CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 501 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT B The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. EN had his bag stolen while in a shop in the departure lounge at [International airport]. On his return to New Zealand, he made a travel insurance claim and that was declined. 2. EN claims $1,102.20 for the property s...
Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 42 Tax Invoice Civil Legal Aid Fixed Fees Victims' Orders against Violent Offenders (Applicant & Respondent) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from...
17 July 2023 Tena ko Tffiffi/ Justice Centre I 19 Ait ken St reet DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@j ustice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 105436 Official Information Act request: Historic homosexual convictions Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) on 20 June 2023 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry). I will respond to each part of your request in turn. In the first part of your request,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 226 APPLICANT SI RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SI has income protection insurance with B Ltd. In April 2021 he injured his right foot during his job as a plumber. He visited a podiatrist over a number of months and carried on working as best he could. 2. The inju...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 211 APPLICANT K Ltd RESPONDENT SG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] T Ltd contracted in 2016 to provide telephone services to a company, U Ltd, of which SG was a director. The company was removed some three years later from the Companies Register, and T Ltd continued to provide services for some t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 75 APPLICANT J Ltd RESPONDENT KG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant claims debts under a credit contract assigned to it on 21 September 2021 by I Ltd. In its application the applica...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 86 APPLICANT ST RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Vehicles driven by ST and SC on a race-track at the [Race] in [Town] in November 2022 were involved in a collision. 2. ST alleges that SC was driving negligently and claims $5,230.00 from him made up as follows: a. Cost o...
...appeal] Introduction [1] This is a claim for costs and disbursements in relation to an appeal in which the Corporation was successful. Background [2] The substantive matter in this appeal was the decision of a Reviewer dated 1 December 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s email dated 2 August 2023, on the basis that this was not a reviewable decision under the Act. 2 [3] On 28 February 2024, the Court delivered its judgment,1 w...
...extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority).1 Leave is required because the challenge was not filed within the statutory time period for doing so.2 1 Taifau v Spring 2017 Ltd [2023] NZERA 396 (Member Larmer). 2 Employment Relations Act 2000, s 179(2). [2] The respondent opposes the application for leave to extend time. Both parties have filed affidavits and submissions, and agreed that the application co...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 717 APPLICANT LN RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The applicant’s name has been corrected from [redacted] to [redacted]. 2. The respondent has been renamed to reflect the contracting company – B Ltd. 3. The claim is dismissed. Reason Is the respondent required to provide a refund? 1. LN has made a claim tha...