CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 266 APPLICANT SU RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: SU is to pay the sum of $80.00 to F Ltd on or before Wednesday 14 June 2023. Reasons: 1. SU seeks a declaration that he is not liable to pay $250 demanded for exceeding the time limit on 18 July 2022 in a private car park managed by F Ltd. The initial charge was...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 319 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: Application dismissed Reasons On 19 October 2022, BT visited the respondent’s electronic ticketing website and booked a flight to [Country 1] transiting via [City 1] in the [Country 2]. He paid...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 768 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT HM The Tribunal orders: HM is to pay the sum of $512.91 to C Ltd on or before Monday 15 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In August 2022, HM inquired about purchasing [Trees] from C Ltd. On 22 August, C Ltd provided HM with quotations for purchase and delivery costs of different sizes of the trees. and said...
...January 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [redacted]. 3. The claim against R Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. ST, the sole director of P Ltd, purchased a [vehicle] from D Ltd in [City] on 27 February 2023. This vehicle is a Petrol Hybrid vehicle. ST alleges the [vehicle] had problems with the battery and the headlights almost immediately after purchase. D Ltd replaced the [vehicle]’s battery with a second hand battery and subsequently the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 193 APPLICANT O Ltd RESPONDENT NT The Tribunal orders: NT is to pay $14,109.91 to O Ltd on or before Monday 1 May 2023. Reasons: 1. NT signed a contract for services as an independent contractor with O Ltd on 2 March 2022. Appendix 2 of the agreement outlined the calculation of commission payable to the real estat...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 323 APPLICANT ZZ RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: The application is dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2022 ZZ engaged W Ltd to construct a new concrete driveway at his property. L Ltd was the supplier of the concrete under a contract with W Ltd. Soon after completion of the work, ZZ notic...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 402 APPLICANT BN APPLICANT HH RESPONDENT HT SECOND BB RESPONDENT The Tribunal orders: The claim by BN and HH against HT and BB is partially proved. HT and BB are jointly and severally liable and are to pay BN and HH a total of $500.00 on or by 5:0...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 406 APPLICANT TC APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. D Ltd is to pay TC and UD $768.70, on or by 14 October 2023. Reasons 2. On 16 and 17 March 2022, D Ltd installed a ducted heatpump in TC and UD’s home. The heatpump has a drain system to remove water which builds up through condensa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 703 APPLICANT CQ RESPONDENT LM The Tribunal orders: LM is to pay CQ the sum of $421.43 by no later than 19 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In April 2023, CQ rented a sleepout from LM following cyclone damage to his [Suburb] home. The sleepout had one open room with bathroom, laundry and kitchen facilities in the main house. Kitchen and lau...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 205 APPLICANT UN Ltd RESPONDENT MI The Tribunal orders: MI is to pay $3130.56 to UN Ltd on or before 11 May 2023. Reasons 1. UN Ltd (‘UN’) provided an estimate to MI for the building work associated with a kitchen renovation at her house. MI had engaged a kitchen designer separately who had been contracted to design, supply and install the kitchen. 2....