OY v QS LCRO 66 / 2011 (28 August 2012) [pdf, 80 KB]
...ongoing negotiations with Mr [QR]. [9] Mr QS responded on 31 May and repeated his position that he had not acted for Mr QR until Mr OY had left the group and denied that he was conflicted in any way. [10] On 2 June 2010 Mr OY complained to the New Zealand Law Society 3 Complaints Service. He enclosed a copy of the letter from Mr QS dated 1 September 2009 in which Mr QS reported on the proposed bank facilities. Mr OY alleged that Mr QS had a conflict of interest in continuin...