Search Results

1. G Eckhoff - SoE - 21 April 2021.pdf [pdf, 396 KB]

   ...buy in from water users Plan change 7 is to provide an interim regulatory framework for the assessment of applications to renew deemed permits in 2021 to allow for the expectation the Regional land and water plan is expected to be operative in 2023 unquote from the ORC summery of PC7.That simply wont happen - Your Honour - there is no existing ORC land plan. It is therefore a nonsense to expect an land and water plan - to be operative in 2023 -2 years time • the whole argument of PC...

2. UV Ltd v MB Ltd [2023] NZDT 81 (11 November 2022) [pdf, 221 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 81 APPLICANT UV Ltd RESPONDENT MB Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. MB Ltd is to pay to UV Ltd the sum of $5,209.82 on or before 2 December 2022. 2. UV Ltd is not liable to pay MB Ltd the sum of $1,115.84. 3. MB Ltd is to arrange to collect the garments from UV Ltd at MB Ltd’s cost. UV Ltd is to make the garments available for c...

3. 05.-Evidence-of-Mr-Lindsay-Poutama-Ngati-Tukorehe.PDF [PDF, 221 KB]

   ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF LINDSAY JAMES POUTAMA ON BEHALF OF NGĀTI TUKOREHE IN S...

4. 09.10.-Kim-Tahiwi-and-Rawiri-Rikihana-Nga-hapu-o-Otaki-draft-evidence-3.07.23-BF-tracked-changes.PDF [PDF, 255 KB]

   ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for resource consent and notices of requirement under sections 87G and 198E of the Act for the Ōtaki to North of Levin Project By Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF KIM HOLLY MICHELE TAHIWI AND RAWIRI RIKIHANA REPRESENT...

5. [2024] NZEmpC 152 YQO v MYN [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...shortly after they commenced their employment they became aware of conduct that they considered amounted to serious wrongdoing by the company. YQO also claims that they informed a company director about this on three separate occasions. On 12 July 2023 YQO was asked to attend a meeting the next day. On 13 July they were advised in writing that their employment was to end pursuant to the trial period clause in their employment agreement. [8] On 21 July 2023 YQO’s counsel wrote t...

6. NG & OG v JS [2024] NZDT 33 (18 January 2024) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...APPLICANT NG SECOND APPLICANT OG RESPONDENT JS The Tribunal orders: The claim by NG and OG against JS is dismissed. REASONS 1. The Respondent, JS, advertised for sale through [online] a [Caravan]. 2. On 6 August 2023, the Applicants, NG and OG, viewed the Caravan and purchased it from JS for a purchase price $45,500.00. 3. NG and OG intended to live in the Caravan. Soon after purchase, they found that the Caravan was leaking. They paid [Caravan...

7. Zhang v Apple Sales New Zealand (Strike Out) [2025] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...of the product by reason of a dictionary definition of “provide”. It was the purchase of the iPad that made the software available to him or supplied it to him. 9 Zhang v Samsung Electronics New Zealand Limited (Strike Out Application) [2023] NZHRRT 42, (2023) 14 HRNZ 230. 6 [21.2] Apple Sales is the warranty obligor for both the purpose of Apple Sales’ own warranty contract and the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993. Based on this, the definition of “manufacturer” in...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 219 Oliver v Biggs [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...proceeding, Mr Oliver requested that the Court exercise its powers under s 140(6) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) to sequester Mr Biggs’s property, fine him, or impose a term of imprisonment for up to three months. 2 Oliver v Biggs [2023] NZEmpC 28. 3 Oliver v Biggs [2021] NZEmpC 104, at n 5. [9] There was, however, a jurisdictional issue because no order of compliance had been made against Mr Biggs to that point. As recounted in my first judgment, this...

9. DN v TT & CB [2024] NZDT 880 (28 August 2024) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...Reasons 1. DN saw a [Car] (registration [redacted]) advertised for sale on [an online sales platform]. She and her husband arranged with CB, who answered the telephone number in the advertisement, to view the car at [an address] on 26 November 2023. TT’s car yard, R Ltd1 is located at this address. CB was looking after the car yard while TT was overseas. 2. DN purchased the car on 26 November for $8,300.00 in cash and drove the car home to [Town A]. Around 2 weeks later the car...

10. BI v X Ltd [2025] NZDT 44 (4 February 2025) [pdf, 212 KB]

    ...Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2025] NZDT 44 APPLICANT BI RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: X Ltd is to pay to BI the sum of $2,903.75 on or before 25 February 2025. Reasons: 1. In November 2023, BI purchased a roof top tent from X Limited (“X Ltd”) online. The rooftop tent cost $2,450.00 and the shipping cost $149.00. The roof top tent was delivered to BI in December 2023. 2. BI used the rooftop tent between 10 and 15 time...