Search Results

1. [2024] NZEnvC 064 The Surveying Company Limited v Waikato District Council [pdf, 548 KB]

   ...the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN THE SURVEYING COMPANY LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000086) WEL NETWORKS LIMITED (ENV-2022-AKL-000081) Appellants AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge L J Newhook sitting alone under s 279 of the Act Last case event: Joint memorandum dated 18 March 2024 Date of Order: 5 April 2024 Date of Issue: 5 April 2024 _________________________________________________________________ CONSENT OR...

2. Scarborough v Kelly Services (NZ) Ltd (Application for Non-Publication Orders) [2015] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 77 KB]

   1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2015] NZHRRT 43 Reference No. HRRT 033/2015 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN YASODHARA DA SILVEIRA SCARBOROUGH PLAINTIFF AND KELLY SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED FIRST DEFENDANT AND ASSA ABLOY (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED SECOND DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND – ON THE PAPERS TRIBUNAL: Rodger Haines QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Scarborough in person Mr C Bennett for first defend...

3. BN & MN v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 64 (20 September 2013) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...effect of preventing any further immigration steps until it was resolved. [2.3] Mr Hakaoro failed to make proper inquiries, and charged them $6,000 when he could do nothing for them but led them to believe he would provide effective, professional services. He then lodged applications that were hopeless, both due to the effect of the pending complaint and because the applications did not contain cogent grounds. [2.4] Mr Hakaoro provided no services of value, and then failed to refund th...

4. OIA-119289.pdf [pdf, 20 MB]

   ...public interest and does not consider that it outweighs withholding the information at this time. Please note that this response, with your personal details removed, may be published on the Ministry website at: Official Information Act responses | New Zealand Ministry of Justice If you are not satisfied with this response, you have the right to make a complaint to the Ombudsman under section 28 of the Act. The Office of the Ombudsman may be contacted by phone on: 0800 802 602, by emai...

5. Jury service - juror declaration and claim form - Auckland High Court [pdf, 327 KB]

   JUROR DECLARATION AND WEEKLY CLAIM FORM Postal: Auckland High Court, DX-CX10222, Auckland 1140 Email: aucklandhc.juryservice@justice.govt.nz Phone: (09) 916 9690 Claim forms can be posted or emailed. First day of Jury Service: ____________________________ [RETURNING JURORS ONLY - Week Beginning: ____________________________] I ____________________________________________________________of (Print first name and surname) ____________________________________________________...

6. Wang v Fu [2016] NZIACDT 38 (8 August 2016) [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...a work visa. The application failed. [1.2] Mr Fu agreed to apply for a reconsideration of the decision to decline the application. [1.3] He failed to apply in time, and withdrew an application for visitor visas dishonestly; telling Immigration New Zealand that he had instructions to do so. [1.4] He dishonestly told the Authority when responding to the complaint that he had lodged the request for reconsideration in time, and had instructions to withdraw the visitor visa applications. T...

7. Family legal aid response to consultation [pdf, 565 KB]

   ...that chooses to rely upon the information. Published by the Ministry of Justice 2013 © Crown Copyright ISBN xxx-x-xxx-xxxxx-x (print) ISBN xxx-x-xxx-xxxxx-x (online) Ministry of Justice Justice Centre, 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088, Wellington, New Zealand T +64 4 918 8800 F +64 4 918 8820 E info@justice.govt.nz W www.justice.govt.nz http://www.justice.govt.nz/ iii Contents Introduction 4 Consultation Process 5 Consultation Proposal 6 Response from submitters 7...

8. Talanoa v Tangilanu [2015] NZIACDT 40 (15 April 2015) [pdf, 84 KB]

   ...various disclosure requirements. [2.2] She also failed to document the amount of, and terms relating to her fees, and did not issue an invoice when paid. [3] Ms Tangilanu has not responded to the complaint with an explanation or justification addressing the grounds of complaint. [4] The Tribunal has concluded it must uphold the complaint, as the material before it establishes Ms Tangilanu did not comply with her obligation to document her instructions, and the fees relating to them....

9. [2010] NZEMPC 144 Gilbert v Transfield Services (NZ) Ltd [pdf, 37 KB]

   GILBERT V TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NZ) LTD CHCH 28 October 2010 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2010] NZEMPC 144 CRC 25/10 IN THE MATTER OF application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN DEREK WAYNE GILBERT Applicant AND TRANSFIELD SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LTD Respondent Hearing: By submissions filed by the plaintiff on 2 August and the defendant on 16 August 2010 Judgment: 28 October 2010 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The...

10. Brighton v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 65 (28 September 2012) [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...complaints he abused his status as a licensed immigration adviser, to provide the opportunity to use misrepresentations to induce potential clients to pay fees. [5] He dishonestly misrepresented both the opportunities potential clients had to migrate to New Zealand, and the services he would provide to assist them. The misrepresentations were tailored to what Mr Standing though might be effective in particular cases. His dishonest misrepresentations included deceit such as: [5.1] he p...