Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 459 APPLICANT BM and OT RESPONDENT OE and DE The Tribunal orders: OE and DE are to pay $30,000.00 to BM and OT by 1/8/23. Reasons: 1. This order should be read with that dated 17/3/23. Misrepresentation? 2. The applicants rely on the applicable clauses in the sale and purchase agreement as to misrepresentation. It is importa...
...Corporation abated the leave payments Mr Samuela had received from his employer to cover the period 28 September 2021 to 26 October 2021. Mr Samuela applied to review this decision. On 17 November 2022 the review was dismissed. [10] On 14 March 2023 the Corporation revoked the decision under appeal and replaced it with a new decision which no longer abated Mr Samuela’s leave payments. The backdated weekly compensation was recalculated and agreed to be paid by the Corporation. [1...
...229 [27 November 2024] ORDER PROHIBITING PERMANENT PUBLICATION OF NAMES AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 229 EMPC 155/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF applications for non-publication BETWEEN BDX Plaintiff AND PZY Defendant Hear...
...appeals in the above matters were lodged by Ms Herbst as follows: (a) ACAR 13/25: The appeal is from the decision of a Reviewer dated 26 November 2024. The Reviewer dismissed an application for review of the Corporation’s email of 14 December 2023 declining reimbursement of Ms Herbst’s physiotherapy surcharges. The appeal was lodged on 6 January 2025. 2 (b) ACAR 14/25: The appeal is from the decision of a Reviewer dated 21 November 2024. The Reviewer dismissed an app...
...APPLICANT NH RESPONDENT NC SECOND RESPONDENT HC The Tribunal orders: NC and KC are ordered to pay NH the sum of $3,000.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 13 December 2024. Reasons: 1) On 4 July 2023 the applicant bought a dog named ‘[the dog]’ from the respondent-breeders. The price paid was $3,000.00. 2) Soon after [the dog]’s purchase, she had ‘respiratory and overheating episodes.’ There were attendances at the applican...
...advertisement had stated that the car was in working order, and that JE had said the same thing when she had her husband had inspected the car. She had detected no problems with it when they test drove it. [4] OD purchased the car on 1 September 2023. She did not know what the odometer reading had been at the date of the purchase but, she said, it was recorded by D Ltd as being 184,052 kms as at 28 February 2023. By early November, it had done approximately 5,000 kms more. [5] OD dro...
...2014 agreement was preceded by a 2010 separation agreement in which DU agreed to pay a lump sum of $372,500.00 from the property division towards future child support payments. 4. DU has provided a spreadsheet covering assessments for the period May 2023 to July 2024. Although BT has reimbursed some of the payments during that period, she has not reimbursed them all. Law 5. In the previous proceedings, BT challenged the Tribunal’s jurisdiction to hear the claim. The Tribunal fo...
...this proceeding. 6. Accordingly the applicant progressed the claim against KQ, submitting that he was personally liable as a consequence of: a) directors liability; and b) misleading and deceptive conduct in trade. Background 7. In 2023, the applicant contracted C Ltd to build (including instructing relevant sub- contractors) a minor rear dwelling (“the contract”). CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 8. It was a full turnkey build, from start to finish for a fixed...
...The client is BQ, a national of Vietnam. [6] The adviser is Thanh Tam Thomas Tran, previously a licensed immigration adviser and director of Visas and Jobs Ltd, of Auckland. He surrendered his licence on 8 May 2024. [7] From about 12 February 2023, Mr Tran acted for the client. He communicated with the client’s mother and an unlicensed agent (OI). Mr Tran entered into a service contract with the agent on 23 May. It is understood by the Tribunal that Mr Tran “met” with th...
339 Waiariki MB 182 Moke – Succession to Te Poroa Joseph (Joe) Malcolm (2025) 339 Waiariki MB 182 (339 WAR 182) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000030042 WĀHANGA Under Sections 113, 117, 214 and 219, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Succession and Constitute a Whānau Trust – Te Poroa Joseph (Joe) Malcolm NĀ By EVA...