LCRO 168/2016 WT v MD (30 May 2018) [pdf, 269 KB]
...the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr MD complained about the advice provided to him by WT & Partners. WT & Partners was not an incorporated law firm and consequently the Lawyers Complaints Service processed the complaint as being against Mr PT and his son, Mr WT. Another partner, Mr IH, was referred to in Mr MD’s complaints but the [City] Standards Committee [X] (the Committee) did not include him as one of the persons complain...