Search Results

1. Application for waiver (for refund) or fees for an organisation [pdf, 453 KB]

   ...justice.govt.nz/contact-us/find-us or call 0800 COURTS (0800 268 787). Step 9 Submit your application Send this application to your local court. See justice.govt.nz/contact-us/find-us or if you're still unsure, call 0800 COURTS (0800 268 787). http://justice.govt.nz/services/finding-your-local-court What happens next? A registrar will look at your application and we will let you know their decision. It may take several weeks for your application to be processed. If...

2. [2023] NZIACDT 11 - SM v Kim (6 April 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...application for the complainant with Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ). It was approved on 9 April 2018. 1 SM v Kim [2023] NZIACDT 5. 3 [9] On 19 April 2018, Ms A sent Wealand International’s invoice to the employer. It was addressed to the employer and was for $21,505, comprising an overseas recruitment fee ($18,505) and a visa service fee ($3,000). The employer paid the fees the same day. [10] The complainant arrived in New Zealand on 18 May 2018 to work...

3. HE and SD v QXF [2011] NZIACDT 32 (20 September 2011) [pdf, 126 KB]

   ...exactly what happened. CD and his partner B have made every effort to help us and have now refunded some of the monies that we feel we were overcharged. It is clear by some statements made in emails to us, asking us to send documents directly to his address in Russell; that his intention was not to conduct our business in a professional manner and exclude [his employer]. [8] The CD complaint has been dismissed and the reasons are given in a separate decision. 3 Overlap betwee...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 85 Ramkissoon v Commissioner of New Zealand Police [pdf, 668 KB]

   ...or unjustified disadvantage in employment) and s 125 (the tests for an order for reinstatement in employment). This case consists of three separate grievances, each of which arose at a different time and one of which arose, arguably, after the new tests under ss 103A and 125 came into effect. It is therefore necessary to determine which of the new or old tests for justification applies to each grievance and whether the new or old s 125 reinstatement test applies to the unjustified...

5. BORA Identity Information Confirmation Bill [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...this conclusion, we have considered a potential inconsistency with the right to freedom from discrimination in s 19 of the Bill of Rights Act. Our analysis of this issue is set out below. PURPOSE OF THE BILL 3. The Bill establishes an electronic service that allows agencies to confirm identity information about individuals. The purpose of the Bill is to contribute to the prevention of crime, particularly crimes involving fraud or a false identity and to ensure that agencies can use an...

6. Ngamoki-Cameron v Koopu - The Proprietors of Mangaroa & other blocks incorporated (2014) 91 Waiariki MB 279 (91 WAR 279) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...section 151 of this Act; or (d) Dies; or (e) Otherwise vacates office in accordance with the constitution of the company. (2) A director of a company may resign office by signing a written notice of resignation and delivering it to the address for service of the company. The notice is effective when it is received at that address or at a later time specified in the notice. (3) Notwithstanding the vacation of office, a person who held office as a director remains liabl...

7. LCRO 105/2020 AG v BH & CI (19 February 2021) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...failed to pay costs ordered by the court. Her bankruptcy application was successful. Mr DJ responded with an application to have the bankruptcy set aside. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [9] Ms AG lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 24 November 2019. The substance of her complaint was that: (a) she contested the amount she had been charged for the services provided; and (a) her lawyers had “breached provisions...

8. LCRO 204/2021 UX v AK (28 April 2022) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...been responsible for taking photographs at Mr UX’s property. [10] The Police determined to take no steps in respect to the complaint lodged by Mr UX. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [11] Mr UX lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 31 January 2021. This was the second occasion that Mr UX had lodged a complaint against Mrs AK. His first complaint was filed on 29 October 2020, and a decision delivered in respect to t...

9. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Vujnovich [2021] NZLCDT 1 (5 February 2021) [pdf, 86 KB]

   NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2021] NZLCDT 1 LCDT 013/20 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant AND SONYA MARIE VUJNOVICH Practitioner CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms J Gray Mr K Raureti Prof D Scott Mr B Stanaway ON THE PAPERS DATE OF DECISION 5 February 2021 COUNSEL Mr P Collins for the Au...

10. [2023] NZEmpC 157 Whakarongorau Aotearoa New Zealand Telehealth Services LP v Public Service Association, Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi [pdf, 201 KB]

    WHAKARONGORAU AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND TELEHEALTH SERVICES LP v NEW ZEALAND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION TE PŪKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI INCORPORATED [2023] NZEmpC 157 [19 September 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 157 EMPC 330/2023 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declarations and an injunction under Part 8 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF...