YJL v TALENT PROPELLER LIMITED [2024] NZEmpC 193 [3 October 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 193 EMPC 368/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to adjourn the hearing BETWEEN YJL Plaintiff AND TALENT PROPELLER LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 3 October 2024 (Heard at...
...Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 375 APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT CD APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: CD is to pay J Ltd the sum of $5,143.95 within 21 days. Reasons 1. On 21 August 2023 at about 8am (being a very busy time), the applicant was driving his motor vehicle along the T2 lane of [road 1]. 2. At that time, the respondent was in her motor vehicle approaching the intersection of [road 2] and [road 1], an intersec...
...dwellings at [Address] to avoid a compliance requirement to pay a Development Contribution of $8910.20 to [City] District Council. 2. Sometime after a compliance certificate was issued for the particular dwelling, TQ reinstated the sink and in 2023 the property was sold by R Ltd (TQ being its sole director) to SX with its nominee N Ltd. 3. N Ltd claims $30,000 from both R Ltd as the vendor and TQ in his personal capacity on the basis that TQ’s conduct was misleading and deceptiv...
...DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 473 APPLICANT CQ Ltd RESPONDENT CE APPLICANT'S INSURER B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. CE is to pay B Ltd the sum of $11,984.02 by 30 June 2024. Reasons 2. On 2 February 2023 NB was in his van on the median strip on [Road]. He was planning to turn right. CE turned right out of the exit of [address] onto [Road]. He moved onto the median strip to turn right and the two cars collided. 3. The issues for...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 488 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT D Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In September 2023, TT purchased a tenanted two-bedroom apartment with a carpark in [suburb] from TC for $29,000.00 at an auction held by D Ltd. TT was informed by the tenants during the pre-settlement inspection that there was a leak in the sink and shower. S...
...from [dealership] in [City 1]. After travelling 8,000kms and within the three year warranty period, he discovered the water pump was leaking. He took the vehicle to BN, the [dealer] in [City 2], who could not find any coolant leak. In December 2023, after traveling a further almost 40,000km, the coolant pump and thermostat had to be replaced for the cost of $2,439.04. OT said the failure of the coolant pump was a known fault and claimed to be reimbursed for that cost. 2. The issu...
...made under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 HEARD remotely on 12 December 2024 APPEARANCES L Urlich & M Greentree for CIPU P Tulloch the certificate holder DECISION [1] In November 2023 I referred complaints made against Peter Scott Tulloch to the Complaints, Investigation and Prosecution Unit (CIPU) for investigation and report. CIPU concluded there was an insufficient factual or legal basis for the original complaints to...
...and final settlement, and I find that on the evidence before me today, there is no evidence that the dispute is a real dispute. 8. I note in particular the deck deduction cited by the Respondent in its email to the Applicant dated 11 September 2023. No deck had been built, nor had it been agreed for it to be built, as part of the work covered by the unpaid invoice. The deduction therefore does not appear to be genuine. This applies in different ways to all the other items listed,...
...engaged C Ltd (the company) to carry out siteworks and construct a cabin at his property in [City]. The client paid the invoiced deposit of $15,187.50 the next day, and later made other payments, including an instalment of $38,904.00 on 24 January 2023. However, the work stalled and was never completed. The company went into liquidation on 24 October 2024. 2. The client now claims $30,000.00 from CI (the director of the company). The director did not attend the hearing or present any def...
KATHLEEN CRONIN-LAMPE v THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MELVILLE HIGH SCHOOL [2023] NZEmpC 144 [30 August 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 144 ARC 55/2013 ARC 79/2013 ARC 48/2014 ARC 25/2014 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF proceed...