LCRO 36/2024 CFJ v BDU (31 July 2025) [pdf, 254 KB]
...meet their warranty obligations. She proposed that the purchaser retain $50,000 on settlement pending their completion. This letter was not forwarded to either vendor at the time. [8] It is unclear whether the respondent’s partner had an email address. The applicant attempted to contact him on his mobile number. Unbeknownst to the applicant, the respondent’s partner’s mobile phone was not working. No attempt was made to contact the respondent, either directly or through her...