Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 32a Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Care of Children/Guardianship Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final i...
Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 32b Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Care of Children/Guardianship Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final i...
Version 21 – October 2023 page 1 10/23 form 33a Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Family Violence (Applicant & Respondent) Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final...
Contents NZCVS Data Tables 2023 (Cycle 6) Perceptions of safety Data tables Sheets Description 1 Changes in perceptions of safety 1 Perceptions of safety over time 2 Perception of safety and vicitmisation 2 Prevalence and incidence rates, by perception of safety 3 Perception of safety, by demographic groups 3 Perceptions of safety, by demographics About About the data tables Disclaimer 1. While all care and diligence has been taken in processing, analysing, and extracting...
103 Tākitimu MB 129 Gemmell v Phillips - Mohaka A4B (2023) 103 Tākitimu MB 129 (103 TKT 129) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District A20220010242 A20220012308 A20220012315 WĀHANGA Under Section 19, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Mohaka A4B I WAENGA I A Between ARTHUR GEMMELL, CLAUDE GEMMELL, SAMUEL GEMMELL AND CAROL WHATUIRA...
...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Code of ACC Claimants’ Rights - s 40; Appeals process - s 149(3); Decision – s 6(1), Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 15 June 2023. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review on the basis of lack of jurisdiction, finding that the Corporation’s letter of 18 November 2022 was not a reviewable decision under the Act. Background [2] From December 20...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 213 ACR 110/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN PAUL BROWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 15 December 2023 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua-Nui-a-Kahumatamomoe Appearances: K Koloni for the Appellant F Becroft for the Accident Compensation...
...the existing old wood and netting fence, extending to the edge of the boundary (including the area that was previously unfenced). The new fence and retaining wall enclosed a new garden bed on their property. This work was completed in early April 2023. 8. The Trust’s property is unoccupied and so it did not notice the work initially. However, at Easter 2023 the Trust became aware of the work, and immediately contacted PT and OT and told them that the wood and wire netting fence was...
Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 476 FIRST APPLICANT NT SECOND APPLICANT OX RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,822.67 to NT and OX on or before Tuesday, 23 May 2023. The balance of the claim is dismissed. REASONS 1. On 8 October 2022, the Applicants, NT and OX (together referred to as “the Applicants”), booked to fly with...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 7 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 335 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim by X Ltd is dismissed. X Ltd is to pay U Ltd $8,418.54 on or before 5pm on Wednesday 22 March 2023. Reasons: 1. In March 2021, X Ltd (“X Ltd”) and U Ltd (“U Ltd”) entered into discussions regarding the provision of services by...