CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 115 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT CN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. ET purchased a caravan from CN for $72,000 after seeing it advertised on [Online]. The caravan was advertised as being “set up for freedom camping or permanent living”. 2. ET uplifted the caravan on 5 May 2022. On 13 May, E...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 166 APPLICANT HN RESPONDENT UC RESPONDENT JS Ltd The Tribunal orders: UC and JS Ltd are to pay $5,500.00 to HN on or before Wednesday 21 June 2023. Reasons: 1. HN collects classic [cars]. He was restoring a [classic truck] and took it to UC for a quote to have it repainted. UC operates a business restoring vehicles....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 176 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT K Ltd The Tribunal orders: K Ltd is to pay BL $11,765.42 on or before 23 June 2023. Reasons 1. BL entered in a contract with K Ltd to provide services as a [redacted] Consultant on 2 March 2022. 2. A dispute arose regarding the commission for the ‘N’ client. BL was advised that no...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 169 APPLICANT OT APPLICANT US RESPONDENT N Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) R Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by OT and US against N Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. OT drove a [vehicle] into the parking area which is part of N Ltd’s business. OT and US now brin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 104 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. L Ltd is to pay X Ltd $1,380.00 on or before 30 March 2023. Reasons: 1. X Ltd purchased a second-hand tractor from L Ltd for $28,000.00. The tractor was advertised as having 1,216 engine hours. 2. When X Ltd received the tractor, it was disappointed wi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 195 APPLICANT And Respondent for Counterclaim MI RESPONDENT And Respondent for Counterclaim EG RESPONDENT INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal directs: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. MI is to pay Q Ltd $6,444.92 on or before Monday 10 July 2023. Reasons: 1. At around 8am on 22 September 2022, MI was indic...
HAVEN FALLS FUNERAL HOME LIMITED v KIM TEPANIA [2024] NZEmpC 47 [19 March 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 47 EMPC 408/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for stay of execution BETWEEN HAVEN FALLS FUNERAL HOME LIMITED Plaintiff AND KIM TEPANIA Defe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 725 APPLICANT DN and EN RESPONDENT R Ltd The Tribunal orders: R Ltd is to pay DN and EN $3,220.00 within 28 days. R Ltd did not appear at the hearing. Reasons [1] DN and EN booked return flights from [City] to [Country 1] with R Ltd. They claim that R Ltd unjustifiably refused to allow them on the flight that was to leave [City], and...
[2023] NZSSAA 1 Reference No. SSAA 62/22 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 2018 and the Social Security Act 2018 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of Whangaparaoa against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY G Pearson (Chairperson) R Palu (Deputy Chair) Date of hearing: 14 February 2022 Appearances: The appellant in person J Neumegen, counsel, and N Jaura, appeals officer, for...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 13 APPLICANT UH Ltd RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: BI is to pay directly to UH Ltd the sum of $915.09 on or before Tuesday, 13 December 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The parties agree the essential facts. The a...