Search Results

Search results for 2023.

5415 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. BT v CH [2023] NZDT 30 (16 January 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 30 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: BT’s claim against CH is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The parties lived together for a period of time. The applicant claims the respondent agreed to make payments to him or contribute towards living expenses each week in lieu of rent and other costs. The applicant claims...

  2. WS v KF [2023] NZDT 37 (13 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 193 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 37 APPLICANT WS RESPONDENT KF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In November 2022, WS purchased a car from KF on [the Internet]. When WS took delivery of the car, he discovered there were dents and scratches on it and a taillight that needed to be replaced. He fixed some of these items and the...

  3. TN v PO Ltd [2023] NZDT 570 (16 November 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 570 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT PO Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TN responded to a [online marketplace] listing for a Ps5 at a promo price of $450.00. The seller referred to themselves as PO Ltd. During a series of online interactions, and for a variety of reasons given by the seller, TN en...

  4. TE & TT v ST [2023] NZDT 54 (26 January 2023).pdf [pdf, 204 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 54 APPLICANT TE APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT ST The Tribunal orders: The claim by TE and TT against ST is struck out for want of jurisdiction. Reasons 1. The parents of TE and TT (the applicants) died “intestate”. The applicants now bring a claim against ST who is their sibling (the respondent) for funeral costs...

  5. N Ltd v TT [2023] NZDT 224 (16 May 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 224 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT TT The Tribunal orders: N Ltd’s claim against TT is struck out. Reasons: 1. At the hearing the respondent said he had no notice of the hearing. The respondent also said the matter was heard before the Tribunal in June 2021 under [file number redacted] and that the matter was dismis...

  6. M Ltd v CQ [2023] NZDT 571 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 90 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 571 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT CQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. M Ltd was engaged by CQ to provide digging services in preparation for siting of a tiny home. An initial price of $7668.18 was too high for CQ’s budget so the scope of work was adjusted and M Ltd provided a new price of $2730.05 which was ac...

  7. SL v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 444 (11 September 2023) [pdf, 171 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 444 APPLICANT SL RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, SL started [treatment 1] and then [treatment 2] treatment by T Ltd for fat reduction around her abdomen. She was unhappy with the results and found [treatment 2] painful. 2. SL now seeks a refund of the $4...

  8. UJ v TV [2023] NZDT 429 (31 August 2023) [pdf, 179 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 429 APPLICANT UJ RESPONDENT TV The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons: 1. UJ purchased a used car from TV. The car was advertised on [the Internet], and UJ messaged TV about it. They arranged a time to view the car, and UJ’s wife went, and test drove the car. UJ then purchased the car. Shortly afterw...

  9. OIA-113260.pdf [pdf, 937 KB]

    ...collation and research. In response to your third question, please refer to tables 2 and 3 below. Table 2 provides the number of cases for children removed from New Zealand or retained in another Contracting State under the Hague Convention, from 2011 to 2023. Table 3 provides the number of cases for children brought to or retained in New Zealand and are decided by the Family Court in New Zealand under the Hague Convention, from 2010 to 2023. It is important to note that both Outgoing or...

  10. [2025] NZLVT 33 – REP Family Trust v Tauranga City Council (22 July 2025) [pdf, 166 KB]

    ...Chairperson of the Waikato 4 Land Valuation Tribunal in the absence of Judge D A Kirkpatrick in accordance with s 19(10) of the Land Valuation Proceedings Act 1948. 2 B: The valuation of the property at 49 Girven Road, Mount Maunganui as at 1 May 2023 is as follows: (a) Capital Value: $1,475,000; (b) Land Value: $1,210,000; (c) Value of Improvements: $265,000 C: The valuation of the property at 15 Sovereign Road, Mount Maunganui as at 1 May 2023 is as follows: (a) Ca...