Search Results

1. Canterbury District Law Society v Wood [2009] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 225 KB]

   ...0034] [16] The next day, 31 October 2006, Mr McVeigh filed a Memorandum in response, stating that costs would be an issue and that neither he nor CDLS had been aware that Mr M was legally aided, as no notice had been given as required by the Legal Services Act 2000. [Bundle reference 052] [17] A judicial conference was convened on 1 November 2006, at which the question of costs was discussed. There was some uncertainty on the part of Mr Wood as to whether Mr M’s legal aid had bee...

2. Muraahi v Phillips Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and 55B1A2 Manu Ariki Marae [2013] Māori Appellate Court 561 (2013 APPEAL 561) [pdf, 284 KB]

   2013 Maori Appellate Court MB 561 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20120013041 APPEAL 2012/10 UNDER Section 58, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal against an order of the Māori Land Court made on 3 May 2012 at 282 Aotea MB 75 in respect of Rangitoto Tuhua 55B1B and 55B1A2 (Manu Ariki Marae) BETWEEN BEVERLY MURAAHI and FAITH BARLOW Appellants AND TEINA PHILLIPS First Respondent AND TE KOTAHITAN...

3. Odlin Family Trust v Hurunui District Council [2013] NZWHT Auckland 3 [pdf, 121 KB]

   ...weathertightness defects, a leak in the glazing over the kitchen and defective capping on the balcony. There were also other defects noted and this inspection failed. [2] Over the next five years the claimants engaged various trades in attempts to address the defects. In 2009, after significant new leaks appeared, the claimants applied for a WHRS report. They engaged an architect to prepare plans for remedial work based on this report and applied for building consent. The...

4. [2023] NZEnvC 091 Barnhill Corporate Trustee Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...2023) 24-2 Residential or Rural Lifestyle zone but excluding residential development for farming or other rural production activities; e. … 3.2 Strategic Objectives … 3.2.5 The retention of the District’s distinctive landscapes. (addresses Issues 2 and 4) (Strategic Objectives 3.2.5.1 – 3.2.5.78 inclusive elaborate on Strategic Objective 3.2.5. In addition, SO 3.2.1.7, 3.2.1.8 and 3.2.2.1 also elaborate on SO 3.2.5). … [add new SO after 3.2.5.7] Wakatipu Basin...

5. LCRO 130/2021 TF v SM (8 May 2025) [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...The applicant sought help from an associate (Mr X). Mr X provided $670,000 of funding to Company A. 1 Defined terms (the applicant, the respondent, Company A etc.) are used in this decision to facilitate anonymised publication. 2 [3] A new company was incorporated (Company B). The initial shareholders were a company controlled by Mr X (Company C) and the applicant and his wife jointly as trustees of a trust (the Trust). Mr X provided $50,000 of funding to Company B. [4...

6. [2014] NZEmpC 101 Milne v Air New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 112 KB]

   KATHLEEN ANN BEATTIE MILNE v AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 101 [9 July 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2014] NZEmpC 101 ARC 17/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings AND IN THE MATTER of an application for variation of orders for security for costs BETWEEN KATHLEEN ANN BEATTIE MILNE Pla...

7. ENV-2016-AKL-000xxx Kuegler Family Trust & Others v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...E). Signature: Kuegler Family Trust, Dunbar-Paddy Trust Mackintosh and Robinson Family Trust, Nathan Smith and Janeen Tunnicliff, and Benjamin and Melanie Reece by their authorised agent: Richard Brabant Date: 16 September 2016 Address for service: Richard Brabant Level 2, Broker House, 14 Vulcan Lane PO Box 1502, Shortland St Auckland Telephone: 012 975548 Email: richard@brabant.co.nz 6 Advice to recipients of copy of notice of appeal How to become p...

8. Laurence Nash and Paul Willetts 255 [pdf, 35 KB]

   ...potential zoning boundaries may seriously and adversely affect our property at 34 Wood St. We agree to participate in mediation or other alternative dispute resolution of the ~=:'J~~ (/)/p Signatures: ... 'O'i:..\.q.,..1..~ . Date Address for service: PO Box 47-205, Ponsonby Telephone: 093795953 mobile: 022 1364385 Email: laurence@nashdesign.co.nz Contact person: Laurence Nash ,

9. UY v Bunbury LCRO 17 / 2012 (4 March 2013) [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...regard for the fact that [Company A] may not have received any consideration at all for the purported sale of its business. This is an extremely irresponsible approach to take in respect of his obligations to [Company A]. [82] The question to be addressed is whether Dr Bunbury had a duty to [Company A]. From the evidence provided by both Mr UY and Dr Bunbury, the retainer provided in 2005 (or 2006) was a general retainer to act for the company in all matters. This was Mr UY’s...

10. [2020] NZEnvC 001 Environmental Defence Society v Thames Coromandel District Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

    ...Thames-Coromandel District Council [2018] NZEnvC 076. 3 process available under s 293 Resource Management Act 1991 {RMA or the Act). [3] The problems largely stemmed from the requirements to give effect to the Waikato Regional Policy Statement and the New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement under s 75(3) of the Act. The detail set out in that determination need not be repeated here. It is sufficient to note that, to the credit of everyone involved, the process was successful in add...