CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 174 APPLICANT LZ RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by LZ against I Ltd is proved. I Ltd is to pay LZ the sum of $5,100.00 by 5:00 pm on 05 June 2023. 2. I Ltd does not owe I Ltd for the value of the promotional gift cards up to $1000.00. Reasons 1. In July 2022, LZ purchased a [redacted] fishing d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 300 APPLICANT ND RESPONDENT KS The Tribunal orders: KS has acknowledged that ND is the rightful owner of the two kittens known by them as [kittens]. Reasons: 1. ND and KS live in neighbouring units at a property at [Address]. Late last year, a litter of five kittens was discovered at the property. The parties agree...
LAKE MCKAY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v QLDC – TOPIC 37 SETTLEMENT ZONES IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 143 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN LAKE MCKAY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (ENV-2021-CHC-36) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 726 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. In May 2022 EN had a solar system installed at his house by T Ltd. Some of the components were supplied by T Ltd. In May 2023, the solar inverter broke and needed replacing. T Ltd was in liquidation. A new part was provided and installe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 701 APPLICANT ED APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. ED and KD and NQ own adjoining properties at [Town]. Currently there is an area of approximately 25 metres on the boundary that is unfenced. ED and KD approached NQ with fencing proposals. As they did not get a definitive respon...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 721 APPLICANT E Ltd RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. O Ltd is to pay E Ltd $30,000 on or before 5.00pm 28 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In 2020, E Ltd purchased timber from O Ltd, who supplied H4 treated timber for decks and stairs that were being built in his property development. In June 2021, during the building of the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 427 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay BU the sum of $4,500.00 on or before 26 July 2023. Reasons: 1. BU purchased a new build property from Q Ltd in October 2022. In November 2022 she had [Company] come to connect the fibre to the property. The technician told her that there ha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 245 APPLICANT BF RESPONDENT XX The Tribunal orders: XX is to pay the sum of $636.69 to BF on or before Thursday 8 June 2023. Reasons: 1. On 17 February 2022, BF (the head tenant) entered into a flat-sharing agreement with XX (the flatmate). The flatmate paid a bond of $250.00, and two weeks’ rent in advance a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 325 APPLICANT O Ltd RESPONDENT MX SECOND RESPONDENT V Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. U Ltd is removed as a respondent at the applicant’s request. 2. O Ltd is entitled to possession of the [car] and is therefore not liable to pay $4,500.00 to V Ltd purs...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 240 APPLICANT TS APPLICANT AS RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: U Ltd is to pay TS and AS the sum of $139.89 on or before Wednesday 14 June 2023. Background 1. In November 2021, TS and AS purchased three tickets for a [band] concert to be held on [redacted] at a cost of $129.90 per ticket, as well as an additional sum of $29.97...