Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8017 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Lochiel Farms [pdf, 200 KB]

    PXK-592901-3-67-1:pxk IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE ENV-2020-AKL-000099 IN THE MATTER of Plan Change 1 to the Waikato Regional Plan pursuant to s 274 Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) BETWEEN BEEF AND LAMB NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Appellant AND WAIKATO REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF LOCHIEL FARMLANDS LIMITED WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS 28 JULY 2020...

  2. LCRO 103/2022 RP v DQ (25 September 2024) [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...& I authority forms and approving your statement of distribution between the parties. 1 Email CY to RP (2 June 2021). 3 [11] On 3 June, Ms RP sent the firm’s terms and conditions by email, with a covering letter of engagement, addressed to: The Owners [address] [12] Included here are parts of that letter:2 Dear DQ, AQ, BQ, WK RE: SALE OF [ADDRESS] Thank you for choosing [Law firm A] to act on your behalf in relation to the sale of [address]. The receipt by us...

  3. Family Court rewrite submission: Backbone Collective [pdf, 295 KB]

    ...Women commonly tell us they wish they had never gone to the Family Court for protection, they wish they had stayed with the abuser as it was safer, they can’t wait until their child turns 16 because only then will they be safe, that no social service agency, nobody in Government or any of the commissions can help them once they are in the Family Court. Something is seriously wrong! Issues with this Review We believe that the Government has a duty of care to women and children who...

  4. ENV-2016-AKL-000186 Viaduct Harbour Holdings Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 8.6 MB]

    ...Strategic Transport Corridor zone H22 Strategic Transport Corridor Zone E1.5 High Land Transport Noise overlay objectives and policies J1.5 High Land Transport Noise overlay Recommended for deletion G2.7.9 Integrated transport assessment New Policy E27.3(2) Under the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010, section 144 (8) (c) requires the Panel to set out: the reasons for accepting or rejecting submissions and, for this purpose, may address the sub...

  5. Interim regulatory impact statement - jury trial timeliness [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...once submissions on the options have been received and further policy work completed. Population implications Initiatives that are aimed at improving timeliness in District Court jury trials will contribute to improving access to justice for all New Zealanders. Further analysis will be undertaken to determine how the options addressed in this RIS will impact on different population groups. Māori and Pasifika are disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system as bot...

  6. Te Ao Mārama — Enhancing Justice for All

    ...opportunities for victims and their whānau to speak during the court process. Te Ao Mārama partners with iwi and communities to design and deliver whānau wrap-around service solutions to meet each community’s diverse needs. It builds from existing services in the community, rather than duplicating them. Te Ao Mārama requires no changes to the law and does not compromise the independent mana of the judiciary, justice sector agencies or iwi and the community. It is not a new court; it...

  7. Reid v Fire Services and Crown Law (Recall Application) [2012] NZHRRT 27 [pdf, 95 KB]

    1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2012] NZHRRT 27 Reference No. HRRT 058/2007 IN THE MATTER OF A CLAIM UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN JAMES ROBERT REID PLAINTIFF AND NEW ZEALAND FIRE SERVICE COMMISSION FIRST DEFENDANT AND CROWN LAW OFFICE SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Hon KL Shirley, Member Dr SJ Hickey, Member REPRESENTATION: JR Reid in person PA McBride for First Defenda...

  8. LCRO 323/2013 AZ v BY (22 June 2017) [pdf, 220 KB]

    ...repeated here to provide readers of this decision with the background information:1 7. Mr and Mrs AZ were married for 35 years and separated in 2008. The principal asset for the purposes of relationship property division was a residential property at [address]. The registered proprietors of that property at all material times were [Mr AZ senior, Mrs AZ and CX], a solicitor. Those three parties held the property as Trustees of the [ABC] Trust created by deed on 18 August 1995. The pri...

  9. Auckland Standards Committee v Clews [2014] NZLCDT 19 [pdf, 91 KB]

    ...Crown Law (acting for the respondent to Mr E’s appeal) a draft affidavit and “questions and answers” document, both of which contained privileged material. 5 This is conduct that occurred at a time the practitioner was providing regulated services and is conduct that would reasonably be regarded by lawyers of good standing as disgraceful or dishonourable. 6 Alternatively, it was negligent or incompetent, and the negligence or incompetence has been of such a degree as to reflect o...

  10. Director of Human Rights Proceedings [Lightbody] v Corrections (Joinder of Second Defendant) [2018] NZHRRT 32 [pdf, 234 KB]

    ...Reference No. HRRT 036/2017 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROCEEDINGS (in respect to BENJAMIN LIGHTBODY) PLAINTIFF AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FIRST DEFENDANT AND SERCO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED PROPOSED SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey MNZM, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr R Kee, Director of Human Rights Proceedings Ms V McCa...