[2023] NZPSPLA 011 IN THE MATTER OF Complaint against & WATCHMEN SECURITY LIMITED & BONNIE HUNT under ss 73 & 74 Of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) DECISION [1] This decision deals with a complaint that Bonnie Hunt, through his company Watchmen Security Limited, knowingly employed a security worker who did not have the appropriate certificate of approval. Subsequently, Watchmen Security’s licence expired,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 650 APPLICANT HG RESPONDENT N Ltd Order of the Tribunal 1. N Ltd is to pay $14,428.50 to HG by 20 December 2023. 2. The amount ordered includes the deduction of $2,080.00 the applicant owes for N Ltd delivery charges and $300.00 for storage of a TV and Chair. Reasons 1. The issues to be determined in this case are:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 720 APPLICANT XK RESPONDENT Q Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT KT The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay $690 to XK by 5 January 2024. Reasons: 1. XK booked [Band 1], a 2 piece band, on 3 March 2023 for her daughter’s wedding in February 2024 and soon after paid a $690 deposit. 2. In October 2023 XK’s daughter discovered [Band 1]...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 734 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT NI The Tribunal orders: NI is to pay EC $800 by 29 December 2023. Reasons: 1. NI contracted EC to prepare his property then sow a lawn using a hydroseed method with tall fescue seed. This work was carried out May 2023 and an invoice was sent for payment of $3429.12 on 13 May 2023. 2. NI paid $1610, w...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 262 APPLICANT CD RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On the 14th of November 2023, CD was issued with a breach notice for parking at the [shopping centre]. The breach notice stated that she had “parked without permission in authorised vehicle only car park.” 2. CD appealed the breach notice with QF, a division of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 348 APPLICANT XD RESPONDENT KA The Tribunal orders: KA is to pay XD $1,500.00 on or before 21 July 2023. Reasons: 1. XD bought a fish from someone advertising on [online website]. He now wishes to return the fish and obtain a refund. 2. The first hearing of this claim was set down to be heard by teleconference...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 580 APPLICANT ER & GR & MR RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. T Ltd is to pay ER, GR and MR (R family) the sum of $969.74 each by 1 December 2023. Reasons 2. The R family is seeking compensation from T Ltd because it wrongfully cancelled their return flights from [Country 1] to [City 1] in January 2023....
Information for licensees on temporary changes to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 for extended hours during the Rugby World Cup 2023 Overview Temporary amendments to the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 (the Act) for the men’s Rugby World Cup 2023 allow eligible on-licence and club-licence holders to extend their trading hours to televise live games from the tournament in France without the need to apply for special licences. The amendments can be found in sec...
...section of XD Inc, along with other members who did the same. 2. XD Inc did not hold any record of who stored their cue/s in the snooker/billiards room, and around December 2021 DQ took over the operation of this area. Sometime in the first half of 2023 DQ removed the parlour cases and the cues within them and stored them in their office. On 11 July 2023 KN went to use his cue and discovered it had been removed. His cue is not among the ones stored in the DQ office. KN claims $780.00...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 710 APPLICANT DQ RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In December 2022 DQ purchased an eight-week old purebred [puppy] from IC for $5,000.00. DQ and IC agreed on terms which are contained in the TC Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”), a copy of which IC provided in evidence. 2. The puppy is...