CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 310 APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NB purchased a car from U Ltd on 24 January 2023. A week after purchase, the car was broken into and the left front window smashed for entry. 2. After the break-in, the electric control for the left-front window would not...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 292 APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay OX $334.99 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. OX purchased a pair of [headphones] from [retail store] on 19 October 2019 for $334.99. 2. In late 2022-early 2023, OX noticed that the right earbud kept dyin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 473 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT AB APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd The Tribunal orders: AB is to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to X Ltd on or before Friday 6 October 2023. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2022, there was a collision between D Ltd’s [vehicle 1], driven by its director BM, and a [vehicle 2]. Both vehicles were usi...
...ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 87 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT KB SECOND RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: A. X Ltd is added as Second Respondent. B. The claims are dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2023, SI engaged X Ltd to clean her house before the settlement day for her sale of the house. KB is the director of the company. SI alleged that some of the cleaning work had not been completed and requested a refund of $90.00, which was not...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 699 APPLICANT NW RESPONDENT LO APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NW and LO were in a relationship. In 2020, they rented a storage unit to store their belongings. The unit was in LO’s name and she paid the rental. 2. In late 2021, LO went overseas....
...payment. Compensation Guidelines Cabinet (the Government's central decision-making body of Ministers) has established Compensation Guidelines to aid its consideration of applications for such compensation. The latest version of the Guidelines was issued in 2023. Compensation Guidelines for wrongful conviction and detention February 2023 Explanatory Information - Compensation for Wrongful Conviction and Detention February 2023 The Guidelines also apply if you've been convicted and detained under...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 694 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT UI The Tribunal orders: UI is to pay directly to MD the sum of $4,800 on or before 31 January 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The parties agree the essential facts. The applicant loaned the respondent $4,800 in early 2...
80 Te Waipounamu MB 101 Manning v Waitutu Incorporation - Waitutu Incorporation (2023) 80 Te Waipounamu MB 101 (80 TWP 101) WĀHANGA Under Section 280, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Waitutu Incorporation I WAENGA I A Between RICHARD MANNING Te Kaitono Tuatahi First Applicant DIANE HOLLOWAY Te Kaitono Tuarua Second Applicant ME And WAITUTU INCORPORATION Te Kaiurupare Tuatahi First Respon...
...Geoff Anderson Johann Schlebusch ## 11-May Thu William Spring Kristina Savea Andrew Simpson Joanne Price Geoff Anderson Gul Qaisrani ## 12-May Fri Peter Syddall Waitakere Arrest ## 13-May Sat Johann Schlebusch Waitakere Arrest ## Week 4 April-May 2023 North Shore Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 NOTES ######## 15-May Mon William Spring Peter Syddall Geoff Anderson Judith Malcolm Vernon Tamatea ######## 16-May Tue William Spring Jan Leaming Laurence Herbke Gul Qaisrani Tony Beach ######## 17-M...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 188 APPLICANT QT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. QT is not liable to pay $65.00 or any other amount to T Ltd in relation to parking breach notice reference [number]. 2. The claim for costs is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 23 February 2023 a car registered to QT was parked in the car park at the [supermarket] f...