CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 158 APPLICANT BU RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 2. BU purchased a [car] from B Ltd for $5,250.00. He understood the car was registered as a seven seater car. BU has a large family and was in the market to buy a car that could fit his family. After he purchased the car, he d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 196 APPLICANT SK RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SK parked on private land while attending a concert in the city, and his vehicle was towed by T Ltd. He paid $350.00 to retrieve his vehicle and claims a refund of that amount plus associated costs, based on his understanding from...
~- ~ ~ \I I N I S fR Y 0 1 ~Jj~ J UST IC E ~ /,1/m o :r /14rr Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 9 18 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz I www.juslice.govt.nz 13 April 2023 Section (9)(2)(a) Section (9)(2)(a) Our ref: OIA 102415 Tena koe - Official Information Act request: Hate Speech Proposals Thank you for your request of 9 February 2023 under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) in which you sought information about the co...
THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA 13 July 2023 MEDIA RELEASE PILGRIM & ORS v ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ORS (EMPC 85/2022) [2023] NZEmpC 105 PRESS SUMMARY This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at htt...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 738 APPLICANT EL RESPONDENT MN APPLICANT'S INSURER K Ltd The Tribunal orders: MN is to pay $8,615.04 to K Ltd on or before 5.00pm on 18 January 2024 Reasons 1. EL had driven through the traffic lights from [Road A] onto [Road B], [City] heading towards [suburb]. The two lanes on his side of the road...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 264 APPLICANT OU RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In August 2023, OU bought two tickets through [ticket company] for “[concert]” in [city] on [date], for $356.30 (which included afterpay fees). However, [city council] advertised a special price of $99.00 for the tickets, in a rates notice o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 6 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT SL The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The Breed Certificate transfer should be issued to SL for [Horse] as if he had been paid for in full. Reasons 1. In October 2022, SL purchased a colt named [Horse] for $6,000.00 from BD. The sum of $500.00 was to be paid after delivery...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 560 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT BD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BT Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim against BD Ltd is withdrawn. The claim against BT Ltd is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by telephone. All parties appeared at the hearing. [2] LD and his insurer, BJ Ltd confirm they wish to withdraw t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 486 APPLICANT WC RESPONDENT HM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. When WC moved in with her partner at [address] in February 2022, she formed a bond with a young white and ginger tabby tom cat who regularly visited her. She called him P and said the window was left open for him to come a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 463 APPLICANT LQ and QQ RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,275.07 to LQ and QQ immediately. Reasons: 1. This amended order is made under the “slip rule”1. It changes the amount of the original order, and the calculation of that sum in the last paragraph of the original order...