LCRO 106/2014 TY v DH [pdf, 177 KB]
...DH); and (c) as instructing solicitor, Mr DH had an obligation to pay Mr TY’s account, this obligation reinforced by r 10.7 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 (the Rules). [37] The first issue addressed by Mr TY at hearing, was the Committee’s decision to decline jurisdiction on grounds that Mr TY was not providing regulated services. [38] The Committee concluded that Mr DH was not providing regulated services to Mr TY and therefo...