LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [pdf, 396 KB]
...Mr QSR, as evidenced by Mr YCH’s “fail[ure] to ensure” the estate advanced $7,000 to her for medical purposes which she said Mr QSR, as co- executor, had refused. 5 (4) Fees invoiced to the estate [24] Ms TSR claimed Mr YCH’s legal services were “far below the professional standard expected in a fiduciary role”, but until he provided her with information about his fees invoiced to the estate, she could not make a complaint about them. Response [25] In his response...