Search Results

1. LCRO 83/2024 AGM v CPF (24 March 2025) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...in her time records referenced correspondence received from RK on 26 April 2023. [19] In response, Mr F offered to settle his outstanding invoice with a payment in the sum of $500.00. [20] Around this time, the firm [law firm 1] transitioned to new ownership. [21] Ms AGM advised Mr F that she had consulted with the firm’s new owner and would accept payment of $750.00 to settle the outstanding fees if payment was made within 24 hours. Upon receiving payment, she would provide Mr F w...

2. 25 October 2017 Titirangi Protection Group Incorporated, Berman, Carter & Hutchings v Watercare Services Limited & Auckland Council [pdf, 426 KB]

   ...declaration in respect of Designation 9324 Huia and Nihotupu Water Treatment Plants in the partly operative Unitary Plan of Auckland Council ENV-2017 -304-000081 i. Titirangi Protection Group Incorporated, Berman, Carter & Hutchings v Watercare Services Limited & Auckland Council Application For Declaration pursuant to Section 311 of the Resource Management Act 1991 Court Reference: ENV-2017-AKL-000121

3. [2022] NZEnvC 063 Wayfare Group Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 861 KB]

   ...stability The extent to which any proposal demonstrates that fill associated with buildings, retaining, accesses and parking areas comply with the QLDC Land Development and Subdivision Code of Practice, where these matters have not already been addressed through a subdivision consent or building consent pursuant to Building Act 2004. Where earthworks are proposed on a site gradient greater than 18.5 degrees (1 in 3), whether advice from a suitably qualified person has been provide...

4. DQ Ltd v SM Ltd [2022] NZDT 6 (18 November 2021) [pdf, 199 KB]

   ...there was genuine confusion over whether the set-off had been taken into account in the Tribunal order, would have been to seek clarification or file an application for rehearing or notice of appeal rather than ignore the Tribunal order and initiate new legal proceedings. [14] As stated at hearing, the central issue for the Tribunal to determine is: is the amount claimed by the respondent in the statutory demand of 31 August 2020 excluded by the Tribunal determination summarised in its o...

5. Lehmann v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2024] NZACC 108 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...concerns with carer “double dipping”. • Request for digital footprint. [4] On 9 November 2022, the Corporation issued a decision as follows. It had been established that the Corporation had failed to provide the highest standard of service in relation to Ms Young’s claim. This had resulted in several breaches of the Code of ACC Claimants Rights 2002, in particular, around effective communication, treating Ms Young fairly and with dignity and respect, and keeping her...

6. Legal aid - Criminal Procedure Act 2011 - consultation [pdf, 313 KB]

   Page | 1 Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (Legal Services) Consultation Document Page | 2 Contents Consultation Document 1 About the reforms 3 About the Legal Aid implications 3 Aligning the Proceedings Categories 4 Re- assignment and Third Strike Offences 6 Changes to Appeals 7 Changes to Fixed-Fees Payment Schedules 8 Summary of Questions 9 How to respond 10 Although all reasonable steps have been tak...

7. Horticulture New Zealand 204 [pdf, 75 KB]

   ...IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of section 274 of the Act BETWEEN Cato Bolam Consultants Ltd Appellant AND Auckland Council Respondent NOTICE OF WISH OF HORTICULTURE NEW ZEALAND TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS 2 TO: The Registrar Environment Court AUCKLAND 1. Horticulture New Zealand wishes to be party to this proceeding (ENV-2016- AKL-000204) (an appeal by Cato Bolam Consultants Ltd)....

8. Horticulture New Zealand 215 [pdf, 76 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) AND IN THE MATTER of section 274 of the Act BETWEEN Man O’War Farm Ltd Appellant AND Auckland Council Respondent NOTICE OF WISH OF HORTICULTURE NEW ZEALAND TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS 2 TO: The Registrar Environment Court AUCKLAND 1. Horticulture New Zealand wishes to be party to this proceeding (ENV-2016-AKL-000215) (an appeal by Man O’War Farm Ltd)....

9. H Ltd v MN & KN [2023] NZDT 656 (8 November 2023) [pdf, 309 KB]

   ...b. The purpose and intent of the 2 February letter was to encourage Mr X to address the issues of concern. This was confirmed by the approach that Mr & Mrs N took after the notice period expired. Mr C wanted Mr X to make progress towards addressing the issues, and he was largely satisfied with the progress that Mr X was making. This was further confirmed in the meeting on 14 March. c. Adding to this was discussion around tiding up matters by 1 May. This date was geared towa...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 146 Duffy v Ngatahi horticultural P/Ship [pdf, 101 KB]

    ...and, for the purposes of this decision, I accept Mr Duffy’s evidence that, for the period of 1 [2011] NZERA Christchurch 8. 2 In accordance with the full Court decision in Abernathy v Dynea New Zealand Ltd (No 1) [2007] ERNZ 271. several years prior to May 2009, there was an ongoing employment relationship between the parties. [7] Once Ngatahi took over the orchards, it followed a practice of entering into written employmen...