8059 items matching your search terms
...FAM No: ……………………. 2 I nterpreter required: [ select the option that applies] yes no If yes, specify language: ...…………………………………………………………. *Home address: ..……………………………………………….…………………... *Work address: ...…………………………………………………………………... *Contact telephone number(s): ………...…….....
NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS’ ASSOCIATION IUOW INCORPORATED v AIRWAYS CORPORATION OF NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 11 [10 February 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 11 EMPC 437/2021 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS’ ASSOCIATION IUOW INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND...
...Cooper answered ‘no’ to both these questions. He was duly employed and on 10 January 2014, began working for STS. [6] On 29 January 2014, Mr Cooper appeared in Court and was remanded until 14 March 2014, so that he could provide possible addresses for the Probation Service to assess for an electronically monitored sentence (home or community detention). [7] On 24 February 2014, the Public Defence Service filed an application on behalf of Mr Cooper for substitution of a communi...
...COMMITTEE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. Background [1] This is an application for review of a decision by the National Standards Committee to lay charges against FT before the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal. [2] Briefly, the facts are that FT and another lawyer have commenced a number of proceedings related to, or lodged a number of complaints against, Justice Harrison. The proc...
NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS’ ASSOCIATION IUOW INCORPORATED v TASMAN CARGO AIRLINES PTY LIMITED [2023] NZEmpC 234 [20 December 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 234 EMPC 427/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND AIR LINE PILOTS’ ASSOCIATION IUOW INCORPORATED First Plaintiff AND...
...mother from making an application for a paternity order or a maintenance order. (e) the domicile of the child is changed to that of the adoptive parents, but the child’s race and nationality are not affected. (f) the child must be treated as a New Zealand citizen by birth if at least 1 of the adoptive parents is a New Zealand citizen. Certificate by witness I certify that, before ……………………………………………….…………………….….…………...
...Advisers Authority referred this complaint to the Tribunal. The essential facts alleged in the complaint are: [1.1] The complainant sought a long-term business visa and engaged Ms Kim to assist. The complainant was proposing to migrate from Korea to New Zealand. [1.2] There were irregularities in the client engagement process. [1.3] Ms Kim had her client sign a blank application and then submitted it to Immigration New Zealand; without notifying Immigration New Zealand of the process,...
...insurance scheme, or any sort of insurance for that matter. That it is poorly run and interfered with by government does not change this basic fact. It is governed by legislation that must be adhered to. It is a contract with the people of New Zealand who are forced to be party and ACC and any deviation from the legislation and natural justice is a criminal fraud against the levy and premium payers of which I am one. I paid for cover, and now by fraud are being denied. The...
...continue with the present arrangement. 2. I have the right to appeal the Council's decision - (a) under section 156(1) of the LGATPA because the Council rejected a recommendation of the Hearings Panel in relation to a provision or matter I addressed in my submission on the proposed plan (submission #1806). The Council decided on an alternative solution, which resulted in a provision being included in the proposed plan or a matter being excluded from the Proposed Plan: (b) under s...
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 17 Reference No. HRRT 017/2013 UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1993 BETWEEN LOUISA HARERUIA WALL Plaintiff AND FAIRFAX NEW ZEALAND LIMITED First Defendant AND THE MARLBOROUGH EXPRESS Second Defendant AND THE CHRISTCHURCH PRESS Third Defendant AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Mr MJM Keefe JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Ms...