CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 775 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. QU purchased a horse, [The horse], from LG in December 2021. The parties agree that LG represented that [The horse] was suitable for show jumping. QU believes that this was a misrepresentation and claims: a. A refund of the $12,000.00...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 782 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: 1. KC is to pay D Ltd $14,045.22 on or before 20 December 2023. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. D Ltd sold and supplied various products to KC on a charge up basis. 2. D Ltd claim $14,703.04 for unpaid invoices and the interest on those invoic...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 457 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. In July of 2022, EX first spoke to QU about building a new lawn and garden at his home. In September of 2022, QU provided a quote accepted by EX, and the work...
FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND v MDC – pMEP – TOPIC 13 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 234 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2020-CHC-58) Appellant AND MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 567 APPLICANT ET RESPONDENT EF Ltd The Tribunal orders: This claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The parties contracted for the supply of engineering design services for ET’s project in [Location]. 2. An estimate of costs for a standard project was provided and a deposit of $1,552.50 was paid to EF Ltd in December 2022. An initial...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 565 APPLICANT DS Ltd RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: I Ltd is to pay the sum of $14,000.97 to DS Ltd on or before 19 December 2023. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2022, I Ltd (trading as [redacted]) asked DS Ltd for help in finding an assistant accountant. DS Ltd referred NI to I Ltd as a candid...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 564 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT UB APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) C Ltd The Tribunal orders: UB is to pay $1040.56 to Q Ltd on or before 19 December 2023; and C Ltd is struck out as a party to the claim as the losses claimed by Q Ltd are not insurable losses. Reasons 1. Q Ltd was booked by UB as the venue for her...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 610 APPLICANT KL RESPONDENT BD The Tribunal orders: BD is to pay KL $600 on or before the 11th day of December 2023. The money may be paid into [bank account number] Reasons: Introduction: 1. KL engaged BD as her wedding photographer. 2. BD photographed the wedding and on the 20th of December sent KL 461 high resolution...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 492 APPLICANT JN APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT CI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) W Ltd The Tribunal orders: CI is to pay W Ltd $20,726.62 by Wednesday 1 November 2023. Reasons: 1. JN, TN and BC from W Ltd attended the hearing by teleconference, as did CI and his mother, ML, as his support pe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 505 APPLICANT KL RESPONDENT DQ SECOND RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: DQ and N Ltd, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $31,207.92 to KL on or before 31 May 2023. Reasons: 1. In July 2021, KL (the consumer) contacted DQ (the consultant) regarding a proposed subdivision of his property in [su...