Search Results

1. Logan - Omahu 2H1B and Others (2024) 109 Tākitimu MB 199-206 (109 TKT 199-206) [pdf, 234 KB]

   109 Tākitimu MB 199 Logan - Omahu 2H1B and Others (2024) 109 Tākitimu MB 199-206 (109 TKT 199) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O TĀKITIMU In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Tākitimu District AP-20230000035662 WĀHANGA Under Section 231, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Omahu 2H1B and Others NA By MATTHEW PETER LOGAN Te kaitono Applicant Nohoanga: Hearing 30 January 2024, 107...

2. NZBORA-advice-AP-Education-and-Training-Amendment-Bill-final-for-publication-v2.pdf [pdf, 271 KB]

   ...adjustments | Beehive.govt.nz 3 Amendment Paper 2024 (49) Education and Training Amendment Bill (66-1) at Education and Training Amendment Bill 66-1 (2024), Government Bill – New Zealand Legislation 4 Standing Orders of the House of Representatives 2023, SO 269(2A). https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/students%E2%80%99-needs-centre-new-charter-school-adjustments https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2024/0066/latest/versions.aspx https://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/governm...

3. TH v BC [2024] NZDT 141 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) W Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TH against BC is proved. BC is to pay W Ltd the sum of $3,467.36 on or before 5:00 pm on 09 May 2024. Reasons 1. On 17 August 2023 BC reversed his car colliding with the front of TH’s car causing damage. TH through his insurer W Ltd now brings a claim against BC for $3,467.36. 2. The issues to be resolved are: (a) What is the legal framework? (b) Did BC reverse

4. KB v OS [2022] NZDT 287 (28 March 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 287 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT OS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LP RESPONDENT INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On the late evening of 14 July 2021 KB was driving his car on [Street name] in [Suburb] when he was involved in a collision with a van dr

5. L Ltd v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 86 (22 February 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...merchant card services to L Ltd, which allows L Ltd’s customers to pay for goods with credit cards and so forth. L Ltd runs a “click and collect” online purchase service for customers, who can pay online by entering their card details. In about May 2023, a person using the service fraudulently paid for the groceries they had ordered with a credit card that did not belong to them, and picked the groceries up from L Ltd’s store. The customer whose card was used notified their bank wh...

6. SX v J Ltd [2024] NZDT 788 (16 September 2024) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...1. J Ltd is to pay SX $10406.99 on or before 10 October 2024. 2. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to account number [redacted]. Reasons: 1. SX owns a [model redacted] ute. He was involved in an accident in his ute on 7 April 2023 when he went to sleep and ran into a ditch and landed sideways and the ute was damaged. His insurer, J Ltd covered the cost of the repairs but for his excess. SX alleges when he uplifted his ute after the repairs, he immediately noticed ther...

7. SN v UQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 349 (29 April 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...a refund of invoice 4368 issued by UQ Ltd is dismissed. B. There is a Declaration under section 10(1)(b) of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 that SN is not required to pay invoices 4369 and 4448 issued by UQ Ltd. Reasons 1. In about July 2023, SN sought advice from UQ Ltd about the trouble she was having with the transmission in her car. DT of UQ Ltd was unable to assist at that time beyond a brief inspection because he was about to go on holiday. SN then sought advice from tran...

8. NI & SL Ltd v AI [2024] NZDT 334 (18 April 2024) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...1. AI is to pay SL Ltd $5000.00 on or before Thursday 9 May 2024. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. AI (the seller) advertised her dairy for sale with an asking price of $80,000.00. After some negotiation on 22 September 2023, the Director of SL Ltd NI and the seller signed an agreement for sale and purchase of a business for $35,000.00, and a $5000.00 deposit was paid. Then on 29 September NI notified AI that the purchase was not proceeding in reliance on the du...

9. TD v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 761 (31 October 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...with previous similar claims involving unauthorised parking under the law of tort (trespass) and has rejected the notion that a contract is created. The issue was comprehensively discussed in the cases of USM v Q Ltd [2022] NZDT 291 and KM v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 324. Q Ltd’s warning sign not to park does not constitute an offer, as nothing of value is being offered. On the contrary, the intended purpose of the sign is to act as a disincentive to unauthorised parking. The breach fee...

10. LF v JN & Ors [2024] NZDT 354 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

    ...which were owned by the Trust. Both JN and LF say [the artwork] were in storage unit 15. JN says the unit also held his personal items, and items owned by M Ltd, D Ltd, as well as other items that he was storing for other people. 7. In 2022 and 2023 the OA in its capacity as the administrator of JN’s estate in bankruptcy, and as liquidator of M Ltd and D Ltd organised for an auctioneer to sort through the items in the storage unit, sell those it considered of value for sale by aucti...