Search Results

1. [2022] NZEnvC 037 Bagnall v Tasman District Council [pdf, 20 MB]

   BAGNALL v TDC – CONSENT ORDER IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2022] NZEnvC 37 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under section 120 of the Act BETWEEN JAMES and PHILLIPA BAGNALL (ENV-2021-CHC-83) Appellants AND TASMAN DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND INTEGRITY CARE GROUP LIMITED Applicant Environment Judge J J M Hassan – sitting alone under s279 of the Act In Chambers a

2. ENV-2016-AKL-000TBA Albany North Land Group v Auckland Council [pdf, 6.1 MB]

   ...ANLG will provide an appropriate method to use, develop and protect the ANLG site: 3 SJE-889273-4-391-V1:al (a) There are no practical impediments to further residential development of this land as the area can be adequately and efficiently serviced with water, wastewater, and traffic infrastructure. The only outstanding infrastructure matter is the intersection between The Avenue and Dairy Flat Highway. There is no doubt that the intersection will be upgraded at some time in t...

3. LCRO 42/2021 JKL Limited v HC and GD (30 August 2021) [pdf, 277 KB]

   ...sought in the statutory demand was $309,753.75.3 2 In his response to the complaint Mr GD described his role as Relationship Partner as being "to assist with the management of client relationship issues, including performance issues; client service issues; and non-payment of fees." It is common ground that Mr GD was not involved in the legal work associated with Projects [ABC] and [XYZ]. 3 This amount included interest on the unpaid fees, the total of which was $298,713.09 (i...

4. [2007] NZEmpC AC 49/07 Landmarx Developments (NZ) Ltd v Raman [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...guide me in the exercise of my discretion is the interests of justice. The matters referred to by Chief Judge Goddard in Day provide helpful headings but only insofar as they are relevant to the circumstances of the particular case. The parties addressed their submissions using those headings and I shall do the same in this judgment. The reason for the omission and the length of the delay [8] As Ms Davis submitted the applicant had until 2 April 2007 to appeal as of rig...

5. 2023-12-18-Memorandum-of-Counsel-for-the-Applicant.pdf [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...to the Court of the Applicant’s resource consent application RM220103 (the Application) for resource consent to establish and operate a solar farm in Greytown (the Proposal). 3. The Directions list a number of matters that the Applicant is to address in this Memorandum. Those matters are addressed below in the order they appear in the Directions. 4. The Applicant has in the course of preparing this Memorandum, as directed by the Court, consulted with South Wairarapa District Co...

6. LCRO 119/2022 FT v GS (31 October 2022) [pdf, 183 KB]

   ...relationship between Mr FT and Mr GS broke down. [8] Mr GS made application to the court for leave to withdraw as counsel for Mr FT. That application was granted. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [9] Mr FT lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS) on 10 December 2021. The substance of his complaint was that Mr GS: (a) had been incompetent, dishonest, and negligent in his representation of him; and (b) had incorrect...

7. RS v NC LCRO 70/2011 (17 April 2013) [pdf, 85 KB]

   ...December 2008. The Practitioner advised from the outset that there were difficulties with the claim because the [Iwi X] settlement was full and final to claims in the [Area A]. [3] In February 2009 of the following year an Agreement for Legal Services with the Practitioner’s firm (Company B) was signed by the Applicant on behalf of the whānau and the following day a meeting took place with members of the whānau at which time the Practitioner was instructed to enquire about w...

8. Beef+Lamb-New-Zealand-Limited.pdf [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...proceedings. CP Thomsen Counsel for s 274 party Beef+Lamb New Zealand Ltd 29 September 2020 3 This notice was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the party of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above- named party is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Nelson. Documents for service on the party may be: (a) Posted to the solicitor at Fletcher Vautier Moore, S...

9. Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited.pdf [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...proceedings. CP Thomsen Counsel for s 274 party Beef+Lamb New Zealand Ltd 29 September 2020 3 This notice was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the party of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above- named party is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Nelson. Documents for service on the party may be: (a) Posted to the solicitor at Fletcher Vautier Moore, S...

10. Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited.pdf [pdf, 109 KB]

    ...proceedings. CP Thomsen Counsel for s 274 party Beef+Lamb New Zealand Ltd 29 September 2020 3 This notice was filed by CHRISTOPHER PAUL THOMSEN, solicitor for the party of the firm Fletcher Vautier Moore. The address for service of the above- named party is at the offices of Fletcher Vautier Moore, Solicitors, 265A Queen Street, Richmond, Nelson. Documents for service on the party may be: (a) Posted to the solicitor at Fletcher Vautier Moore, S...