8054 items matching your search terms
KAMLESH PRASAD v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LTD NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC [11 May 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 48 EMPC 253/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER of an application for an order requiring further and better particulars of claims BETWEEN KAMLESH PRASAD First Plaintiff AND LIUTOFAGA TULAI Second Pl...
...some of which are relevant to this case. 1 I refer to her by the epithet of Dr, as she was throughout the events reviewed in this judgment. A registered health practitioner is entitled to be so addressed. As will become evident, her registration was subsequently cancelled, and currently she is not entitled to be so addressed. 2 There is a permanent order of non-publication of name for Dr Emmerson’s partner: minute of 1 October...
...need to maintain higher standards. [23] A review of the file resulted in the Committee identifying a number of issues which it listed on a Notice of Hearing, inviting submissions on Ms KX’s alleged: (a) Failure to provide competent advice and services to [JB] on receipt of the instructions as to the obligations to be undertaken by a trustee who is not a beneficiary, how the trust worked and why [Trustee Co Ltd] was a trustee; (b) Failure to provide competent advice and informa...
...156(3) of the Act BETWEEN MAN O’ WAR FARM LIMITED Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent NOTICE OF PERSON’S WISH TO BE PARTY TO PROCEEDINGS Section 274, Resource Management Act 1991 Federated Farmers of New Zealand To: The Registrar Environment Court CX10086 Auckland I, Federated Farmers of New Zealand, wish to be a party to the following proceedings: ENV-2016-AKL-000261 Man O’ War Farm Limited v Auckland Council...
...the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal? Does the Disputes Tribunal have jurisdiction to hear this claim? (b) Did TY have apparent authority to act on TYY’s behalf in approving the insurance? (c) Did TY/TYY take reasonable care in supplying MBI services? (d) If not, has FB suffered any loss as a consequence? Issue to be Determined Does this dispute cover issues already determined by the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal? Does the Disputes Tribunal have jurisdiction...
...after that. REASONS Introduction [1] Mr Schmuck has operated Dougs's Opua Boatyard (the 'Opua Boatyard') from Walls Bay, Opua, for many decades. Its operation has been fraught with controversy. [2] This is an application for renewal of regional consents relating to discharges. These consents have been extant since at least 2002 and were renewed by Regional Council consent CON20060791410 (10-15) on 20 May 2008. The consents 10-15, except 14, expired on 20 March 201...
...unhappy with the Ministry of Justice’s decision regarding your complaint, you have the right to raise your concerns with the Ombudsman. Office of the Ombudsman contact details: Freephone: 0800 802 602 Email: info@ombudsman.parliament.nz Postal address: PO Box 10152 Wellington 6143 The Ombudsman can consider complaints about the administrative acts and decisions of state sector agencies. The Ombudsman will ask you if you have first tried to resolve the matter with us directly and...
BIRTHING CENTRE LIMITED v REBEKAH MATSAS [2023] NZEmpC 162 [27 September 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZEmpC 162 EMPC 285/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BIRTHING CENTRE LIMITED Plaintiff AND REBEKAH MATSAS First Defendant AND CHELSEA VAN DUIN Second Defendant AND...
BUNKER & ROUSE v QLDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 182 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act BETWEEN M J BERESFORD, R T BUNKER & L M ROUSE (ENV-2018-CHC-69) Appellants AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J J M Hassan Environment Judge S Tepania Environ
The Use of Imprisonment in New Zealand Ministry of Justice Criminal Justice Policy Group June 1998 2 3 4 Table of Contents Page Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………….7 1. Introduction………………………………………………………