8049 items matching your search terms
...and Tribunals of Aotearoa New Zealand. The Digital Strategy sets out the judiciary’s objectives and guiding principles for use of technology in courts. Te Au Reka was identified as one of the four priority initiatives for the judiciary, to ‘address the most acute justice infrastructure needs’ of New Zealand’s courts and tribunals.
...ET had not identified in May 2023. This would not entitle CI to a refund for the May 2023 work. Rather, if this was the case then CI would always have had to pay an additional charge to have any such additional work completed. c. An entirely new issue had arisen. This would not entitle CI to a refund for the May 2023 work. If this was the case then CI would always have had to pay an additional charge to have any new issue repaired. 10. I am unable to find that any one of the re...
...In his accompanying letter, Mr QT requested payment of the ordered sum, $[Amount], within seven days in order to avoid a charging order being registered against the title to the property. Complaint [10] The owners lodged a complaint with the New Zealand Law Society Complaints Service (Complaints Service) on 10 August 2017 in which they complained about Mr QT’s “poor credibility and unacceptable misconduct”. Receipt of Levies [11] They stated that the firm “inappropr...
...411”) decided to lay a further charge against Ms Wallace under s 73(d) of the Act, based on the conviction (“the second charge”). On 20 July 2016, CAC 411 applied for leave to lay the second charge. [12] Attempts to affect personal service of the documents relevant to the second charge on Ms Wallace were unsuccessful. The process server instructed by counsel for CAC 411 was advised that (on one occasion) Ms Wallace was away on holiday and (on the second occasion) that...
...regard to timing over the Christmas period, the last date for the filing of a challenge was 18 January 2021. [7] On 14 January 2021, OSS filed a non-de novo challenge to the Authority’s determination. The Court issued the challenge for service on 15 January 2021. [8] On 18 January 2021, the final day on which a challenge was able to be lodged within time, OSS’s lawyer contacted Mr Arthur’s lawyer asking if he was authorised to accept service of OSS’s statement of cla...
...Wharekura told the complainant he had contacted the Dyslexia Association and was waiting for a letter from it. [7] The complainant paid Mr Wharekura $400 on 27 November 2018. [8] Mr Wharekura wrote a document, dated 27 November 2018, which was addressed to the “Section 61 Team”. It introduced the complainant and explained his 1 KBN v Wharekura [2019] NZIACDT 66. 3 circumstances, including his dyslexia. An exemption from the I...
...by ED, the complainant, to obtain a student visa for herself and a visitor visa for her husband. The complainant says she dealt only with the unlicensed FN and EL. The visa applications were duly filed but ultimately withdrawn, as Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) raised an issue about forged documents filed by the couple on earlier applications. [2] A complaint to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority) was referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (th...
...this complaint), the Tribunal has prevented Ms Tangilanu from reapplying for a licence for two years. Those decisions explain why I do not consider rehabilitation is realistic. Those sanctions relating to Ms Tangilanu’s ability to hold a licence address the protection of the public and the desirability of rehabilitation. In relation to the other sanctions imposed, the orders excluding Ms Tangilanu from practising are taken into account as part of the matrix of penalties. The complainant...
...this complaint), the Tribunal has prevented Ms Tangilanu from reapplying for a licence for two years. Those decisions explain why I do not consider rehabilitation is realistic. Those sanctions relating to Ms Tangilanu’s ability to hold a licence address the protection of the public and the desirability of rehabilitation. In relation to the other sanctions imposed, the orders excluding Ms Tangilanu from practising are taken into account as part of the matrix of penalties. [12] The comp...
...at the respondent’s son’s school, which she and the respondent and other third parties attended on 12 February 2024. 9. After the home visit on 9 February 2024 the respondent received from the applicant what was essentially a general Happy New Year greeting email from the applicant, addressed to all her clients. It contained reference to what would be the applicant’s advocacy fee structure for the year. 10. By then the respondent had not received a personal invoice from the ap...