Search Results

1. UI & II v SG [2024] NZDT 224 (6 March 2024) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SG owns [property 1] and [property 2]. The long ROW driveway leading to his properties runs parallel to the ROW driveway for [property 3], which was owned by II and UI until July 2023, when they sold it. 2. The driveways are separated by a small grass strip for most of their length, there being no other boundary marker or fence dividing them. 3. On the morning of 26 June 2021, SG directed a contractor’s truck, th...

2. Meroiti v Meroiti - Owhata No 1J No 2B (2024) 315 Waiariki MB 183 (315 WAR 183) [pdf, 299 KB]

   ...and their possessions, chattels and materials from the area upon which Julena Meroiti was granted an occupation order by the Court, being an area of 0.1606m2 as shown on the plan attached to the Court Order at 299 Waiariki MB 154-160 dated 6 July 2023. (b) Are prohibited from entering upon the area that Julena Meroiti was granted an occupation order by the Court, being an area of 0.1606m2 as shown on the plan attached to the Court Order at 299 Waiariki MB 154-160 dated 6 July 2023...

3. MQ v X Ltd & N Ltd [2024] NZDT 72 (19 February 2024) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...a targa-style removable hard top roof. The roof is attached to the vehicle with hex (Allen key) bolts. 2. MQ had the vehicle at [Mechanic] in [City] for engine work. It was at [Mechanic] for approximately three and a half years. 3. In July 2023 the vehicle needed to be transported to X Ltd for bodywork. 4. X Ltd contracted N Ltd, a heavy transport / towage operator, to transport the vehicle. 5. On 28 July 2023, N Ltd (Mr A) collected the vehicle. With the assistance of [Mecha...

4. Fenning v Accident Compensation Corporation (Lump sum compensation) [2025] NZACC 55 (1 April 2025) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...some dizziness, and felt that his thinking lacked its usual clarity. It is difficult to determine now whether his symptoms at the time were due to the highly traumatic nature of the event or concussion or a combination of both. [7] On 20 July 2023, Mr Fenning underwent a neurological review with Dr Peter Wright, Neurologist, who reported: Colin has symptoms without signs of any significance of headaches, cognitive and balance difficulties. In addition, he has very minor migraine e...

5. J Ltd v PE Ltd [2024] NZDT 357 (9 March 2024) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...orders: PE Ltd is not liable to pay J Ltd the sum of $6,790.75 for the amount of J Ltd’s final invoice for flooring work. Reasons: 1. PE Ltd owns a property in [location], it is occupied by its director and shareholders, KN and NT. In early 2023 KN contacted J Ltd regarding polyurethaning the floors. J Ltd advised using a water based rather than a moisture cured product and provided a quote. PE Ltd accepted the quote and paid a fifty percent deposit of $6,790.75. In March 2023...

6. [2024] NZEmpC 171 Lanigan v Fonterra Brands (New Zealand) Ltd (Interlocutory (No 3) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...PLAINTIFFS LISTED IN APPENDIX A v FONTERRA BRANDS (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 171 [9 September 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 171 EMPC 181/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to appoint a Court expert AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to participate at a...

7. NS v TN & C Ltd [2024] NZDT 544 (4 July 2024) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...The Tribunal orders: A. The claim by NS against C Ltd is dismissed. B. TN is to pay NS $1,465.40 by 12 August 2024. C. The claim by TN against NS is dismissed. Reasons 1. NS booked a bach run by TN. TN accepted the booking on 1 August 2023 (when the booking was paid for) and then cancelled it on 30 November 2023. The booking was to be from 30 December to 1 January. NS and his family had to find alternative accommodation but not in [Town] but a long way inland at [alternati...

8. Iseri v Pocock - Allotment 246D1 Waimana Parish (2024) 328 Waiariki MB 64 (328 WAR 64) [pdf, 223 KB]

   328 Waiariki MB 64 Iseri v Pocock - Allotment 246D1 Waimana Parish Block (2024) 328 Waiariki MB 64 (328 WAR 64) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TE WAIARIKI In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Waiariki District AP-20230000033270 WĀHANGA Under Section 135, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Allotment 246D1 Waimana Parish Block NĀ BY OZGUIR DENIZ ISERI Te kaitono Applicant ME And KAR...

9. Hipango v Ngaurukehu - Ngaurukehu A10 Section 3(2024) 484 Aotea MB 88 (484 AOT 88) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...Ngaurukehu Section 3 and other blocks incorporated- Ngaurukehu A10 Section 3 and other blocks (2024) 484 Aotea MB 88 (484 AOT 88) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-20230000022764 WĀHANGA Under Section 164, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Ngaurukehu A10 Section 3 and other blocks I WAENGA I A Between TUKAPUA BENJAMIN ANTHONY HIPANGO Kait...

10. 2025 NZPSPLA 074.pdf [pdf, 106 KB]

    ...for working without the required licence or certificate. 2 [6] There is no information to suggest that either Mr or Mrs Shaw worked in security from February 2018 until both Mr and Mrs Shaw were granting new COAs in 2021. [7] In 2023 Mr and Mrs Shaw established Home and Farm Security Service. They set up a Facebook page for their new business, acquired security uniforms, and professionally painted a motor vehicle with the name of the security business and orange and blue...