Search Results

1. Scentre New Zealand Limited 201 [pdf, 295 KB]

   ...of the LGATPA of section 274 of the RMA of hearing Topic 043 / 044 - Transport ("Topic 043 1044") of the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan PROGRESSIVE ENTERPRISES LIMITED Appellant AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF SCENTRE (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED'S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS 6 OCTOBER 2016 RUSSELL M~VEAGH A A Arthur-Young I J A Riddell Phone +64 9 367 8000 Fax +64 9 367 8163 PO Box 8 OX CX10085 Auckland 1140 1 To: the Registrar of the Environme...

2. Waitangi-Tribunal-COVID-19-Level-2-protocol-29-October-2021.pdf [pdf, 160 KB]

   Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Delta Level 2 protocol 29 October 2021 1. This protocol will take effect when New Zealand, or any region of New Zealand, moves to Level 2 of the Covid-19 Alert System. It should be read in conjunction with the Government’s Covid-19 Alert System Level 2 restrictions, including the additional measures put in place to address the Delta variant of the Covid-19 virus. 2. Courts and Tribunals are an essential service. At Alert Level 2, and subject to the re...

3. Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Level 2 Protocol (29 October 2021) [pdf, 160 KB]

   Waitangi Tribunal COVID-19 Delta Level 2 protocol 29 October 2021 1. This protocol will take effect when New Zealand, or any region of New Zealand, moves to Level 2 of the Covid-19 Alert System. It should be read in conjunction with the Government’s Covid-19 Alert System Level 2 restrictions, including the additional measures put in place to address the Delta variant of the Covid-19 virus. 2. Courts and Tribunals are an essential service. At Alert Level 2, and subject to the re...

4. [2023] NZIACDT 13 - OT v Ramos (24 April 2023) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...and/or dishonest or misleading and/or breached the Code of Conduct 2014 (the Code), all being grounds of complaint under the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act). BACKGROUND [3] The complainant, a national of Brazil, first came to New Zealand in 2016 on a working holiday visa. He is a carpenter. [4] Ms Ramos, a licensed immigration adviser, is a director of Sunrise Immigration Services Ltd, of Auckland. [5] In 2017, the complainant contacted Ms Ramos seeking a work...

5. AF v BN LCRO 166 / 2011 (25 July 2013) [pdf, 144 KB]

   ...who in turn had recommended that they instruct Mr BO. The Christmas break then intervened so that the first attendances recorded in respect of this matter by Mr BO was on 21 January 2008. [12] After Mr BO was instructed, Calibre Financial Services made a loan offer to the purchaser (who was now to be [Company 1]) of $381,500 to be secured by a first registered mortgage. [13] A second mortgage for $75,000 was also offered by Blackbird Finance. [14] Mr AF explained at the r...

6. RV v IP and RM LCRO 212/2014 (25 July 2016) [pdf, 78 KB]

   ...there is no evidence of any adverse consequence to the IPs. Analysis The Act [37] Complaints are to be determined with reference to the purposes of the Act, which relevantly focus on maintaining public confidence in the provision of legal services, protecting consumers of legal services, and recognising the status of the legal profession. Similarly, the application of the rules is guided by the Act’s purposes. The Rules [38] Rule 8 says that: A lawyer has a duty to protect...

7. Guide-3-A-Guide-to-Deportation-Appeals-by-Residents-or-Permanent-Residents.pdf [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...New Zealand served you with a deportation liability notice. You were served with the deportation liability notice: a) when it was handed to you personally; or b) if it was sent by registered post or courier, when it was delivered to your contact address; or c) if it was sent by email, when it was delivered to the server of your internet service provider or other server used by you for the receipt of email. It is presumed to have arrived at your server the same day it was sent, unless...

8. Fitikefu v Department of Corrections (Strike-Out Application) [2019] NZHRRT 51 [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...are best prescribed by special provisions in those Acts. [38] We refer to the Explanatory Note because the admissibility of parliamentary history to assist with the process of statutory interpretation has undergone substantial liberalisation in New Zealand over the past three decades, and it is often referred to, including by the Supreme Court. See Ross Carter and Jason McHerron Statutory Interpretation Update (NZLS CLE, June 2016) at 126 and 128. [16.3] In Director of Health and Disa...

9. Mercury NZ Limited 84.pdf [pdf, 163 KB]

   ...generality of the above, the specific reasons for Mercury’s support of Fonterra’s proposed definition and use of the term “water bodies in the Waikato and Waipā River catchments” include: 7.1 It is appropriate to ensure that all tributaries addressed within the definition are subject to Objective 1. 7.2 A holistic approach to the Waikato River and all its tributaries and constituent parts is consistent with Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato. 100423514/808177...

10. Mercury NZ Limited 97.pdf [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...above, the specific reasons for Mercury’s support of the Notice of Appeal’s proposed definition and use of the term “water bodies in the Waikato and Waipā River catchments” include: 7.1 It is appropriate to ensure that all tributaries addressed within the definition are subject to Objective 1. 7.2 A holistic approach to the Waikato River and all its tributaries and constituent parts is consistent with Te Ture Whaimana o Te Awa o Waikato. 100423514/8079303 3 Medi...