TN v LR LCRO 42/2013 (14 April 2016) [pdf, 77 KB]
...quorum. Consideration of the complaint was postponed for one month. The Committee that decided the matter was comprised of five lawyers and one lay member. The Standards Committee decision [16] The Standards Committee distilled the issues to be addressed as follows: • Was Mr LR’s conduct misleading and deceptive? • Did Mr LR mislead the Court? • Did Mr LR attack Mr TN’s reputation without good cause? [17] The Committee, after considering the parties’ submissions, det...