Search Results

1. [2020] NZEnvC 214 Self Family Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 11 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 214 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 2010 of an appeal under section 156(1) of the Local Government (Auckland Transitional Provisions) Act 201 o SELF FAMILY TRUST (ENV-2016-AKL-000199) Appellant J & FGOCK Section 274 party AUCKLAND

2. HF v SZ LCRO 186 / 2009 (16 January 2012) - Publication Decision [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...review application also extended to the Committee’s order on publication. The Practitioner’s submissions accompanying his review application appeared to be incomplete and he was therefore invited to provide further submissions that particularly addressed the public interest LCRO 186/2009 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 4

3. [2016] NZEmpC 19 O'Shea (Labour Inspector) v Pekanga O Te Awa Farms Ltd [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...the Labour Inspector elected to challenge on a de novo basis. Accordingly, the Court heard evidence from both parties. Background [5] Pekanga operates a dairy farm in the Ashburton area. The company employed a Ukrainian national, who was in New Zealand on a work visa, from 7 October 2013 to 7 August 2014. [6] As a result of a complaint which was made to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (the Ministry), the Labour Inspector conducted an investigation as to w...

4. [2017] NZEmpC 105 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd & Anor [pdf, 159 KB]

   SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA v LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 105 [28 August 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 105 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a joinder order AND IN THE MATTER of an application for strike-out order AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a verification order BET...

5. Firearms reform

   We are reforming New Zealand's firearms laws and regulations to provide for greater protection of public safety and simplify regulatory requirements to improve compliance. Objectives The firearms reform programme will deliver a firearms system that: imposes controls that protect individuals and the public from fire-arms related harm supports the safe possession and use of firearms and other weapons for legitimate purposes, such as sports, hunting, collecting, and pest control. Why we are doing...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy >
   2. Key initiatives

6. Canterbury Westland Standards Committee 2 v Mr U [2024] NZLCDT 4 (9 February 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...EMPLOY MR U AND ALL COMPLAINANT NAMES ARE MADE PERMANENT ORDERS. THERE ARE FURTHER PERMANENT ORDERS FOR NON-PUBLICATION OF THE NAME OF MR U, HIS CHILDREN AND FORMER WIFE. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2024] NZLCDT 4 LCDT 018/23 IN THE MATTER of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 BETWEEN CANTERBURY WESTLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 2 Applicant...

7. Audit-and-monitoring-policy [pdf, 376 KB]

   ...Appendix 1 – Glossary 20 Glossary of Terms 20 6 Overview of Audits Overview About this part This part of the Provider Manual describes the Ministry of Justice’s (the Ministry’s) auditing processes for providers of legal aid services or specified legal services. The Ministry’s auditing processes include: • limited audits on providers carried out by Ministry auditors and • full and special audits carried out by external auditors. Purpose The purpose of the...

8. CP v XF LCRO 191 / 2010 (20 June 2011) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...That the Respondent repeated unsubstantiated allegations that J accompanied the Applicant while she was working as a prostitute. That the Respondent harassed the Applicant. That the Respondent wrongfully advised her that J’s father was in New Zealand and requesting access. [3] In its decision the Standards Committee accepted that it was necessary for the Respondent to act in the best interests of J and formed the view that the Respondent had adequately addressed the issues of...

9. Austin & Ors v Houghton & Ors [2014] NZWHT Auckland 6 [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...AUSTIN as Trustees of the NORMANDY TRUST Claimants AND GEOFFREY LYN HOUGHTON First Respondent AND PETER FRANCIS CHIBNALL (Removed) Second Respondent AND ARCHIBALD GORDON BRODIE (Removed) Third Respondent AND VERO INSURANCE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (Removed) Fourth Respondent Hearing: 22 April 2014 Appearances: L Austin in person G Houghton in person respondent Decision: 22 May 2014 FINAL DETERMINATION Adjudicator: M A Roche 2 [1] L...

10. Attitudes to crime & punishment: a New Zealand study [pdf, 541 KB]

    ...These two Acts largely replace the Criminal Justice Act 1985. The Sentencing Act 2002 provides for greater clarity, consistency and transparency in sentencing legislation and rationalises community-based and other sentences. The Parole Act 2002 aims to address inconsistencies in the proportion of a custodial sentence that must be served and to improve the parole decision-making structure in New Zealand. The effects of the Sentencing Act 2002 and Parole Act 2002 will continue to be monitored....