Search Results

Search results for new address for service .

8049 items matching your search terms

Search Disputes Tribunal only.

  1. Waikato River Authority.pdf [pdf, 160 KB]

    ...10. WRA agrees to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the proceedings. WRA by its solicitors and authorised agents Buddle Findlay: Signature: P T Beverley / C E Bulow Date: 29 September 2020 Address for Service: Buddle Findlay Level 17, Aon Centre 1 Willis Street Wellington 6011 Service may also be effected by: (a) posting it to the solicitor at PO Box 2694, Wellington; or (b) leaving it for the solic...

  2. [2022] NZIACDT 23 - TQ v Gibson - Sanctions (7 September 2022) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...Adviser: Self-represented 2 INTRODUCTION [1] Sharon Anne Gibson, a licensed immigration adviser, was engaged by TQ, the complainant, to seek residence. She duly made the application, but overlooked replying to a letter from Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) which led to the decline of the application. [2] A complaint against Ms Gibson to the Immigration Advisers Authority (the Authority) was referred by the Registrar of Immigration Advisers (the Registrar) to t...

  3. E v Hakaoro [2015] NZIACDT 29 (17 March 2015) [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...breached his duties of due care, diligence, respect and professionalism (clause 1.1(a) of the 2010 Code). [6.2] That Mr Hakaoro breached clause 1.1(c) of the 2010 Code in relation to not informing the complainant he could not continue to provide services. The grounds were: [6.2.1] This Tribunal cancelled Mr Hakaoro’s licence with effect from 4 June 2013. [6.2.2] He did not tell the complainant. [6.2.3] He breached clause 1.1(c) of the 2010 Code as he did not take reasonable steps t...

  4. [2018] NZEnvC 109 V T Taueki v Horowhenua District Council [pdf, 796 KB]

    ...that they not proceed until such time as the District Council had obtained an authority to undertake them from Heritage New Zealand under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 (the Heritage Act), which she contended was required. I will address that issue in due course. [4] The District Council opposes the application. Manawatu-Wanganui Regional Council (the Regional Council) the regional authority responsible for administration and application of the relevant regional...

  5. [2017] NZEnvC 047 North Eastern Investments Limited & Heritage Lands Limited v Auckland Transport [pdf, 477 KB]

    ...designated area to be reduced to that required for the operational road only (and permanent supporting structures and works and their maintenance) as opposed to including significant additional areas for construction in addition to conditions which addressed the adverse effects on NEIL and a reduction in the lapse period from 10 to 2 years (see Appeal Notice paragraph 11). [36] While NEIL's bottom line was that it did not want the designation and so whether there was any pros...

  6. 2017 NZSSAA 027 (16 June 2017) [pdf, 104 KB]

    ...of Kiwisaver fell within the provision of s 70(1)(b). Brewer J concluded that as Kiwisaver is a particular creation of New Zealand statute it stands apart from the regime created by s 70 of the Act.5 The issue [10] The issue we need to address is whether the payments that Mr XXXX receives from Taiwan fall within the category of benefits, pensions, or allowances which are to be deducted from NZS in accordance with s 70(1)(b). A two-stage inquiry is required. The first st...

  7. OIA-114187.pdf [pdf, 6.2 MB]

    ...which details the information being released to you. Some information has been withheld under the following provisions of the Act: • section 9(2)(a) to protect privacy of natural persons, • section 6(a) to prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand or the international relations of the Government of New Zealand, • section 9(2)(f)(iv) to maintain the constitutional conventions that protect confidentiality of advice tendered by Ministers and officials, or • section 9(2)(g)(i)...

  8. MBL v Shadforth [2016] NZIACDT 31 (16 June 2016) [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...contemptuous behaviour. While the conduct was far less egregious than Ms Shadforth’s behaviour, Judge D M Wilson QC’s observations in Prakash v Kumar 4 CIV-2013-004-000019, Auckland District Court, 7 May 2013 (http://www.iaa.govt.nz/adviser/news/decisions/index.asp) illustrate how lack of contrition and blaming others leaves no room for rehabilitation. [14] It is of course entirely appropriate and proper to challenge the Authority, the Tribunal, Immigration New Zealand...

  9. 2021-07-05 MFE- Closing Submissions [pdf, 551 KB]

    ...at stake. The specific places where this is important cannot be known with any certainty but a general approach to maintaining priorities in the interim offers the best insurance against inadvertently degrading the environment further until the new LWRP. 22. A number of variations on a Priorities policy are in play. That preferred by the Minister (subject to further conferencing by the planners) is as follows: New Policy Where the application is to replace a deemed water permit t...

  10. Otago Standards Committee v Saunderson-Warner [2013] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 231 KB]

    ...Saunderson-Warner, you were not in a position to accept any further instructions from the H’s, were you? A: Well, how could I? The whole basis of the issue was resolving the debt recovery in terms of the distress warrant with Mr S’s residential address. ... I was stuck, what could I do? ... Q: As a result of that discussion the firm could not accept future instructions? A: No. Q: So, are you agreeing with me or - 9 A: Well - well, sorry, there’s no way that...