You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year. Identifying details have been removed.

Some decisions in this section have had minor editorial changes applied, that have no effect on the outcome.

Search results

1756 items matching your search terms

  1. O Ltd v NT [2023] NZDT 193 (13 April 2023) [PDF, 211 KB]

    Contract / Respondent signed contract for services as independent contractor with Applicant / Respondent terminated contract leaving balance of advances on commission paid / Applicant claimed payment of weekly advances and insurance premiums incurred on Respondent's behalf / Held: Respondent liable to refund advance commissions received if he did not achieve commission payment / Respondent breached contract by failing to refund Applicant for insurance premiums paid on his behalf / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $14,109.91 / Claim allowed.

  2. NM v LK [2023] NZDT 216 (13 April 2023) [PDF, 181 KB]

    Contract / Misrepresentation / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased horse from Respondent for $13,000 / Before purchase, Applicant inquired about horse’s health / Respondent represented horse as healthy, provided veterinary certificate to this effect / Once obtained, horse discovered by Applicant to have lame gait / Applicant claimed Respondent misrepresented condition of horse, sought $9,000 compensation / Respondent admitted to altering vet certificate to remove details of lameness, but denied liability for compensation / Held: Applicant was induced to buy horse by reliance on misleading vet certificate / Applicant’s claim for compensation reasonable / Respondent ordered to pay $9,000 / Claim allowed.

  3. UN Ltd v MI [2023] NZDT 205 (13 April 2023) [PDF, 138 KB]

    Contract / Applicant provided estimate of $13,763.64 to Respondent for kitchen renovation building work / Respondent paid $20,670.43 / Applicant claimed $10,078.15 for unpaid invoice / Held: no meeting of parties' minds that Respondent’s payment had been made in full satisfaction of claim / Applicant entitled to pursue claim for further payment / Respondent liable to pay only 15% increase on original estimate as Applicant had no tangible evidence on prices / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $3,130.56 / Claim allowed in part.

  4. UH Ltd v BI [2023] NZDT 13 (12 April 2023) [PDF, 99 KB]

    Contract / Misrepresentation / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant purchased car from Respondent / Respondent asked whether car required work / Applicant said not aware that car needed work / Afterwards Respondent discovered vehicle required replacement parts / Respondent sought $915.09 for replacement parts / Held: Respondent misrepresented condition of vehicle to Applicant / Applicant  induced to purchase car by misrepresentation / Respondent provided evidence of cost of replacement parts, $915.09 / Respondent ordered to pay $915.09 / Claim granted.

  5. ND v EI and others [2023] NZDT 241 (11 April 2023) [PDF, 200 KB]

    Contract / Applicant purchased property owned by trustees of family trust / Applicant said oven and heated towel rail were not in reasonable working order at date of settlement / Applicant claimed $1,225 for breach of warranty / Held: heated towel rail was in reasonable working order at time of settlement but not the oven / Respondent not obliged to have oven inspected by registered electrician / Applicant had already negotiated reduction in price after agreement declared unconditional / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $500 / Claim allowed in part.

  6. TG v ES Ltd [2023] NZDT 11 (6 April 2023) [PDF, 99 KB]

    Contract / Applicant engaged Respondent to renovate her house / Contract was for estimated costs of $305,211.91, signed in October / By following June, Applicant had paid $305,000 / Applicant cancelled contract because of increased costs / Project was abandoned, not all work was completed / Applicant sought cost of remediation, estimated at $29,933.00 / Respondent counterclaimed $24,890.65 for building work completed before contract was cancelled / Respondent claimed increased costs was due to higher cost of building supplies / Respondent provided evidence of invoices, expenditure and variations / Held: Applicant cannot expect the certainty of a fixed price contract when only estimated costs were agreed / Respondent had completed invoiced work / Applicant liable for the invoiced amount, $24,890.65 / Respondent not liable for any remediated costs / Claim dismissed / Counterclaim granted.

  7. BB v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 10 (5 April 2023) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (CGA) / Applicant purchased CCTV cameras from Respondent via an online auction / Auction automatically sent Applicant's address which was incorrect / Applicant emailed correct address to Respondent before goods were shipped and Respondent replied / Respondent sent cameras to wrong address / Recipient refused to return cameras / Applicant sought refund of $629.95 and costs / Held: CGA provided a guarantee as to delivery / As Applicant updated his address before cameras were sent, liability for undelivered goods remained with seller / Respondent ordered to refund purchase price of $629.95 / Costs claim dismissed / Claim granted in part.

  8. EQ v ND Ltd & DQ [2023] NZDT 9 (5 April 2023) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Contract / Fair Trading Act 1986 / Applicant engaged into two contracts with Respondents / First contract worth $9,500, Respondent was to provide resource consent plans for building work / Respondent was to complete work within 20 days of receipt of a 50% deposit / Second contract, worth $5,893.75 contained same terms but for consent draughting / Applicant paid requested deposit of $8,770 but did not receive plans by due date / Applicant sought refund of deposit / Held: Respondent breached contract by not supplying plans on time / Respondent misrepresented himself by saying he was licenced and capable of carrying out agreed work when he was not / Respondents were  jointly and severally liable to pay the sum of $8,936.22, deposit and interest, to Applicant / Claim granted.

  9. UD v CE [2023] NZDT 73 (4 April 2023) [PDF, 199 KB]

    Negligence / Land Transport (Road User) Rules 2004 / Applicant and Respondent were involved in a car collision / Applicant alleged he pulled up behind Respondent when the Respondent suddenly reversed into him / Applicant and his insurer claimed damages of $10964.91 / Respondent argued he had no option but to reverse as he was threatened by the driver in front of him / Held: combination of other driver’s intimidating driving and threats to Respondent would have made an ordinary person fear for themselves and their physical safety / Respondent’s reaction to the other driver reversing towards his vehicle would have created a real concern for his safety / Respondent not liable for damage to Applicant’s vehicle / Claim dismissed.

  10. ND Ltd v TS Ltd [2023] NZDT 101 (3 April 2023). [PDF, 191 KB]

    Insurance / Applicant hired vehicle from Respondent / Collision involving Applicant and Third Respondent who was driving vehicle owned by Second Respondent / Second and Third Respondents accepted they caused collision / Insurance claim settled between insurers of Respondent and Second Respondent / Applicant claims back $2,040 bond paid to Respondent to cover insurance excess / Alternatively Applicant claims that Second Respondent should pay  / Held: Respondent not entitled to keep bond paid by Applicant / Applicant did not cause crash / Respondent has not proven they paid excess to insurer / Claim against Respondent upheld / Respondent to pay Applicant $2,040 / Claim against Second and Third Respondents dismissed.

  11. BK & BH v FF [2023] NZDT 68 (31 March 2023) [PDF, 210 KB]

    Contract / Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 / Applicants booked first class return fares through Respondent / One of the Applicants had a seat that malfunctioned for part of the return journey / Respondent compensated Applicant with 80,000 award points, $3,800 equivalent / Applicant sought $15,000 in compensation, $11,000 for seat defect and $4000 for loss of enjoyment / Alternatively, Applicant sought $3,800 instead of 80,000 award points / Held: Applicant miscalculated compensation / Correct amount for seat defect is $3,800 / Compensation for loss of enjoyment dismissed as cannot be calculated as objective figure / Respondents ordered to pay Applicants $3,800 for seat defect / Claim granted in part.

  12. CN v OQ [2023] NZDT 129 (28 March 2023) [PDF, 215 KB]

    Negligence / Applicant's property shared boundary with road reserve owned and managed by Respondent / Applicant says trees that fell causing damage to Applicant's property were from Respondent's road reserve / Applicant claimed $1,900 for damages and cost of removing fallen trees and debris / Held: Respondent under duty of care to take reasonable steps to prevent or minimise risk of trees falling during strong winds / Respondent breached duty / Respondent ordered to pay Applicant $1,518 / Claim partially allowed.

  13. KB v OS [2022] NZDT 287 (28 March 2023) [PDF, 213 KB]

    Motor vehicle collision / Contract / Vicarious liability / Applicant involved in collision with Respondent / Applicant states that he was driving down road and was involved in verbal altercation with a pedestrian / Applicant states that pedestrian was the Respondent / Applicant states that Respondent got into his van and followed him and later passed his car and made a u-turn and drove towards Applicant’s car / Applicant states that Respondent’s van drove into the right hand side of his car causing damage / Applicant saw Respondent’s employers name and contacted employer / Respondent claims that he was crossing a pedestrian and saw Applicant’s car driving very towards them / Respondent said that he told Applicant to slow down / Respondent later saw Applicant’s car and pulled up beside it intending to speak to Applicant about his driving  / Respondent states he did not hit Applicant’s car / Applicant claimed damages for his car from Respondent’s employer / Held: Tribunal was unable to d…

  14. BH v MW Ltd [2023] NZDT 35 (28 March 2023) [PDF, 198 KB]

    Contract / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 / Applicant and his partner booked Respondent’s venue for their wedding / Contracted price was $5,850 / Applicant paid $600 deposit / Respondent advised Applicant month before wedding date that the venue was no longer available / Applicant and partner had to find an alternative venue at short notice/ Applicant claimed compensation of $3,751.00 from Respondent, cost of alternative venue / Held: Respondent repudiated contract / Respondent breach contractual term to provide premises / Applicant entitled to cancel contract and go elsewhere / Applicant entitled to compensation because of cost, time and inconvenience of changing venues / Applicant’s claim not allowed in full as it would be unjust for him to pay nothing for wedding venue and associated costs / Applicant entitled to 50 percent of costs claim / Respondent ordered to pay $1,875.00 to Applicant/ Claim granted in part.

  15. UC v Council [2023] NZDT 67 (27 March 2023) [PDF, 131 KB]

    Negligence / Applicant’s garage door damaged after a vehicle lost control turning a corner / Applicant claimed Respondent was liable for repairs due to garden ‘build out’ which obstructed visibility of the corner/ Respondent claimed purpose of ‘build-out’ was to deliberately reduce visibility, so that drivers slow down / Held: Respondent not liable for damage / Negligence was not due to any breach of a duty of care owed by Respondent / Rather, it was through the careless driving of the person operating the motor vehicle / Claim dismissed.

  16. UE & QO v CO Ltd [2023] NZDT 159 (23 March 2023) [PDF, 116 KB]

    Contract / Applicant took out $1.1 million loan with Respondent secured over property / Property damaged by landslip and sold / Loan became unsecured / Parties entered contract for repayment with no interest to be reviewed every 3 months / All payments made on time but Respondent credited some payments to wrong account and referred loan to credit agency / Further contract entered that balance be paid off by lump sum with remainder due to be written off / Applicant claimed Respondent’s actions breached contractual and other obligations / Applicant claimed $43,717.00 compensation for loss / Held: Respondent did not significantly breach any obligations to Applicant / Respondent could have provided better service but admitted highlighted errors / Repayment terms could be described as lenient rather than aggressive / Claim dismissed.