Search Results

1. LCRO 112-2009 KO [pdf, 87 KB]

   ...recognised that this is between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on a working day. This is supported by AEL Group Ltd v Kensington Swan Lawyers 31/7/08, Associate Judge Christiansen, HC Christchurch CIV-2008-409-1225. His honour there found that service on a law firm after 5 p.m. on a business day would not be effective (though in the circumstances service by facsimile prior to 5pm was effective). [11] I observe that while Mr KO did not send his application until the 28th of July he...

2. LCRO 112/2009 KO - Decision on Jurisdiction (4 September 2009) [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...recognised that this is between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on a working day. This is supported by AEL Group Ltd v Kensington Swan Lawyers 31/7/08, Associate Judge Christiansen, HC Christchurch CIV-2008-409-1225. His honour there found that service on a law firm after 5 p.m. on a business day would not be effective (though in the circumstances service by facsimile prior to 5pm was effective). [11] I observe that while Mr KO did not send his application until the 28th of July he...

3. [2023] NZCAA 01 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 189 KB]

   Representatives: Colin Mitchell, Barrister, Auckland, for the Appellants New Zealand Customs Service, Auckland, for Customs BEFORE THE CUSTOMS APPEAL AUTHORITY Decision: [2023] NZCAA 01 UNDER The Customs and Excise Act 2018 BETWEEN XXXX and YYYY Appellants AND Chief Executive of the New Zealand Customs Service Respondent Hearing: On the papers Counsel: Mr C Mitchell, counsel for the Appellants. Ms N Taylor and Ms O Nor...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 022 WST Company (2016) Limited [pdf, 1.3 MB]

   ...by the other expert planning witnesses in the preparation of their evidence to reduce repetition. We are grateful for that and find that a helpful approach to the presentation of evidence especially where matters are agreed. [30] The report addressed a broad range of potential environmental effects. We have not addressed all of them in detail in this decision. We have focussed more closely on the issues that were presented as the issues at the forefront of the hearing and where w...

5. LCRO 60/2017 NV v GW (31 July 2017) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...with the outcome. She considered that the agreement reached was unsatisfactory and that it had failed to achieve a fair result for herself and her son. The complaint and the Standards Committee decision [16] Ms NV lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (NZLS) on 12 March 2016. The complaint filed was comprehensive. Ms NV’s complaint provided a detailed account of the background to the trust dispute, a history

6. BORA Employment (Pay Equity and Equal Pay) Bill [pdf, 296 KB]

   ...1 RJR MacDonald v Attorney-General of Canada (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. c. cl 19 requires employers, where pay equity claims have been consolidated, to provide all claimants with one another’s names and addresses (except where a claimant has requested confidentiality); d. cl 22 requires parties to a pay equity claim to provide each other information that is reasonably required to support or substantiate the claim or a response to the claim; an

7. Trinder – Kopu – Mangati B2B (2024) 485 Aotea MB 55 (485 AOT 55) [pdf, 1023 KB]

   485 Aotea MB 55 Trinder – Kopu – Mangati B2B (2024) 485 Aotea MB 55 (485 AOT 55) I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District AP-20230000033778 WĀHANGA Under Section 289, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Mangati B2B NĀ By SANDRA ANN TRINDER Te kaitono Applicant AP-20230000035107 WAHANGA Under Section 289, Te Ture Whenua Mā...

8. Appendix-13-Combined-Section-92-NOR-and-Resource-Consents.pdf [pdf, 771 KB]

   ...based on the stream stimulation culvert design will also have a riparian zone upstream and downstream that is planted. This is proposed to be for the length of stream within the designation. Would the Applicant please identify the condition that addresses the intent of Para 194? 42. Para 209 (Page 117) refers to the potential for offsetting for outlet structures which discharge stormwater from treatment facilities, but that this will not be confirmed until detailed design. However, the...

9. [2016] NZEmpC 92 Patel & Anor v Sharma [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...disputes their allegations. [11] The plaintiffs applied for a stay of execution of the determination on the same day as they filed their challenge. The plaintiffs’ application has not been able to be dealt with while two preliminary matters were addressed. The first matter was about service on Mr Sharma overseas and the second was how he would conduct his defence to the challenge given his domicile in India. Both matters were addressed at a telephone directions conference held...

10. [2020] NZIACDT 49 - HQT v Singh (19 November 2020) [pdf, 309 KB]

    ...Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] Mr Inderpal Singh, the adviser, acted for HQT, the complainant, and KWU, the complainant’s partner. The complainant sought to bring his partner to New Zealand. [2] A complaint was made by the complainant to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority). The Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) has referred it to the Tribunal. It is alleged that Mr Singh failed...