Search Results

1. BD and NQ v R Co Ltd [2021] NZDT 1354 (12 February 2021) [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: R & Co. Ltd is to pay the sum of $393.00 directly to NQ on or before 5 March 2021. Reasons 1. BD (as a director) and NQ engaged R & Co Ltd (‘RCL’) in May 2020 to provide conveyancing services. They had purchased a property [Property 1] and settlement date was to be 24 July 2020. 2. RCL points out that, of the two applicants, only NQ was a purchaser of [Property 1] directly, BD being a director of the company (GX Ltd)...

2. KM v XND [2013] NZIACDT 7 (14 February 2013) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...this advice. Ms KM accordingly applied for a student permit. Her application was made on 31 March 2010. In fact, Ms KM was not eligible for a student permit and should not have been advised to apply for one. [7.4] On 8 June 2010, Immigration New Zealand wrote a letter to Ms KM, and told her she was not eligible for a student permit. Ms KM consulted Ms MA regarding the letter. Ms MA wrote a letter to Immigration New Zealand in response and submitted it with supporting documentation...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 129 Caddy v Vice-Chancellor, University of Auckland [pdf, 371 KB]

   DAVINIA CADDY v VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND [2021] NZEmpC 129 [13 August 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 129 EMPC 180/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN DAVINIA CADDY Plaintiff AND VICE-CHANCELLOR, UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND Defendant Hearing: 1–4 and 7 Dec...

4. Engelbrecht TRI-2020-100-007 Procedural Order 6 [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...the 21 The Creighton parties’ claim against Powell Fenwick is for contribution or indemnity, which has its own limitation rules. They are discussed in BNZ Branch Properties Ltd v Wellington City Council [2021] NZHC 1058. They have not been addressed by any party, so I will not deal with them. 22 Limitation Act 1950, s 4(1)(a). 23 Building Act 2004, s 393(2). 24 Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006, s 37. 25 Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006, ss...

5. LCRO 24/2019 UC v SO (30 September 2020) [pdf, 156 KB]

   ...Trust Account Regulations,12 the Committee made a finding of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr UC pursuant to s 12(c) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act). [22] The Committee made the following orders:13 a) Mr UC is to pay to the New Zealand Law Society a fine of $1,500 (section 156(1)(i)); and b) Mr UC is to pay to the New Zealand Law Society the sum of $1,000 in respect of the costs and expenses of and incidental to the inquiry and investigation made and hearing co...

6. Final Env-Reg-Report-2020-21 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...Steven QC Alternate Environment Court Judges Judge C Doherty Judge C Fox Judge S Clark Judge J Kelly Judge P Kellar Judge G Rea Judge G Davis Judge S O’Driscoll Judge M Doogan Judge L Harvey Judge C Thompson Judge B P Dwyer Judge L J Newhook May 2000 Nov 2008 Sept 2009 Nov 2013 Nov 2018 Feb 2021 Aug 2008 Sept 2009 July 2009 Sept 2009 Sept 2009 Feb 2011 April 2011 May 2013 Oct 2018 Oct 2018 Oct 2018 Dec 2019 July 2020 Auckland Christchurch Auckla...

7. OIA-103056.pdf [pdf, 7.3 MB]

   ...procurement process based on its needs. This process has not changed over the past six months. Under the terms of our agreement with Microsoft, we purchase a surplus of 0.5% of our total number of licences to remain proactive to be able to respond to new users (onboarding) and remain compliant. The Ministry annually reviews its volume and consumption of licences, and adjusts accordingly, though there have been no significant reductions in licences as result of the most recent review. Th...

8. Proactive release – Sexual Violence Legislation Bill: approval for introduction [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...cross-examination is to be used, and whether any further cross-examination may occur after the recording has been made, can be appealed before the trial with the appeal court’s leave. This will help ensure consistency and bolster confidence in the new processes, especially in the early stages of implementation. Requiring evidence to be recorded 15. The Bill requires sexual violence complainants’ and propensity witnesses’ evidence to be recorded (unless it has already been record...

9. SE v VT, DJ and CM LCRO 163/2014 (11 March 2015) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...refrain from releasing the MYOB program until the dispute had been resolved. [8] This stand-off was not resolved until late 2006 when the program was provided to Mr SE. [9] In mid 2013 Mr SE filed complaints against the three lawyers with the New Zealand Law Society Lawyers Complaints Service (NZLS). These were summarised as follows by the Standards Committee: • Mr VT and Mr CM were alleged to have “refused to release files and/or financial records belonging to the com...

10. E90 Graeme McIndoe - Urban Design - RE – Applicant [pdf, 967 KB]

    ...façade of Base G). d) Provision for passive surveillance can be guaranteed, whereas formal surveillance is not. 5. DESIGN REQUIREMENTS: RESPONSE TO EVIDENCE OF MR GROESCHNER 5.1 The matters raised in expert evidence by others have now been fully addressed in the changes to the Design Requirements described above and agreed to by all of these parties as described in the 31 August JWS. The process of refinement and agreement was informed by full exchange of evidence, graphic analys...