Search Results

1. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...TE WHAREHURU GILBERT, MARTHA HINEONE GLIBERT, KAREN MARAMA PARATA, MABEL URU TANIRAU AND ROGAN RAWIRI HAHOPE TANIRAU Ngā Kaitono Applicants Nohoanga: Hearings 6 August 2021, 441 Aotea MB 117-146 (Heard at Wellington) 31 January 2023, 461 Aotea MB 49 Kanohi kitea: Appearances Whakataunga: Judgment date C Hockly for Applicants T Cooley for First Respondents B Cash for Second Respondents 5 May 2023 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ D H STONE Judgm...

2. [2024] NZEnvC 037 Hensman v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 461 KB]

   ...I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 37 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an application for an enforcement order under ss 314 and 316 of the Act BETWEEN G H, L M AND P J HENSMAN (ENV-2023-CHC-013) Applicants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner C J Wilkinson Environment Commissioner S Myers Hearing: at Queenstown on 5 December 2023 Appeara...

3. MacNaughtan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury/Causation) [2023] NZACC 160 [pdf, 327 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 160 ACR 277/18 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN JOHN MACNAUGHTAN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 25 August 2023 Heard at: Wellington Appearances: Mr R Mansfield KC for the Appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar and Ms F Becroft for the Respondent Judgment: 3 Octo...

4. FVPP02A Assessment outcome: terms settled [docx, 275 KB]

   ...details: [bookmark: Text56]      The client attended a: [bookmark: Check3]|_| Long assessment [bookmark: Check4]|_| Medium assessment [bookmark: Check5]|_| Short assessment [image: crest_BW]Form FVPP02A v5.0 July 2023 FVPP02A Page 1 of 4 FVPP02A page 4 of 4 Terms of Attendance Settled The programme has the primary objective of stopping or preventing my use of family violence and will give me the skills and knowledge that I can use to meet this goal....

5. 20230328-Regulatory-Systems-Education-Amendment-Bill.pdf [pdf, 207 KB]

   LEGAL ADVICE LPA 01 01 24 10 March 2023 Hon David Parker, Attorney-General Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Regulatory Systems (Education) Amendment Bill 1. We have considered whether the Regulatory Systems (Education) Amendment Bill (the Bill) is consistent with the rights and freedoms affirmed in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the Bill of Rights Act). 2. We have not yet received a final version of the Bill. This advice has been prepared in...

6. 4_Draft-Conditions-Amendment-1-Proposed-condition-REM10-and-Schedule-7-v2.pdf [pdf, 325 KB]

   From: Greg Lee <Greg.Lee2@nzta.govt.nz> Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2023 12:03 PM To: Jasmine Mitchell <Jasmine.Mitchell@horizons.govt.nz> Subject: O2NL Project - Change to proposed condition REM10 and Schedule 7 Kia ora Jasmine, 1 Following discussions with the Department of Conservation, Waka Kotahi writes to advise that we agree to update proposed condition REMlO and Schedule 7, as follows (changes shown in red text: underline new text and strike through removed text...

7. BU v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 18 (30 January 2024) [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...NZDT 18 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim BU RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against B Ltd Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Refused The Order of 14 September 2023 stands. Reasons for decision: 1. I held a teleconference hearing today to establish if a rehearing of this matter (originally heard by Referee Jadurum) should be ordered. FB appeared for B Ltd, and BU responded. As explained...

8. [2024] NZEmpC 149 Osborne v Callaghan Innovation [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...application to strike out several of Mr Osborne’s causes of action.5 If that is the case, no reason was given for putting aside that success. Other parts of this submission, which touched on the timeliness of 5 Osborne v Callaghan Innovation [2023] NZEmpC 209. steps taken by Callaghan Innovation, lacked specificity and cannot be taken any further. [14] Finally in relation to the second submission, while a party’s conduct may be taken into account under reg 68, it...

9. TC v UMA [2024] NZDT 260 (5 March 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...were sold. 3. The network did expand, but charging technology changed (to a ‘combined charging system’ – CCS) and the newer super-chargers installed by UMA around the country were not compatible with TC’s 2018 [vehicle]. 4. In December 2023 TC enquired about a CCS retrofit via UMA’s app chat, and was given a price. He asked why there would be a charge given he had free super-charging from purchase. UMA responded that the CCS upgrade was not covered by free super-charging...

10. QN v UN [2024] NZDT 197 (8 April 2024) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 197 APPLICANT QN RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 15 November 2023, QN went to UN to buy 2 half wine barrels that were on special. QN enlisted the help of a young male staff member of slight build to assist him in selecting, carrying the barrels to QN’s vehicle and loading them into the back. It was agre...