties disputed when lease was terminated / Applicant claimed $6983.32 in missed rent / Held: agreement ended when Respondent made intention to cancel contract known to Applicant / This was three months after termination date claimed by Respondent / Lease ran for eight months, five days, not nine months as claimed by Applicant / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $5465.94 / Claim allowed.

  8. TB & UB v HF [2023] NZDT 307 (8 June 2023) [PDF, 113 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicants purchased a puppy from Respondent for $1,300.00 / Shortly afterwards puppy showed health issues / Puppy was diagnosed with congenital hypodipsia / Puppy’s prognosis was poor / Estimated vet bills were several thousands of dollars / Puppy was euthanised / Applicants sought compensation / Held: puppy was not of acceptable quality / Decision to euthanise puppy was understandable and humane / Applicants entitled to compensation / Respondent ordered to pay $2,000.00, purchase price and vet bills / Claim allowed.

  9. OT US v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 169 (8 June 2023) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Consumers Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) / Applicant parked his car in Respondent’s yard / Car was moved to different boarded by tall pine trees / Natural disaster occurred causing a tree to fall on the windscreen of Applicant’s car / Signs at yard stated owners of vehicles would park at their own risk of damage and theft / Applicant states Respondent is liable for its damage / Applicant claimed damages of $3,731.23 / Held: Respondent provided services with reasonable care and skill / Signs indicated that cars parked in yard were at owner’s risk / Extreme weather event caused damage of car independent of human control / Claim dismissed.

  10. SM v BQ [2023] NZDT 143 (8 June 2023) [PDF, 110 KB]

    Contract / Loan / Applicant provided Respondent with a loan / Applicant claimed Respondent had stopped communicating with them and failed to repay the loan in full / Applicant sought $16,774.94, $11,612.97 for outstanding loan plus interest and inflation / Held: outstanding amount of $11,612.97 owed by Respondent made out / Interest rate Applicant sought was exorbitant so reduced to courts prescribed interest rate totalling $422.70 / Additional costs for inflation not allowed / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $12,035.67 / Claim allowed in part.

  11. FI & IS v M Ltd [2023] NZDT 252 (7 June 2023) [PDF, 173 KB]

    Contract / Applicants booked an intercity move with Respondent / Applicants paid deposit of $527.88 and credit card fee to Respondent / Applicants cancelled move 5 weeks before intended moving date and asked for their deposit / Respondent said they would process refund / Respondent later said according to their terms and conditions the deposit was not refundable / Applicant claimed for deposit refund / Held: cancellation happened more than a month before proposed move / Cancellation was made with sufficient notice / Respondent liable to repay Applicants $513.00, invoiced amount / Applicants unable to recover $14.88 credit card processing fee / Respondent ordered to pay Applicants $513 / Claim granted.  

  12. BL v JN Ltd [2023] NZDT 162 (7 June 2023) [PDF, 231 KB]

    Contract / Fair Trading Act 1986 / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant bought caravan from Respondent, selling on behalf of third party / Third party did not want to sell caravan after Applicant asked for certain specifications prior to delivery / Applicant claimed for Respondent to supply equivalent caravan in certified and compliant state at agreed price, or compensation of $12,250 / Held: Applicant did not suffer any loss from breach by Respondent as Applicant knew of issues and decided to purchase anyway / Applicant unable to prove misrepresentation induced him to enter contract with Respondent to purchase caravan / Respondent did not fail to meet legal obligations for WOF and registration / Respondent breached Agreement when it cancelled Agreement and returned deposit to Applicant / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,600 / Claim partially allowed.

  13. LW v QT Ltd [2023] NZDT 170 (7 June 2023) [PDF, 219 KB]

    Contract / Applicant parked in private parking spot managed by Respondent / Respondent issued breach notice to Applicant’s previous address / Applicant received notice after due date and paid $245.00 to Respondent and explained notice had been sent to previous address / Respondent sought further late fee of $75.00 / Applicant refused to make further payment / Applicant claimed refund of $245.00 fee, declaration they were not liable for further $75.00 fee and $200.00 for stress and anxiety / Held: Applicant trespassed on land / Applicant entered into contract with Respondent / Contract terms set out $95.00 infringement fee / Any further fees not clearly signposted / Applicant not entitled to compensation for stress and anxiety / Respondent to refund Applicant $150.00 / Claim partially upheld.

  14. B Ltd v CT [2023] NZDT 239 (6 June 2023) [PDF, 185 KB]

    Contract law / section 31 of Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicant provided concrete foundation services to Respondent / Respondent refuses to pay the Applicant’s final invoice / Applicant claim the price of the final invoice, $3,368.70 / Respondent claim they have been overcharged and part of the amount owing was due to a delay caused by Applicant / Held: Respondent agreed to a price for some of the extra concrete / Applicant did not carry out its services with reasonable care and skill / It was foreseeable this resulted in extra cost, therefore applicant liable to reimburse respondent this cost / Claim partly allowed, Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,226.71

  15. BS & OS v PB & UQ [2023] NZDT 271 (6 June 2023) [PDF, 120 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicants and Respondents were flatmates in fixed term tenancy / Respondents moved out 3 months before fixed term expired / Applicants had to cover rent until lease ended / Applicants claimed Respondents breached flatmate agreement, / Applicants sought damages for rent and end of lease costs / Applicant also claimed stress caused failure of exam, sought additional $2750 for cost of repeating course / Held: agreement existed between parties / Respondents breached agreement by not paying rent after moving out / Applicants tried to mitigate loss by seeking replacement flatmates, but were unsuccessful / Respondents required to pay for rent and end of lease costs / Applicant’s loss from failed exam was unforeseeable and too remote from breach to be claimable / Respondents ordered to pay $3263.25 and $2087, respectively / Claim allowed in part.

  16. HN v UC & JS Ltd [2023] NZDT 166 (6 June 2023) [PDF, 103 KB]

    Contract / Applicant contracted Respondent to repaint truck for $7000 and build a well-side tray for a different truck for $4,000 / Respondent agreed to complete within three weeks /Applicant paid Respondent deposit of $6,500, $3,500 for repainting, $2,000 for tray / Applicant cancelled contract for repainting after Respondent failed to carry out work within timeframe / Applicant claimed Respondent also failed to complete tray or refund money as promised / Applicant sought refund of deposit / Respondent claimed limited liability status / Held: Respondent cannot claim limited liability as it failed to inform Applicant it was entering into a contract with limited liability company / Respondent failed to perform contract as agreed / Respondent ordered to refund Applicant total deposit, $5,500.00 / Claim granted.

  17. BC & others v QK [2023] NZDT 137 (5 June 2023) [PDF, 194 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased caravan from Respondent / Applicant alleged Respondent misrepresented caravan saying it had no leaks and mould / Applicant claimed $15,000 / Held: Respondent not in trade for selling caravans and this is a private sale / Respondent did not intend Applicant to be induced by misrepresentation nor wilfully used language to induce Applicant to purchase caravan / Claim dismissed.

  18. EM v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 171 (5 June 2023) [PDF, 124 KB]

    Consumer law / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Fair Trading Act 1986 / Applicant cancelled order with Respondent for wedding flowers and decorations / Cancellation made as Respondent could not provide flowers with similar look to showroom display as agreed / Applicant claimed refund of $1,500 deposit / Held: Applicant did not agree to use different flowers / Difference between sample agreed upon and flowers presented significant and entitled Applicant to cancel order / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,500 refund / Claim allowed.

  19. TQ v EN [2023] NZDT 113 (2 June 2023) [PDF, 192 KB]

    Contract / Applicant was a dog breeder / Applicant bred a dog and sold her to Respondent / Parties signed a contract indicating Respondent would have dog spayed by 6 months old /  Applicant alleged Respondent never had dog spayed and that the Respondent bred from her / Applicant also claimed Respondent gave the dog to a new owner / Applicant sought $3,500.00 in compensation, purchase price of dog / Held: Respondent giving dog to a new owner was not a breach of contract / Insufficient evidence to establish that dog gave birth to a litter of puppies / Likely that Respondent breached the contract by not having the dog spayed / Contract silent on any remedy for breach of contract / Applicant unable to quantify a value, or provide evidence of any financial loss that she has incurred as a result / Claim dismissed.

  20. LC v DB [2023] NZDT 161 (2 June 2023) [PDF, 104 KB]

    Contract / Applicant bought vehicle from Respondent / Vehicle broke down and Applicant advised vehicle would need engine rebuild / Respondent agreed to pay $3000 towards repairs in three instalments / Respondent only paid $1000 / Applicant claimed remaining $2000 / Held: Applicant and Respondent have an enforceable contract where Respondent agreed to pay $3000 towards costs of repairs / Respondent in breach of contract by not paying the remaining $2000 / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $2000 / Claim allowed.