[2025] NZREADT 24 - CT v REA (14 July 2025) [pdf, 276 KB]
...loss. Furthermore, the family was unable to recover $25,000, allegedly paid in error to the licensee’s brother. [10] Given the issues with the roof, the licensee did not relist the property, although there was some interest from a party in early 2023, but early negotiations fell apart, due in part to the prospective purchaser’s concerns about the need to replace the roof. [11] On 31 July 2024, the applicant made a complaint about the licensee to the Authority under s 74(1) of t...