CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 483 APPLICANT E LTD RESPONDENT DM SECOND RESPONDENT KA APPLICANT'S INSURER U Ltd The Tribunal orders: DM and KA, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $26,263.45 to E Ltd on or before 7 July 2023. Reasons: 1. DM had been an employee of E Ltd, and in 2020 returned to work for E L...
[2023] NZPSPLA 0088 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against JOHN WOOD and application by CUSTOM AUTO SERVICES LIMITED for a company licence DECISION Background [1] In August 2023 I found that John Wood contravened ss 23, 66 and 67 of the Act by running a property guarding business (car clamping) without a licence, failing to wear his ID badge in a visible place, failing to...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 110 APPLICANT NS RESPONDENT OA Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. NS is to collect the vacuum cleaner from OA Limited within 2 weeks at her expense, unless the parties negotiate a different arrangement between themselves. Reasons: 1. On 29 June 2018, NS purchased a [vacuum cleaner] (the vacuum) and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 269 APPLICANT BS RESPONDENT MQ The Tribunal orders: MQ is to pay BS the sum of $120.00 on or before 15 June 2023. Reasons: 1. BS booked two tickets on a fishing charter run by MQ. The information that came with the tickets included a departure time of 9am. In fact, this trip (and all trips MQ runs) departed at 7am....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 78 APPLICANT SG RESPONDENT UT The Tribunal orders: UT is ordered to pay SG the sum of $1,476.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 17 March 2023. Reasons: 1) There was no appearance of the respondent, and the hearing proceeded in his absence. The applicant, and the respondent, are the owners of adjoining propertie...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 693 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT KC SECOND RESPONDENT ZX The Tribunal orders: 1. ZX is joined as a respondent. 2. The claim against KC is struck out. 3. ZX is to pay OT $330.00 on or before 2 January 2024. Reasons Introduction 1. In September 2023, OT won a [camera] from [an online] auction being run by user identification [userna...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 602 APPLICANT TE SECOND RESPONDENT M Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. TE is to pay M Ltd (M Ltd), $649.37, on all by 30 November 2023. Reasons 2. TE contracted with M Ltd for the supply of aluminium joinery for the conversion of a barn to a lecture building with a storage area. 3. Six versions of a quotation were provided, with var...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 263 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT TI Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant’s name is changed to FH. 2. TI Ltd is to pay the sum of $2,975.00 to FH on or before Monday 19 June 2023. Reasons: 1. In June 2022, the [netball team] manager for FH, UN, booked accommodation for the team and coaches from 28 August to 2...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 246 APPLICANT AX and KX RESPONDENT WB The Tribunal orders: 1. WB is to pay to AX and KX the sum of $637.23 on or before 12 May 2023. Reasons 1. AX and KX undertook fence repairs on their boundary with WB. They filed a claim seeking to be compensated for the cost of the repairs, and collection costs. The cla...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 330 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT X Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In April 2012, X Limited manufactured a set of double-glazed cedar french doors for DT. The doors were installed in her house to replace some existing doors. In May 2023, moisture appeared in the double-glazed pa...