Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 64 Panuku Development Auckland Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 856 KB]

   ...Auckland of an originating application under sections 281 and 291 RMA for waivers and directions PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-78 ) Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Regulatory Authority Court: Principal Environment Judge Newhook Counsel: MC Allan for Auckland Council Date of Decision: 10 May 2018 Date of Issue: 10 May 2018 DECISION ON EX PARTE NOTICE OF MOTION BY AUCKLAND COUNCIL UNDER ss 281 and 291 RMA FOR WAIVERS AND DIRECTIONS A: Waivers granted as...

2. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 AC evidence chief legal submissions [pdf, 436 KB]

   ...of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) for resource consents to establish a Marina with 160 berths and 55 car parks on a reclamation at Matiatia Bay on Waiheke Island (Application). THE COUNCIL'S ROLE 2. It may be helpful to address at the outset how the Council has approached its role in these direct referral proceedings. 3. Section 87F of the RMA was amended by the Resource Management Amendment Act 2013 (RMAA 2013) to include new subsections (6) and (7), whi...

3. Fonterra-Co-operative-Group-Limited.pdf [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...appropriate way to achieve the objectives of the Waikato Regional Plan in terms of section 32 of the RMA. Alternative dispute resolution 5. Fonterra agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. Service 6. In accordance with the directions in Environment Court decision [2020] NZEnvC 063, this notice will be lodged with the Environment Court via email to WRC.PC1appeals@justice.govt.nz, and copies will be served on the Appellant...

4. Human Rights Act 1993

   ...file – non-party – law to be applied – Human Rights Act 1993 ss 105, 107(1) and 108(1) – High Court Rules, Part 3, Subpart 2, rr 3.5 to 3.16 Adoption Action Incorporated v Attorney-General (Non-Party Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 4 IHC New Zealand v Ministry of Education (Non-Party Access to Tribunal File) [2013] NZHRRT 2 Access to Tribunal file – non-party – law to be applied – whether principle of open justice to be turned into an enforceable right to fair and accurat...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Human rights >
   3. Decisions - Index

5. Ashraf v Standing [2012] NZIACDT 55 (30 August 2012) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...complaint against both Mr Loh and another licensed immigration adviser, Ms Gu-Chang, being upheld. Both Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang were working in the same organisation and were dealing with the same instructions from Mr Chen. [3] Ms Gu-Chang and Mr Loh addressed the issue of sanctions in a joint submission. Their respective roles are discussed in the separate decisions upholding the complaint against each of them. There are important differences between them in relation to the Tribunal’s...

6. Chen v Loh [2013] NZIACDT 55 (30 August 2013) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...complaint against both Mr Loh and another licensed immigration adviser, Ms Gu-Chang, being upheld. Both Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang were working in the same organisation and were dealing with the same instructions from Mr Chen. [3] Ms Gu-Chang and Mr Loh addressed the issue of sanctions in a joint submission. Their respective roles are discussed in the separate decisions upholding the complaint against each of them. There are important differences between them in relation to the Tribunal’s...

7. LCRO 173/2018 YN v LT (7 March 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...she brought with her a substantial file containing information relating to her case. [5] Mr LT advised Ms YN that he was unable to take on her case. 2 The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [6] Ms YN lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (the Complaints Service) on 23 July 2018. The substance of her complaint was that: (a) Mr LT had, in the course of the initial interview, made inquiries as to her age. That inquiry was improper...

8. AA v AB LCRO 298/2011 (9 October 2014) [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...prepared to provide further assistance to Mr AA, but on strictly prescribed conditions. MS would fund Mr AC’s efforts to achieve a settlement with ACC, but were not prepared to support continued litigation. [12] Mr AA has lodged complaints with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service in respect to both Mr AB and Mr AC. The Standards Committee’s decisions in respect to both complaints are the subject of applications for review to this office. The Complaint and the Standa...

9. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLDec14 draft conditions of consent [pdf, 251 KB]

   ...ASL AEE folio of figures) (e) IMC – Typical Marina Walkway & Finger Section & Marina Office Plan & Elevation - Drawing No.4208-211 dated 12-12-14 (being figure 105 in December 2014 folio of figures). (f) Riley Consultants Ltd – Services Plan Drawing No. 10178-13 dated 08-12-14 (being figure 107 in December 2014 folio of figures). (g) Light Group – Matiatia Marina T6 Talley Luminaire Bollard Layout - Drawing dated 18- 02-13 (being Figure 29 in March 2013 ASL AEE folio...

10. [2006] NZEmpC AC 52/06 Simpsons Farms Ltd v Aberhart [pdf, 143 KB]

    ...determination of the Employment Relations Authority finding that Geoffrey Aberhart had been dismissed unjustifiably by Simpson Farms Limited (SFL) and awarding him compensation for non-economic loss of $15,000, include: • the application of the new s103A of the Employment Relations Act 2000 to redundancy dismissals; • whether dismissal was by reason of genuine redundancy; • whether dismissal was fair and reasonable; • if not, what remedies are available to Mr Abe...