8054 items matching your search terms
...resignation email ………………………………………………………………. [94] Duty of fidelity/duty of good faith ………………………………………………… [119] Did Mr Farrimond use confidential information in the new business? ………….. [124] Customer lists ………………………………………………………………………... [127] Pricing ………………………………………………………………………...
...other compensation. Mr Hu’s position on sanctions [5] Mr Hu did not provide any submissions relating to sanctions. Discussion Perspective [6] This complaint presents a concerning picture. Mr Hu was negligent is a series of steps in his service delivery; critically his client was put into the position of being in New Zealand unlawfully as she did not hold a visa, and Mr Hu then failed to take appropriate steps when his client was in that position. [7] Mr Hu then failed to compl...
...a period of up to three years”. [10] For that purpose, Mr LQ instructed Mr JK to request, through Mr TM, Mr JQ’s permission for the accountant to make those enquiries. Complaint [11] Mr LQ lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 17 March 2016. [12] He sought (a) “[a] full accounting by [Mr JQ] of the funds” Mr JQ told him [Mr JQ] “was holding” for Mrs AQ, and (b) replies to Mr JK’s 20 November 2015 letter, and his 14, 18, and 23 December 2015...
...Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals (Standard Terms) Our Standard Terms apply to all interpreter bookings engaged on behalf of courts and tribunals, whether the booking is agreed over the phone or in writing. When you accept a booking to provide interpreter services, you’re automatically accepting these Standard Terms for the engagement. Please make sure you’re familiar with the Standard Terms before you respond to a booking request as, unless otherwise specified, they’ll replace any ter...
1 Regulatory Impact Statement Parliamentary Privilege Bill Agency Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It analyses options for addressing some concerns about parliamentary privilege raised by Parliament’s Privileges Committee (Question of privilege concerning the defamation action Attorney‐General and Gow v Leigh, June 2013). 2. O...
Revision 4 3 February 2025 146654.60 Australia Netherlands New Zealand USA Initial Seismic Assessment Ministry of Justice - Nelson Courthouse 200 Bridge Street Nelson Initial Seismic Assessment Report Level 2, 254 Montreal Street Christchurch Central PO Box 6718 Christchurch 8442 holmesanz.com Initial Seismic Assessment Report Nelson Courthouse ISA Prepared For: The Ministry of Justice Date: 3 February 2025 Project No: 1...
...Kneebone, Joanne Morris, Evelyn Stokes and Georgina Te Heuheu. Chief Judge Durie, the Chairperson of the Tribunal, and the full bench of the Maori Land Court were also present; Judge Durie helping to set the tone for the conference with a stimulating address at the hui opening on the deeds of our forebears in treaty promotion over the past 150 years, and the new challenges now before us. A number of the other judges who attended have strong connections with the Tribunal through their w...
...relevant to this application were not subject to Plan appeals, nor to any major changes through the mediation process. This relates in particular to RPE Objectives 1.2.1, .2, .3 and Policies 1.3.1 and 1.3.5. However, there has been the addition of a new Policy 1A to protect identified elements of the zone's distinctive rural character and amenity. [7] During the course of this hearing, the relevant Plan provisions were approved by the Court, and in any event all parties agreed...
...estuarine habitats in Kaiuma Bay are in moderate health, … 16. As little as 3 mm of sediment deposition in the immediate aftermath of storms has been shown to have measurable impacts on estuarine invertebrate 10 communities elsewhere in New Zealand. 17. I conclude negative impacts (sic) intertidal estuarine invertebrate communities in Kaiuma Bay are likely if clear-felling of the forests occurs followed by a large rainfall event. 35. The key ecological consideration for t...
...about the way that the criminal trial had been conducted, namely, an appeal to the Court of Appeal. [18] The core of the complaint is that the Applicant considers that there has been an injustice in his case. However, the Lawyers’ Complaints Service is not the appropriate avenue for challenging criminal convictions. [19] Having carefully considered all material on the file and the relevant law it is my view that the Standards Committee decision correctly dismissed the compla...