CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 752 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QL purchased two laminated Gortex motorcycle jackets from E Ltd on 2 February 2022, one for himself and one for a friend. 2. On 4 July 2023, QL was out on a 3 day ride and noticed that a small patch on the front of one of the wrist cuffs had d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 619 APPLICANT LX RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by LX against O Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. LX owns land on which high voltage power lines run across part of it. LX now brings a claim against O Ltd for $30,000.00. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) Did O Ltd breach the agreement? (b) If not, was O Ltd n...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 639 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT CU APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. BU and CU were involved in an accident in the carpark at the [shop] in [City] on 25 January 2023. 2. Both drivers were attempting to exit the car park. 3. BU was parked in an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 649 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TN owns a [vehicle]. 2. In 2022 the vehicle suffered an engine failure. K Ltd re-built the engine for TN. The job cost $14,012.97 and was completed in October 2022. 3. TN had re-located to [country] for work. He asked his frie...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 67 APPLICANT UC RESPONDENT Council The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. UC lives on a corner section. On the other side of her fence is a footpath and near the corner is an area of vegetation which the Council refers to as a ‘build out’. UC said some of the vegetation is at least 1.8m high, which is to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 790 APPLICANT HG APPLICANT IU RESPONDENT AA The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HG and IU claim for payment for services rendered in preparing for and representing the AA at the Tenancy Tribunal in July 2023. AA is a landlord, and through a mutual friend, he approached IU and HG for help with defend...
...OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 231 APPLICANT QA RESPONDENT FI and II The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. QA purchased a house at [address], from FI and II with a settlement date of 7 July 2023. It rained heavily that night and he found the garage flooded, even though a pump set up to mitigate flooding was running. Just two weeks later, on 22 July 2023 it again rained heavily and the garage flooded again, along with the lawn and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 485 APPLICANT KM & OM RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay KM & OM $50.00 on or before Wednesday, 18 October 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicants seek a partial refund follo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 119 APPLICANT ZG RESPONDENT DD Limited SECOND RESPONDENT GT The Tribunal orders: 1. GT is to pay ZG a total of $12,340.00 on or before Friday 21 July 2023. 2. While the claim against DD Limited is dismissed, it undertook to pay ZG $1000.00. So, I order DD Limited to pay ZG the total sum of $1000.00 on or before Friday 21...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 274 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay BT $1,469.30 on or before 14 July 2023. Reasons 1. BT purchased a [phone] online from T Ltd. He received the phone on 5 October 2022, and within a few days it was clear that the phone could not detect the pen or stylus as it was supposed to....