8017 items matching your search terms
..................................................................................................................... 23 Schedules A – J — July 2018 2 Schedules A, B & C: Police Prosecutions 1 P olice Prosecutions Administration/Case Review A B C Tasks covered by fixed fee Preliminary work – - new legal aid grant - when additional charges are added to the legal aid grant * $155 For: • taking instruct...
...(clause 17). [6] The agreement set out in detail the plaintiff’s duties and responsibilities which, inter alia, required him to plan, organise and control the operation of the hotel, manage the hotel’s business plan or direction, hire and train new staff, supervise the day to day running of the hotel, and to report directly to the managing director. The agreement provided that the defendant might alter those duties to meet changing demands of the business environment “but n...
REVIEW AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND 2012 NZRA 000010 Applicant AJ Respondent Secretary for Justice Date of Decision: 4 August 2012 ________________________________________________________________ DECISION ________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION 1. In a decision dated 22 May 2012, the Secretary for Justice (‘the Secretary’) declined approval of the applicant as a lead provider for Category 2 Criminal Proceed...
...the reasons for its appeal. Attachments 4 12. In Wairakei Pastoral & Ors1 the Environment Court waived the appellant’s requirements to provide the following documents: a. Hard copies of the appeal; b. A list of names and addresses of persons to be served with a copy of this notice; c. A copy of Forest and Bird’s original submission; d. A copy of Forest and Birds further submission; and e. A copy of the Waikato Regional Council’s decision on PC1. D...
...the attributes of her natural and artificial feet she requires a different size shoe on each foot. Unless custom made, to have one functional pair of shoes it is necessary to purchase two pairs. Non- matching sized shoes are no longer available in New Zealand. Accordingly, there is no dispute that for Ms XXXX to obtain a pair of shoes in New Zealand which she can use, she needs to purchase two pairs. [2] Proper footwear is critical for Ms XXXX’s mobility. In the mid-1990s, the or...
For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/lat Legal Aid Tribunal Page a For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/lat LAT 05/11 - 1 Application for Review (Legal Services Act 2011) 1 What is this form for? Use this form if you want to apply to the Legal Aid Tribunal (the Tribunal) for a review of the Legal Services Commissioner’s decision. 2 Who can apply for a review? You can apply for a review of the Legal Services Commissioner’s decision if you...
SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 171 [30 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 171 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: Evidence of plaintiff witness given 7 Augu...
...August 2008 2 The Waitakere and Manukau Family Violence Courts: An evaluation summary Published August 2008 Ministry of Justice PO Box 180 Wellington New Zealand www.justice.govt.nz ISBN 978-0-478-29047-0 Crown Copyright The Waitakere and Manukau Family Violence Courts: An evaluation summary 3 Contents Tables
...7 issues in any event. That will have to be an issue for another case in which there is evidence on the question. Section 4 of the Minimum Wage Act 1983 [14] There are two versions of s 4 of the MW Act that affect this case and even then a new s 4 has superseded these with effect from 30 April 2013, although that latest version is of no relevance in the present instance. [15] As from 17 June 2003 (pursuant to s 3 of the Minimum Wage Amendment Act 2003), s 4 provided:...
...counsel how she discharged her professional engagement. There is a significant public interest in an allegation of that kind. [13] As it transpires, on the evidence before the Tribunal that allegation is not upheld, it is none-the-less important it is addressed. The Facts [14] The Tribunal issued a minute to the parties (8 April 2011), identifying the issues that appeared to arise on the papers before the Tribunal, and the conclusions that could potentially be reached. [15] At tha...